73 replies to this topic

[Mafionzo]

Well....Ill get new PC in the end of August (I hope xD) so I dont mind waiting for Physicx another 3-4 months xD

[theghostcat]

majogl, on 14 June 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:

GOD, I hope there will FNALLY be physics in this one

WG is being very careful with physics(as they should be) - they know that they have more to lose then gain if they implement physics in a hasty and untested manor.

[skeeta]

I'm actually quite nervous about physics and I really don't mind them taking their time to make sure its 100% right. It's either going to be a game maker or breaker so I'm happy to carry on as we are now for another 12 months if necessary.

[Ixal]

Grif, on 14 June 2012 - 05:52 PM, said:

You are missing the point, the gun on it is bigger than the above tier tanks in the original tree published. how many would whine if they ground up to the next tier, spent credits to then have a smaller gun?

Wrong.
The gun of the DM is, even in its T6 premium form, comparable to the 107mm of the SU-85 and the new Tier 5 french TD (ARL 44 gun).
So why should it be OP when we already have 2 TDs with that gun?

Oh, I forgot, the DM is German. They can't have guns as good as other nations.

[Nirvana]

It's actually a fair bit bigger. The thing is, going from the DM to the next level, you'd actually get a downgrade in the gun department. That's the whole issue.

I actually don't have an issue with that, but the devs thought it was better to avoid it. So not siding with them, just trying to explain the logic behind the whole thing. You may choose to like it or not.

Edited by Nirvana, 14 June 2012 - 07:20 PM.

[Ixal]

Nirvana, on 14 June 2012 - 07:16 PM, said:

It's actually a fair bit bigger. The thing is, going from the DM to the next level, you'd actually get a downgrade in the gun department. That's the whole issue.

Well, guess they would have to give the T6 Germans a gun comparable to the other nations too. But we can't have that now can we? After all the Jagdpanzer 4 is such a good TD it doesn't need any buffs.

And here are the DM stats.
http://forum.worldof...95#entry2077695

Edited by Ixal, 14 June 2012 - 07:22 PM.

[dimovski]

so what?

[simeoncho]

Szturmi, on 14 June 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:

We don't get new physics in 0.7.5 for sure. It was stated by Overlord and also by SerB.

  read it again   its after 7.5 not in      



http://forum.worldof...ost__p__2123410

Edited by simeoncho, 14 June 2012 - 07:30 PM.

[TiwasAlpha]

I read that the Brits where coming perhaps in the 8.0?
Thats like not untill christmas..

[Ixal]

dimovski, on 14 June 2012 - 07:27 PM, said:

so what?

Sooo
The devs explanation about the DM's gun being too OP for T5 is the leftovers of male cows.

[Generalwulf]

/thanks the gods the "good" (fun tier 2) tanks are "safe" this patch

[Moorglademover]

Looks like the huge amount of credits and free exp, i've amassed, will finally get spent.

Edited by Moorglademover, 14 June 2012 - 07:48 PM.

[Grif]

Ixal, on 14 June 2012 - 07:31 PM, said:

Sooo
The devs explanation about the DM's gun being too OP for T5 is the leftovers of male cows.

They didnt state it as OP.

The point is the Nashorn (that follows it) had the long 8.8 (so when u upgrade u get smaller gun) that is the (sadly oft missed) point

[HubertGruber]

Ixal, on 14 June 2012 - 07:31 PM, said:

Sooo
The devs explanation about the DM's gun being too OP for T5 is the leftovers of male cows.

How long 88 on tier 5 isnt overpowered?

[XxXSpottedYouXxX]

UltraStomp, on 14 June 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:

Dickermax is going to be a premium TD? What is this I don't even... It's supposed to be the 2nd TD line open-top tank, and they're going to put it as a premium?
THey really fucked it up here.

Its a fail tank but actually looks like 100x better then the Fail Panzer 4.

[Ixal]

HubertGruber, on 14 June 2012 - 08:27 PM, said:

How long 88 on tier 5 isnt overpowered?

How 107mm-Zis 6 on tier 5 is ok?
How 105mm 13TR on tier 5 is ok?

[Szturmi]

simeoncho, on 14 June 2012 - 07:27 PM, said:

read it again   its after 7.5 not in  



http://forum.worldof...ost__p__2123410

Read again my post, ok?

[userfriendly]

Taku, on 14 June 2012 - 05:54 PM, said:

I'm really disappointed at WG for putting that T110/T95 hybrid to tier X instead of buffing the T95 to do the job...

Same here. That T110/T95 hybrid abomination should be a tier 8, with the T28 and T95 buffed up to tiers 9 and 10.

There's still time for them to change it...

[Rude_Guy_Games]

OMG! Release those physics, already!

[han_solo_79]

Grif, on 14 June 2012 - 05:52 PM, said:

You are missing the point, the gun on it is bigger than the above tier tanks in the original tree published. how many would whine if they ground up to the next tier, spent credits to then have a smaller gun?

Nope according to topic "Renders of SuperPershing and DickerMax" (something like this) gun on DM will have stats similar (160 pen/300 dmg) to the stats of 107 on SU85. Which obviously is not OP for WG but for part of community it is. Personally i prefer to see that 105 on DM as premium and on Jagd as regular tank (and 107 should be moved on SU100 but i know its senseless to argue...)