Jump to content


The T-62A fact sheet


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
206 replies to this topic

Eeti #101 Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:07 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29508 battles
  • 411
  • Member since:
    08-08-2011

View PostBarkmann, on 15 June 2012 - 03:55 PM, said:

Soo what are difrences beetwen T62a and T62 and T54? pls? GUN! somethink else? in T62a nad t62 is bit better armour on turrent. that 240mm is only mantlet

Can't you even read?

Barkmann #102 Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:20 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14251 battles
  • 185
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View PostEeti, on 15 June 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:

Can't you even read?

What did u mean? Read what?

Edited by Barkmann, 15 June 2012 - 07:24 PM.


Legault #103 Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:52 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 14706 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010

View PostBarkmann, on 15 June 2012 - 05:20 PM, said:

Cant you even tell what did u mean? Read what?
The post above yours explaining exactly what you asked.

theta0123 #104 Posted 15 June 2012 - 06:04 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 8223 battles
  • 4,481
  • [FHA] FHA
  • Member since:
    07-08-2010
First post people

turret armour is significantly stronger

And yes i to would have rather wanted an better gun.... T54's problem atm is not the armour, speed, health

its the gun

Falafel #105 Posted 15 June 2012 - 06:21 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 7955 battles
  • 348
  • Member since:
    12-04-2010

View Posttheta0123, on 15 June 2012 - 06:04 PM, said:

First post people

turret armour is significantly stronger

And yes i to would have rather wanted an better gun.... T54's problem atm is not the armour, speed, health

its the gun

I hope that T-62A would have *slightly* better armour and a damn good gun/high top speed and excellent manouverability.
T-54 lost its role as a scout when bat-chat popped-out...

Barkmann #106 Posted 15 June 2012 - 06:34 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14251 battles
  • 185
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View PostFalafel, on 15 June 2012 - 06:21 PM, said:

I hope that T-62A would have *slightly* better armour and a damn good gun/high top speed and excellent manouverability.
T-54 lost its role as a scout when bat-chat popped-out...

In my opinion Meds from Tier 10 shouldnt be seen as a scout. More like fast tanks with less armour and with hight fire power.

Now meds are scouts because they are 9 tier so worse that Tier 10 HTs. On 10 tier meds should have chances to fight agains 10 tiers HTs... not only scouting.

Edited by Barkmann, 15 June 2012 - 07:03 PM.


Falafel #107 Posted 15 June 2012 - 08:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 7955 battles
  • 348
  • Member since:
    12-04-2010

View PostBarkmann, on 15 June 2012 - 06:34 PM, said:

In my opinion Meds from Tier 10 shouldnt be seen as a scout. More like fast tanks with less armour and with hight fire power.

Now meds are scouts because they are 9 tier so worse that Tier 10 HTs. On 10 tier meds should have chances to fight agains 10 tiers HTs... not only scouting.
I dont dare to hope so... It would be extraordinary if meds could actually fight against heavies :Smile-hiding:
Maybe it will happen... And if it happens  guess it will start huge spam of "NERF TIER X TDS AND MEDS!!! THEYRE KILLING OUR TIER X HEVISSSS!!!"
I think that tier X heavies are pretty arrogant in random battles, and they usually get selected into CW first. It would be fun if finally matches wouldnt rely completly on heavy tanks.

Edited by Falafel, 15 June 2012 - 08:10 PM.


gomolj #108 Posted 16 June 2012 - 07:24 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25178 battles
  • 579
  • Member since:
    08-15-2011

View Posttheta0123, on 15 June 2012 - 06:04 PM, said:

First post people

turret armour is significantly stronger

And yes i to would have rather wanted an better gun.... T54's problem atm is not the armour, speed, health

its the gun

I dont get it.... Why does everyone repeat the turret armor is stronger, or even "significantly stronger", when it clearly states that the turret front armor is 185mm (so less the 200mm we have now)? Only the mantlet is 242mm strong. Almost no one shoots the mantlet anyway and if you look at it its really small so it reduces the chance of accidental shots by the enemy. Am I missing something here?

swellgrim #109 Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:47 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17368 battles
  • 56
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011
I thought they bring us T-55 not the T-62...

Sotahullu #110 Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:16 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 15540 battles
  • 684
  • Member since:
    10-15-2010

View Postswellgrim, on 16 June 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

I thought they bring us T-55 not the T-62...

Well, T-55 would be awesome if they bring Biological and nuclear weapons in the game :Smile-bajan2:

And no, they don't bring that T-62 but T-62A. Read the forum and not saying something tha has been sayed earlier -_-

Squadman45 #111 Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:18 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 47860 battles
  • 2,810
  • Member since:
    01-20-2011
This is the question.... WTF WG doesnt give as tier 10 same tier 9 with small buffs??? T-55, M47 are for me a good option, small buffs in armor, firepower and movilty and you have a good tier 10 med because the mission in a med tank IS NOT FACE heavy tanks...... i am scared about WG balance job with meds and TDs tier 10, if they are unable to balance heavies tier 10 in 1 year i dont expect a good job from FailGamer.

SuperBidi #112 Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:32 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 32193 battles
  • 7,447
  • Member since:
    05-31-2011

View Postikiralight, on 14 June 2012 - 04:43 PM, said:

Exactly my point. Comparing it to the stats of an object is idiotic, they serve different roles. The T110 fulfils quite a few of the roles that mediums generally take. It has good DPM, accuracy and aiming time; making it great for support. It can brawl pretty well because it's turning speed is by no means slow and the front armor is great. It can relocate quite fast because it's by no means slow.

I don't think T110 fulfills any of the role a med fulfills. It's too slow to relocate fast, so it can hardly stop an enemy fast cap, or change front when it's needed. It has average traverse speed and turret traverse speed. So, in close quarter, it can't easily circle Mauses and TDs. If you want to do an arty rush with a T110, I wish you good luck. And as a scout (nearly a primary role for medium), it's plain bad. That's why I showed you BL-10's stats, it's because T110, T-62A and Object just don't have the same role.
A med will never beat a heavy 1V1. That's because they have mobility. Meds can easily go on a 2V1 fight against heavies, coming back to your base before the enemy other front heavies even reach it.
Meds are scaring arties, arties scare your T110, and T110 scares meds. Looks like a good design to me.

CommunistPoweredUtopia #113 Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:21 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2544 battles
  • 52
  • [CY-CY] CY-CY
  • Member since:
    08-31-2011
ok so there is a serious problem here, and with some of the other tier 10 meds, but i dont think its because WoT dont know how to balance them (and they have no idea how) its because almost all of the candidates for T 10 Mediums fall in to the category of MBTs, even the fictional ones. They could easily have picked, say, the T 64, but that would outclass the vast majority of the T 10 heavies, and arguably so would have the T 62. the only T 10 med which is going to work well, as in work in its inteded role as a T 10 med, is the bat chat.

Squadman45 #114 Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:21 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 47860 battles
  • 2,810
  • Member since:
    01-20-2011
T-55, M47 are not MBT and Leo I and AMX30 prototypes are far from be true MBTs because they dont have a great armor... for me is a question of balance, using the previous meds they dont need do a lot of balance, only small buffs in main areas are enough, they only need work a little with the other 2, think that a medium tank is based in shock tactics using movility, they can snipe to but main dange in meds are when they use movility to overun enemy tanks in bad situations.

We need wait and see but i dont expect see a good balance in new tier 10.

Legault #115 Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:30 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 14706 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010

View PostSuperBidi, on 16 June 2012 - 09:32 AM, said:

I don't think T110 fulfills any of the role a med fulfills. It's too slow to relocate fast, so it can hardly stop an enemy fast cap, or change front when it's needed. It has average traverse speed and turret traverse speed. So, in close quarter, it can't easily circle Mauses and TDs. If you want to do an arty rush with a T110, I wish you good luck. And as a scout (nearly a primary role for medium), it's plain bad. That's why I showed you BL-10's stats, it's because T110, T-62A and Object just don't have the same role.
A med will never beat a heavy 1V1. That's because they have mobility. Meds can easily go on a 2V1 fight against heavies, coming back to your base before the enemy other front heavies even reach it.
Meds are scaring arties, arties scare your T110, and T110 scares meds. Looks like a good design to me.
Except that the russian mediums eat heavy tanks alive, and completely suck versus other mediums and arty hunting. You leave that to the batchats/1390s. Patton and E50 aren't arty hunters or scouts either. Compare the T110 to what the Patton and E50 do. You'll see that it's not far off.


And medium tanks can beat heavy tanks if they track them repeatedly and circle them. The end of that came with the T110 and IS8, which are closer to medium tanks.


Tier 10 medium tanks will be useless. The roles you say they should fulfil are taken by batchat. The only reason they're coming with tier 10 mediums and TDs is because they want them to be viable in CWs. They're better off removing all medium trees but french if what you say is true, unless you want to have a dedicated mouse circler on your team.

SirWili #116 Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25830 battles
  • 1,303
  • [WOOF] WOOF
  • Member since:
    02-05-2011
Overlord told us in Q&A that the tier 9 mediums will be nerfed. We allready know what nerf the E50 will get; frontal gearbox. It still remains secret what nerfs will be given to Patton and T54.

He told also that these nerfs will become because nowadays tier 9 mediums are more like tier 9 1/2. So the oncoming tier 10 mediums will be just a little more powerfull than todays tier 9´s.

He mentioned the E50M and it´ll get small buffs to gun, little more mobility and HP, and the gearbox in back. Don´t really know what will be the differencies between t54 and t62a but could imagine that it´ll be more or less similar. If the top speed will be reduced then it´ll be compensated most likely by giving it better manoverability.

theta0123 #117 Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:08 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 8223 battles
  • 4,481
  • [FHA] FHA
  • Member since:
    07-08-2010

View Postswellgrim, on 16 June 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

I thought they bring us T-55 not the T-62...

The T-55 would not be an improvement over the first model of T-54 currently ingame.

In reality the T-55 was a gigantic improvement over the T-54. But ingame this cant be implented

mamlas #118 Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 14704 battles
  • 656
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View PostSirWili, on 16 June 2012 - 11:45 AM, said:

Overlord told us in Q&A that the tier 9 mediums will be nerfed. We allready know what nerf the E50 will get; frontal gearbox. It still remains secret what nerfs will be given to Patton and T54.

I think T-54 has been pre-nerfed enough in the last year. Tbh i cant see what they could nerf and still warrant its spot on T9. You nerf it anymore, and the T-44 in fact becomes superior to it:D

And to the guy that thinks T110 doesnt creep into med territory, just lol.

SirWili #119 Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25830 battles
  • 1,303
  • [WOOF] WOOF
  • Member since:
    02-05-2011
Well... He allreaydy told that tier 9 mediums will get a nerf. I think that it will also mean that their MM value is lowered as well as the MM battle tiers now 11,12,13 ( I think it´ll be after the update 10,11, and 12) It´s also likely that these changes will also affect the income and expenses of the current tanks. Same thing for tier 9 td´s They all will get probably (sligtly) nerfed.

So in the end you´ll get a weaker tier 9 mediums and TDs which has lesser expenses with more positive MM. This causes the tier 8 mediums to lose some of their their effectivenes on games because they will meet more tier 9 mediums and tds.

Overlord said that even there are lots of tier 10 tanks coming in 7.5. It´ll be mainly balancing update...

I really cant say how they could nerf the t-54, maybe mobility again? T-62A wasn´t as mobile as T-54-55, maybe they want to change the russian end tier medium tanks more to brawling role because BatChat and lorraine will be fast and manoverable and act as scout? Just an educated guess. It´ll be nice to see whats really going to happen.

edit: typos

Edited by SirWili, 16 June 2012 - 02:29 PM.


Legault #120 Posted 16 June 2012 - 06:18 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 14706 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010
If the T-54 gets it's mobility nerfed it'll be the most useless russian medium tank. It's by no means fast as it is. The gun is sh** as it is, so that leaves armor... and if that gets nerfed it'll be worse than the T-44.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users