Jump to content


The T-62A fact sheet


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
206 replies to this topic

Anthoniusii #21 Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:10 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23972 battles
  • 1,312
  • Member since:
    03-25-2011
T-62 will be a credit eater...
Imagine if T-54 has the cost of use and fight that in unbearable then you can have an idea of th euse cost for T-62.
And the D-54 name shows that the gun will sufair from the same inaccuracy the main D-54 has!!
So what's the point to buy a tank that it will have to reach in 0 distance from the tier X mosters to hit them?

oldstyleh #22 Posted 12 June 2012 - 11:05 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11902 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011
simple story: Y u want armor? Go heavy.

Atomic_Emu #23 Posted 12 June 2012 - 11:12 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 10893 battles
  • 407
  • Member since:
    12-02-2010

View PostAnthoniusii, on 12 June 2012 - 09:10 AM, said:

T-62 will be a credit eater...
Imagine if T-54 has the cost of use and fight that in unbearable then you can have an idea of th euse cost for T-62.
And the D-54 name shows that the gun will sufair from the same inaccuracy the main D-54 has!!
So what's the point to buy a tank that it will have to reach in 0 distance from the tier X mosters to hit them?
It is logical to assume that they will rebalance the economy for tier 8/9 meds and TDs.
The gun is going to be D-54TS, where "S" stands for "stabilized", suggesting better accuracy on the move.
Nothing is sure, of course, and until we get our hands on 7.5 public test, we can only speculate.

Edited by Atomic_Emu, 12 June 2012 - 01:58 PM.


Lord_WC #24 Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:03 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18655 battles
  • 3,277
  • Member since:
    02-21-2011
Well, it still looks better than the iron brick or turreted turd, but that's all I expect.

Sure, beta t-54 was OP I agree. They balanced t-54 afterwards, that's fine as well. But since then all his opponents has moved DOWN a tier and against the new opponents t-54 cannot compete. It's an expensive (if you shoot a really expensive), small profile scout and that's all. Brawler? Hah, funny thing the sniper tank has better armor and much-much higher health pool than the brawler. And that the brawler has the least dpm of all. Brawler...

Oh, yeah, good at taking out e100 and mauses, but that's all.

And yes, I played t-54 a lot. I'm doing quite good with it. Yet, with other nations t8 meds I absolutely have no problems to take it out. I don't think this will change when I'll have the t9s. Or the t10s for that matter. I got a feeling that due to the insane amounts of german whine WG carefully underbalances russian tanks - statistics clearly prove this point.

Tank_killer99 #25 Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6673 battles
  • 204
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011
it looks exactly as the T54 just with less frontal armor and some more HP :Smile_veryhappy:
the devs are ruining the Russian tree :Smile-angry:

oldstyleh #26 Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11902 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011
Conclusion: everyones cries for getting their own tank nerfed and are happy for the nerfs of the tanks they dont have. Specific tanks have their own specific advantages and disadvantages. Looks like most whiners want their tank to be uber at all areas.

GehakteMolen #27 Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:43 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 51741 battles
  • 3,169
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-08-2010
this tank will get beta stats + more hp + better gun, this tank is fine

retarded quick track repair time, so detracking is pointless in 1vs1, say hit 2 sec repair time + ``magic`` front armor, = it bounces alle guns with less then 220mm + on the move accuracy of a patton + camo of an 704 = pwnage tank

beta T54 was almost equal to tier X tank, if they just give that stats to T62 with more hp, and better gun (more dpm and tiny penetratiom buff) the tank is fine....

oldstyleh #28 Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11902 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011

View PostGehakteMolen, on 12 June 2012 - 12:43 PM, said:

this tank will get beta stats + more hp + better gun, this tank is fine

retarded quick track repair time, so detracking is pointless in 1vs1, say hit 2 sec repair time + ``magic`` front armor, = it bounces alle guns with less then 220mm + on the move accuracy of a patton + camo of an 704 = pwnage tank

beta T54 was almost equal to tier X tank, if they just give that stats to T62 with more hp, and better gun (more dpm and tiny penetratiom buff) the tank is fine....
Yep, and the final performance of tank will depend on a driver skills.

Edited by oldstyleh, 12 June 2012 - 02:04 PM.


Campaign #29 Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 3556 battles
  • 138
  • Member since:
    07-23-2010

View PostObiWanKenobi, on 11 June 2012 - 06:18 PM, said:

i hate the fact it looks almost the same as T54,same thing with new E50....

New vehicles done cheap. This has been in fashion for quite awhile in this game. Thats not completely bad though since it reduces the amount of bugs that the new hulls have

Lord_WC #30 Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18655 battles
  • 3,277
  • Member since:
    02-21-2011

View Postoldstyleh, on 12 June 2012 - 12:56 PM, said:

Yep, and the final performance of tank will depends on a driver skills.

Not everyone in this game cries hard and long when they drive a tank that is lesser than its competition you know.

Anyways, I'd rather like to have your oppinon on what advantages the t-54 has beside low profile compared to e50 and patton. I'm sure it will be enlightening.

Edited by Lord_WC, 12 June 2012 - 01:13 PM.


Shadrack #31 Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 40687 battles
  • 875
  • Member since:
    07-21-2010
Got a question
When t-62a comes out what will happend with ours t54 in garage?
Are we gonna get t10 for free or must grind with t54 ?

Legault #32 Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:54 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 14706 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010
As long as it's agile and has a respectable amount of penetration and DPM... it'll do it's job. But the fact that all t10 mediums are copies of the t9s is still pretty dumb.


And nothing changes. Ofcourse you don't get a free tier 10 vehicle. The T54 is still a tier 9 medium.

oldstyleh #33 Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11902 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011

View PostLord_WC, on 12 June 2012 - 01:12 PM, said:

Not everyone in this game cries hard and long when they drive a tank that is lesser than its competition you know.

Anyways, I'd rather like to have your oppinon on what advantages the t-54 has beside low profile compared to e50 and patton. I'm sure it will be enlightening.
And what advantages has E50 besides its good gun?

Legault #34 Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:55 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 14706 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010

View Postoldstyleh, on 12 June 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:

And what advantages has E50 besides its good gun?
Uh, a better gun isn't exactly a small deal? Derp?


Accuracy, aiming time, alpha, ramming power, frontal armor, view range, HP.

oldstyleh #35 Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11902 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011

View Postikiralight, on 12 June 2012 - 02:55 PM, said:

Uh, a better gun isn't exactly a small deal? Derp?


Accuracy, aiming time, alpha, ramming power, frontal armor, view range, HP.
Point is that these both tanks has different roles. t-54 better at close-range, but e50 is better at long range. Yep, ramming is cool, but until ur against skilled player. Good player would detrack you and violla all enemies can make some ventilation holes in ur side armor. And I wouldnt talk about armor, coz new guns can punch holes everywhere.
Well I might change my POV when ill get one for myself. Thats my opinion for now.

Edited by oldstyleh, 12 June 2012 - 03:08 PM.


Hornet331 #36 Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:03 PM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 16285 battles
  • 3,922
  • Member since:
    07-31-2010
And now WG realizes that it was a crap idea to go with a hybrid T54/55/62... suddenly the hybrid T54 we have in game is better then the supposed T62(A) :Smile_teethhappy:

Legault #37 Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:21 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 14706 battles
  • 2,342
  • Member since:
    10-11-2010

View Postoldstyleh, on 12 June 2012 - 03:03 PM, said:

Point is that these both tanks has different roles. t-54 better at close-range, but e50 is better at long range. Yep, ramming is cool, but until ur against skilled player. Good player would detrack you and violla all enemies can make some ventilation holes in ur side armor. And I wouldnt talk about armor, coz new guns can punch holes everywhere.
Well I might change my POV when ill get one for myself. Thats my opinion for now.
Armor is actually important. It's what made everyone whine about the old T-54, because it was immune to lower tiers.


And yes, good players detrack you. It's why brawling doesn't work and why the T-54 doesn't work, lol. It's not fast enough to brawl most things, and it doesn't have the damage output to back it up either. It can track and circle some tanks in some situations yes, but in general? You'll find out when you get yours.

Lord_WC #38 Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:57 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18655 battles
  • 3,277
  • Member since:
    02-21-2011

View Postoldstyleh, on 12 June 2012 - 03:03 PM, said:

Point is that these both tanks has different roles. t-54 better at close-range, but e50 is better at long range. Yep, ramming is cool, but until ur against skilled player. Good player would detrack you and violla all enemies can make some ventilation holes in ur side armor. And I wouldnt talk about armor, coz new guns can punch holes everywhere.
Well I might change my POV when ill get one for myself. Thats my opinion for now.

And I respect that, but as far as I can see e50 currently sports a better frontal hull armor than t54, the dpm a bit higher WITH 20% better accuracy (which would directly translate to better accuracy on the move) AND 40% better aim time. To back this low dpm (since clearly these two tanks have the lowest of the bunch) e50 has some 10% bigger hp pool.

We are not talking about skilled player vs. noob, those situations are clear, you will rape a clueless player in his e50 with a t50-2. We are talking about comparable situations - and in these situations t54 suffers a huge handicap - it's unable to snipe, and it's unable to brawl. The recent nerfs were especially painful, the height increase lead to a paperthin hull and suddenly you lost the only thing t54 was good at: harassing stuff while bouncing hastly placed shots and trolling the trash. E50 is able to fill these roles much better now.

Yeah, of course, I might change my oppinion about E50 since I nearly got it, but seeing p2 vs t44 (paper stats and gameplay wise) I don't think that has a high chance.

Charcharo #39 Posted 12 June 2012 - 04:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 30744 battles
  • 1,414
  • Member since:
    09-16-2010
I just hope they give the T-62 120mm of frontal armour like the T-54. Please let it be, as I am beginning the grind from T-43 to T-54.

theta0123 #40 Posted 12 June 2012 - 04:59 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 8039 battles
  • 4,481
  • [FHA] FHA
  • Member since:
    07-08-2010

View Postoldstyleh, on 12 June 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:

And what advantages has E50 besides its good gun?
The E50's gun is not good, its way way WAY better then the other T9 medium tanks there gun

The E50 has great armour and let us not forget that 60 ton weight being used in ramming mode

Problem is, most E50 drivers are idiots....




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users