Main page

Karl_Marx, on 06 June 2012 - 06:49 PM, said:

One post is enough mate.

Karl_Marx, on 06 June 2012 - 06:49 PM, said:

Assignments are being based on a spreadsheet calculation of all applicants to assure balanced teams in terms of player skills. Therefor we need a base amount of players who have spoken for a slot before we can post the first draft of assigned slots. So please be patient, an updated roster will be given as soon as possible.

I won't make it on Sunday since I'm attending a funeral. If one of the regulars has no tank from the lineup he can take FC40 account with T-34/85

T-34/85, Su-100, E8, ©

M48 for me confirmed!
Also have AMX 13 90 if needed!

Can you please post setup for M48?

Dang it - it's the next Sunday I'll be missing. So I stay with T-34/85 slot.

ok guys. I have marked_one94 with patton, but only if I play on the IDF side, 'cos he cannot speak english, so I have to translate. In this situation I could play with Sherman or the AMX..

if it is ok.
Edited by vitya, 07 June 2012 - 04:38 PM.

Roster updated

Mafionzo, on 06 June 2012 - 06:42 PM, said:

Mafionzo, if you can't be bothered to even check this thread, I'm gonna assume you won't bother showing up for the event either.
If you want to participate say so here ;)

AMX 13 90
SU-100

I can come with an amx13-90 for IDF side.

HB67 event patch: Download | Mirror

Main post and roster updated to add BakerPl and ShinyCopperpot

I might not be able to show up since depending on circumstances i could very well have gone to bed there (weird sleeping patterns and all)

Would someone tell me how the battles went?

GroundTrooper, on 11 June 2012 - 01:11 PM, said:

Everyone was bacon.

Also: Too many Tier 9s, should have kept it at 1 Tier 9 each. T-54 proved too bouncy once the defenders set up appropriately unlike in round 1 and 2 where we could flank the T-54 at close distances.

juckrebel, on 11 June 2012 - 01:32 PM, said:

I distinctly remember being sausage

Someone also joked that it would be really stupid if WG introduced T-62 as Tier X mediums.

Seems like WG sovieted their way into the teamspeak there and took the hint:
http://worldoftanks....ank-destroyers/

juckrebel, on 11 June 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:

Somehow I sense a balance breakdown.

juckrebel, on 11 June 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:

Ppl have been talking bout it for some time now, even saw a thread on another forum from a few months ago that suggested tanks for future tier X mediums and they had the exact same as the ones that will be added.

Anyway I quit wot, hf gl to everyone.
Edited by WasntMe, 11 June 2012 - 06:12 PM.

Well i think it is about time they stop using the WW2 label.

quick recap of the event:

1. too much HP killed fun for the little ones. could have been coped with by defining no go zones for the heavier tanks.
2. less competitive attitude lead to more fun without whining
3. the defenders knew they were spread out too far in the first two battles which we lost. if the only way for the defenders to win is to create a turtle defense in one corner the 'tactics' are limited again. tank warfare should include movement and the mod gives us chances to move without being detected. those attack defense szenarios shouldn't be too static
4. very nice models - thumbs up to the modders

no. 2 should be considered the most in future events because most people are tired of the whining