Jump to content


Stop It WarGaming !


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
57 replies to this topic

Poll: Stop It WarGaming ! (313 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Remove Crappy Maps or Add filter ?

  1. Remove (42 votes [13.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.42%

  2. Filter (271 votes [86.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 86.58%

Tinfoil Hat Theory ? Correct or just Nuts

  1. I think you could be on to something ! (139 votes [44.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.41%

  2. Nah man , lay off the Weed (174 votes [55.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 55.59%

How many maps should you be allowed to exclude

  1. 1 (17 votes [5.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.50%

  2. 2 (61 votes [19.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.74%

  3. 3 (117 votes [37.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.86%

  4. 4 (25 votes [8.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.09%

  5. 5 (12 votes [3.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.88%

  6. 6-----> (52 votes [16.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.83%

  7. 0 (25 votes [8.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.09%

Vote Hide poll

Phooca #1 Posted 08 June 2012 - 09:57 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 281 battles
  • 1,311
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
Right so it's been confirmed that Swamp and Komarin have been removed from random matches !

Personally I think Wargaming is going about this the wrong way , I didn't like Komarin at all but I didn't mind swamp , I'd some nice battles there , but I think it would be far better if they gave us the filter/map veto idea which has been talked about before ! So far we're after losing 3 maps that I'l never play again Province , Komarin and Swamp !
The thing is I'd like to play province but i dont want to play tier 2 and I'd like to play swamp , so give us this map veto , people will play the maps they like , there will be less bitching on the forums about crappy maps and 90 % of the people will be happy

Posted Image



Of course there should be a limit of roughly 3 maps you can untick/avoid , otherwise you'd just have arty on Malinokiva , TDs on Erlenberg and mediums on stepps for every game



OR MAYBE

Posted Image



They're adding two maps so they've to remove two maps :Smile_harp:



Edit*

Added a 0 choice to the poll as it wasn't exactly balanced ! My bad

Edited by Lostirishguy, 08 June 2012 - 10:16 AM.


JimLahey #2 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:01 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 29389 battles
  • 961
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
I think it's hilarious people here seem to think they remove the maps because "WG listens to the community".

No they don't.

They listen to the cash flow - the most beautiful sound on earth.

Apparently cosmetic surgery such as removal of maps makes the exec's feel like their belly has been rubbed.

ja_nein_meistens_immer #3 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:03 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 697 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011
Well, such a filter would have to be limitied in the number of maps that can be excluded (or players would be able to exclude every map except the one they want to play, effectively giving them full map selection).
With 2 new maps/patch this would probably mean more hated maps that I can filter out at some point.
So I'd much prefer removal of the worst maps, but I#m not against implementing a filter as well.

I have not seen so much rage against swamp, btw - was it really that hated or are they just removing the maps RU community hates ?

LittleGentleman #4 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:05 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21464 battles
  • 373
  • [GRFLT] GRFLT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
lets not complicate things they removed a map which 90% of us hate, good stuff i say!

GTRaPToR #5 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:10 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 20039 battles
  • 2,401
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
<profanity removed> sad. Atleast make your lazy programmers to work and create a mapfilter, instead of removing everything kids scream about.


Please don't use profanity in your posts.  Additionally, just because they don't agree with you, that doesn't make them "lazy."  Watch the insults.  Thanks in advance.

---Orree

Edited by Orree, 10 June 2012 - 02:36 AM.


Glepf #6 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:13 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12422 battles
  • 56
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011
I liked Swamp too.... But happy to never see Komarin again.

The filter for 3 or 4 maps is a very good idea. :Smile_glasses:

MXDoener #7 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:14 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 7761 battles
  • 1,063
  • Member since:
    09-15-2010
The filter would be a good thing....

Trebz #8 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:14 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 157
  • Member since:
    12-31-2011
Wish they would add a map filter. But that will never happen sadly

__Joff__ #9 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:18 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8683 battles
  • 196
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    02-05-2011
Komarin was better than Campinovca... Just IMHO.
Edit: why the neg rep? just saying my opinion... sheesh...

Edited by Naruto17141, 08 June 2012 - 12:31 PM.


FRITS_FIETSPOMP #10 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:18 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16380 battles
  • 249
  • [FP_NL] FP_NL
  • Member since:
    08-08-2011
WG listening to the community..... now that's a good one !

m14kill #11 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:25 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26130 battles
  • 449
  • Member since:
    03-30-2011
All maps are kinda okay BUT REMOVE MF DRAGON RIDGE!!

ravennn1 #12 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:31 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 5915 battles
  • 90
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View PostLittleGentleman, on 08 June 2012 - 10:05 AM, said:

lets not complicate things they removed a map which 90% of us hate, good stuff i say!
no, lets complicate things. filters are a good idea, what could you say against it? why settle for the lazy solution when it could be done so much better?
and if anyone is gonna say well... wg doesn't care, or they're not listening or they're whatever, don't waste your time. they should be made to care. it's a game, not a necessity, if they can't make it appealing anymore, people will just go for the next best thing.
(i really hope someone will make a game to compete with this one)

Ruikis #13 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:39 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17013 battles
  • 358
  • [BNEF] BNEF
  • Member since:
    12-17-2011

View Postm14kill, on 08 June 2012 - 10:25 AM, said:

All maps are kinda okay BUT REMOVE MF DRAGON RIDGE!!
i vote for that :Smile_popcorn1:

Zamial #14 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:45 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 12189 battles
  • 2,253
  • Member since:
    03-29-2011
Sure add a map filter. Then I can filter all maps except mines and queue in my platoon of bat chats, then wait as long as it takes to finally play mines with 30 mediums. Then I think i'll queue Malinovka on my Arty, and play with 30 other arty.

You can't let players choose the map and the tank they play on. The filter is just asking for trouble

SpiderXoo7 #15 Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:50 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24560 battles
  • 598
  • [BWF1] BWF1
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011
Filer FTW ! ... but not too much now... I say 2 would be well enough... when they eventually add another 10 maps than make it 3 I guess.

I honestly am happy those two maps are gone for now... maybe they will come back reworked in the future. But both of them were problematic because of the lack of organisation in most teams...
Komarin: how many times have we lost because there was 1 tank defending the base side and the rest of the team was camping in mid or in front of enemy base?
Swamp: same story... how many times have we lost because more than half the team go down to the bridge section cross over than camp cause they are too afraid to attack while we lose the other side or some scout comes and kills the arties and its all over...

Polski11 #16 Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:23 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32149 battles
  • 1,063
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012
I like all maps, coz if u find the best tactic for your playstyle u will love them all like me :) filter of 2 maps will be great coz i hate when i must play same map 2-3 times in a row.

Phooca #17 Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:26 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 281 battles
  • 1,311
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostZamial, on 08 June 2012 - 10:45 AM, said:

Sure add a map filter. Then I can filter all maps except mines and queue in my platoon of bat chats, then wait as long as it takes to finally play mines with 30 mediums. Then I think i'll queue Malinovka on my Arty, and play with 30 other arty.

You can't let players choose the map and the tank they play on. The filter is just asking for trouble

Which is exactly why nearly everybody in the poll voted for excluding 1-3 maps ,

Satch4 #18 Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:27 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7372 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011
Worst idea ever to remove these maps, they weren't my favourite maps either but the more maps the more fun imo.
A map filter could help indeed, but probably will never happen.
And now stop to screw up the game WG and make sure to work on the more important things than removing all the maps people whining about.

Zamial #19 Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:29 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 12189 battles
  • 2,253
  • Member since:
    03-29-2011

View PostLostirishguy, on 08 June 2012 - 11:26 AM, said:

Which is exactly why nearly everybody in the poll voted for excluding 1-3 maps ,

It's exactly why the concept overall is a bad idea.

If you can't handle a rotation of 20 something maps of which you don't like 3.  Well boo hoo for you.

momo03 #20 Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:36 AM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 29445 battles
  • 9,835
  • [DHPA] DHPA
  • Member since:
    07-28-2010
Biased poll, useless, please delete




10 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users