Jump to content


You ask - We reply. Bulletin 13


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
119 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:35 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,984
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Got questions on your mind? Don’t ponder any longer! The devs give answers to the community’s most pressing questions right here in the newest edition of You Ask – We Reply!

Full news text

Nectaria #2 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:41 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 9652 battles
  • 3,787
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011
Always cool to have answers :)

MrFingers #3 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:41 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4237 battles
  • 427
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011

Quote

Long ago you said you want to move Soviet T-50-2 and substitute it with something else. What would be the specs of such a potential substitute vehicle compared to the T-50-2? Would you choose one that has the same maneuverability, speed and gun or will they differ?

We do plan to make a move at that position. At the moment parameters of a future tank will not be disclosed, but its’ speed and maneuverability will more or less match those of Т-50-2.


Great... Yet another sportscar  <_<

Nosferat1 #4 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:47 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 15145 battles
  • 94
  • [GI-J] GI-J
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
I don't even....who asks these questions?  And even worse, who gives these extremely vague answers?

Cimex1105 #5 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:49 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13752 battles
  • 115
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011

View PostNosferat1, on 05 April 2012 - 10:47 AM, said:

I don't even....who asks these questions?  And even worse, who gives these extremely vague answers?

This answer can mean anything. Even T-50-2 will get a buff and be moved up a tier while some vague "replacement" with the same abilities gets in Tier 5. Lol.

grecko #6 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:49 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4751 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011
Nothing about 0 damage hits...

G0DSMACK #7 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:51 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 5783 battles
  • 119
  • [BGWAR] BGWAR
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
Sorry but.. 90% are just stupid questions from the RU community

Ragnar_L0thbr0k #8 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:53 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 9406 battles
  • 74
  • [7TP-R] 7TP-R
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011
Another bulletin with useless questions and even more useless answers... business as usual.

HelHammer #9 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 70275 battles
  • 483
  • Member since:
    12-06-2010
useless ................. as always.......

saml6131 #10 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:58 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 8559 battles
  • 3,821
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Nothing about the Churchill's ability to climb hills in 0.7.2 that never arrived or any information about it whatsoever?

Now that Overlord is tending to his blog and these aren't really our questions, how are we ever going to get the answers to the questions we have asked?

Shade1982 #11 Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:59 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19616 battles
  • 896
  • [QSF-L] QSF-L
  • Member since:
    11-07-2011
Well... not entirely useless, there's some slightly interesting info in this. Except that with WG you never know when these changes are actually happening...

Quote

Regarding British heavies: I heard, the top tier 10 heavy will be the FV-215b. This vehicle had a 183 mm gun. Is it possible that a top British heavy will have such a gun?

The British tech tree is still being worked out so we can’t comment on specifics like that yet.
I believe the FV-215b was designed to be a Tank Destroyer, not a heavy, hence the big gun...

DEFCON_1 #12 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:00 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 7585 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    03-23-2011
Bad questions and equally bad answers. As always honestly. Stop making these bulletins if you dont have anything to say!
Still after all this time,not a single word about multicore cpu support! What's wrong with you WG? You got so comfortable with the current income that you dont even think about finish the product?
You better think about doing what the people ask for, because people will not be forever patient and you won't be the only WWII tank game in the market for ever.........mark my words.

Cribb #13 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:05 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 37174 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostCommunity, on 05 April 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:

Got questions on your mind? Don’t ponder any longer! The devs give answers to the community’s most pressing questions right here in the newest edition of You Ask – We Reply!

Full news text


When will Eu site be up to date ?
Most of this Questions where up weeks ago on russian and us sites....


Best Regards

Cribb

joyuesp #14 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:07 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50069 battles
  • 7,695
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    01-22-2012
a jagtiger with a 88? another kv5 struggling to survive to tds and heavys with bigger guns.

i rather have a marder with a 128 :P

95tonne #15 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:07 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1934 battles
  • 309
  • Member since:
    12-12-2011
Who asks these questions?
Posted Image
Seriously, i have never seen these, nor i actually give a f*** about the RU server. It can burn, i don't care. We want questions WE asked, not some ape on the RU server. Enough of this bulls***!

sharky91 #16 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:11 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28292 battles
  • 201
  • Member since:
    06-09-2011

*
POPULAR

Really, stop it please... Do you think we are ignorant?

Those questions were NEVER asked, I don't know where you got them from ...or better, just admit you made them up.

Yes it's easy: "When will you use other parts of Global Map on EU server?" You just changed the words RU by EU? ;)

Probably because WE the EU community found out your previous "You ask - We reply" thread had questions from the RU community (remember the question about the KV-220, hint, hint?)

So You just put EU to make us think those are real questions from the EU community.

No, WG, we are not that simple minded...

I'd like to see serious questions & answers once and for all...


For now I'd call this: We ask - We Fake

Totenxcx #17 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:12 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8458 battles
  • 188
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
You ask questions, we dodge them.

Wriothesley #18 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:13 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50 battles
  • 1,066
  • [1BP] 1BP
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011
When can we get answers for questions WE ASKED?
http://forum.worldof...98313-ask-devs/

G0DSMACK #19 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:24 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 5783 battles
  • 119
  • [BGWAR] BGWAR
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
Near Future™

BabaLooey #20 Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:26 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24980 battles
  • 230
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011
Each bulletin only proves that Russian management cares more about their community, then EU management about us.
Why?
Cos out management never replies to any of our questions. All they do is translating the Russian bulletin.

PS - Sorry, not the only thing our management does for us. They also moderate any "harsh expressions" and every now and then they reset their own reputation.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users