Main page

We are happy to show you our brand new Wargaming video, where Sergey Burkatovski answers a few questions about the game asked by players. Have a look!

Full news text

Thanks for the update and the video looking forward to the Super pershing .

"What will you do for cybersport?"
new modes, better and new websites, better reps but NOTHING about LAN (no LAN= no serious tournaments), smaller random factor (big random factor= no competitive play) and fixing the reg? So you will do nothing for cybersport. Dont pretend that u care about tournaments and/or competitive play.

These questions has been answered in a written form on the forum all ready, exept the new T-50-2 design.

i try to hear what he saying on english, about Pyshic sooo is that thing coming soon at summer ? or someone can explain to me?

im half deaf of cource.. i want have a subtiles on it!
Edited by DrJackSWE, 12 June 2012 - 05:11 PM.

"Own" somebody.
I was waiting for something more formal.

And the info is mostly old, already knew it.

For those not able to access the WOT-page:

Quote

DrJackSWE, on 12 June 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:

There is a news article up on wot-news, google translate said this:

Patch 0.7.5 to the new physics, and rendering.

DrFeelG00d, on 12 June 2012 - 05:15 PM, said:

Thank you so much!

DrFeelG00d, on 12 June 2012 - 05:15 PM, said:

physics yeah lol announced 2 years ago  planned for 7.0 ... honestly after all the devs done missed deadlines and dropped content i cant possibly see how they would manage to code a propper physics version that wont ruin the game and or would be fundamentally flawed and or horribly bugged

interesting he mentions photocopys from "archives" sounds like their info is based on old soviet archive intel ;)

now it all makes sense thats why the russian tanks dont have their historical drawbacks and the german tanks fail so utterly when it comes to armor ^^

the super pershing looks awesome! it depends on the price! if its the same price as the type 59 was, ill buy it!!

The sources of their data is onesided and sometimes doesn't even come close to german trails or even post war trails from the US  (for example 122mm D25-T was much, much weaker in RL and had a hard time to penetrate Panther frontal on 100m if the Panther was slightly angled) ... old news and wargaming is always right ;)

Worst part to hear in this interview: Definitly No plans whatsoever to introduce some kind of skillbased matchmaking like in other MMO ... they really intentionally ignore the customers wishes. Never heard of a company being so thickheaded.

Overvoice dubbed with strong American accent is not very sexy.
Edited by TrackTerror, 12 June 2012 - 06:23 PM.

Not really that interesting I'm afraid, the video died Just as it WAS getting interesting (IE: Japanese tanks).

Equally annoying that the T-50-2 is not getting ditched due to its ridiculous game play, but is just getting a Re-skin.

Solid answers. A bit dissappointed about the T-50-2 solution; just a different body on the same frame.

One question regarding the Super Pershing, how is its overall performance compared to the 'regular' M26? For example, I don't find the Lowe better than a fully upgraded Tiger II. But as the Super Pershing it is a direct 'derivative' of a tech-tree tank it will be better on characteristics as armor and firepower?
Edited by McClane, 12 June 2012 - 06:45 PM.

McClane, on 12 June 2012 - 06:43 PM, said:

There were screenshots with the modules, it used a tier VI engine, with the extra armor (extra weight) that will pretty much mean that it's gonna be slow for a medium tank.

Keep up the good work Sergei!

DrFeelG00d, on 12 June 2012 - 05:15 PM, said:

Google translate is misleading here a little, He was asked if the new T10's will come Before the Physics and Rendering changes, and he said they will be in 7.5, Before those changes.
So 7.5 wont have the new Physics and rendering.

"go own some noobs"

Anyway, the Super Pershing looks very interesting.