Jump to content


How Bold are you ?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
90 replies to this topic

Poll: How Bold are you ? (252 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

How many have you got ?

  1. 0 , I've come here to look down upon you trolls (116 votes [46.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.03%

  2. 1 -2 , I'm still very much new to this , it felt good but I'm a bit apprehensive (59 votes [23.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.41%

  3. 3 - 5 , It's a giant mistake , I'm misunderstood and being persecuted (25 votes [9.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.92%

  4. 6 - 9 , mmmmm I'm on the path to the dark side , I hear they have cookies (17 votes [6.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.75%

  5. 10 , Yup we have cookies (21 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

Vote Hide poll

Aimless #21 Posted 30 July 2012 - 10:17 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 23783 battles
  • 2,694
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-19-2010
q.v. signature (they forgot why they warned me, while I never noticed)

xCaptainObviousx #22 Posted 30 July 2012 - 11:20 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 23222 battles
  • 2,219
  • [4077] 4077
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011

View PostxCaptainObviousx, on 11 June 2012 - 11:21 PM, said:

The new JP E-100 will mount a 15 cm gun
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! EVIL WG NO GIVE JP E-100 17 CM GUN!!!"
The JP E-100 have changed and will mount a 17 cm gun.
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! EVIL WG RUINED IT WITH FAIL GUN!!!"
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! JP E-100 IS CRAP BECAUSE OF PAPER ARMOR!!!!"
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! WE DON'T CARE THAT LEO1 HAVE TIER 4 ARMOR IT'S MUCH BETTER THAN THE IMPROVED E-50!!!"
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! THE PZ3 A IS OP FOR TIER 3, IT'S TIER 4... Oh, wait. Isn't there a difference between the pz3a and the regular pz3? This is the same as with the T-62a and regular T-62 BUT WE DON'T CARE BECAUSE RUSSIA IS OP!!!"
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! GERMAN TANKS FROM 45 IS GETTING PWNED BY FUTURE RUSSIAN TANKS. WHY DON'T EVIL WG GIVE GERMANY 50-60S TANKS (because germany wasn't allowed to produce tanks for 20 years after 1945)!!!!"
This sums up the previous 20 pages so you don't have to waste time reading it.

Please try to be a bit more constructive in your contributions to this thread.  The above really wasn't neccessary and simply stirs up bad feelings by demeaning their opinions.  Consider this a friendly warning.
---Orree

Sometimes i just have to vent a bit after reading 20+ pages of whine about all and everything.

Kuad #23 Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:58 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16259 battles
  • 418
  • Member since:
    03-20-2011
I've only got the one, which surprises me. Possibly because I only swear at or about things and not people.

NatteFrost #24 Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:04 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 8131 battles
  • 2,225
  • Member since:
    08-13-2010
just talk negative about any or all devs here or ingame, and you will get a ban faster then you are able to leave the wot site.

mr3awsome #25 Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:05 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 17455 battles
  • 3,086
  • Member since:
    03-15-2011
i have 4

MrE158 #26 Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27727 battles
  • 336
  • Member since:
    05-22-2011
You're letting your Hiberno-English show through there Phooca, even our buddies across the water to the east get confused with the use of "bold" to mean "naughty".  Best of luck to the non-English speakers on the forum :)

Anyway, I'm on 0.  I don't have a lot of posts though, so that probably helps.

Lord_WC #27 Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:55 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18655 battles
  • 3,277
  • Member since:
    02-21-2011
0, I don't care about trolls, I don't have unhealthy relationship with german tanks and I detest arty, so not much on these forums can annoy me. I usually do mods the favor to proofread my comments before posting and delete nasty words.

And who in their right mind would want to mess with the supreme ruler of toilets anyway?

Sturmtiger_304 #28 Posted 30 July 2012 - 02:08 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 19603 battles
  • 4,081
  • Member since:
    08-18-2010

View PostBullitt, on 27 July 2012 - 04:01 PM, said:

I am bold enough to go where no one has gone before.
4 warnings & my favourite is.

Dear User,
Please bare in mind that young people and children read this forum, and it is no place for pictures like this.
My favourite too.

I'm going the path for the cookies. I heard they're delicius.

laimis20 #29 Posted 30 July 2012 - 02:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 25837 battles
  • 1,417
  • [L-G-N] L-G-N
  • Member since:
    09-12-2010
Yeah I am going for the path of cookies too.

7 for now.
They include - insults, moderator insults, inflammatory comments about devs, bad remarks about WG and a couple of unknown.

OldIronsides #30 Posted 30 July 2012 - 02:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 4297 battles
  • 1,482
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010
3, divided into 2 warnings for swearing, if I remember correctly.

Jerrycan #31 Posted 30 July 2012 - 03:17 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 44931 battles
  • 993
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010
2, One I have no clue what I did to get it and with this line I can't do much: 'Restriction was given for breaking the rule Other in Unknown.'
The other one was the best thread I've created, but it turned out that the devs got a better sense of humor than our mods: http://forum.worldof...ench-tank-crew/

Krajina_Express #32 Posted 30 July 2012 - 03:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 10590 battles
  • 1,387
  • Member since:
    02-28-2011
Three, but It totally want more. My goal is 10.

One for calling people morons, one for saying El Alamein sucked and one for telling WG to shove it.

mr3awsome #33 Posted 30 July 2012 - 03:37 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 17455 battles
  • 3,086
  • Member since:
    03-15-2011

View Postjerrycan, on 30 July 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

2, One I have no clue what I did to get it and with this line I can't do much: 'Restriction was given for breaking the rule Other in Unknown.'
The other one was the best thread I've created, but it turned out that the devs got a better sense of humor than our mods: http://forum.worldof...ench-tank-crew/
EPIC THREAD

ilhilh #34 Posted 30 July 2012 - 03:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27232 battles
  • 2,001
  • [FIFO] FIFO
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

View PostQuakeRiley, on 30 July 2012 - 03:26 PM, said:

Three, but It totally want more. My goal is 10.

Grow up.

mr3awsome #35 Posted 30 July 2012 - 03:50 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 17455 battles
  • 3,086
  • Member since:
    03-15-2011
Anyway i got my for
expressing my opinion like this     http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1992316
Insulting WG
i said that some guy had failed which he took badly (he reported me)  http://forum.worldof...omsearch__1    
and admitting that i had once made a single racist remark

Zalmoxis91 #36 Posted 30 July 2012 - 03:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17361 battles
  • 999
  • [RDDTR] RDDTR
  • Member since:
    06-15-2012
I got 2. All for posts I made praising the community managers and the wonderful events they made recently!

Mordante #37 Posted 30 July 2012 - 04:16 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27629 battles
  • 1,394
  • [-DL-] -DL-
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
10 warning points

01-July 12 Other  0 More Details
23-May 12 Other  0 More Details
04-March 12 Other  0 More Details
23-February 12 Other  0 More Details
05-February 12 Other  1 More Details
23-January 12 Other  1 More Details
18-January 12 Other  1 More Details
09-December 11 Other  1 More Details
05-December 11 Other  1 More Details
04-December 11 Other  0 More Details
26-November 11 Other  1 More Details
13-November 11 Other  1 More Details
04-October 11 Other  1 More Details
30-May 11 Other  1 More Details
30-April 11 Other  1 More Details

Killatomate #38 Posted 30 July 2012 - 04:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19200 battles
  • 1,691
  • Member since:
    05-13-2011
my last warning was for saying that Type-59 is a pay-to-win tank.

im sorry WG, i was drunk and it was an accident. ofc paying to win is not pay-to-win. huuge difference.
paying $40 for having a tank that is impenetrable and steamrolls helpless tier 7 tanks is not pay to win. its pay-to-be-unsportsmanlike.
there. there you have it.

Mr_Thursday #39 Posted 30 July 2012 - 04:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22092 battles
  • 650
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011
1 point and 3 days of read-only for making a joke. Oddly other posts in the thread were more nasty or cruel but I got singled out. Must have hit a raw nerve

Phooca #40 Posted 30 July 2012 - 06:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 281 battles
  • 1,311
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011

View PostMrE158, on 30 July 2012 - 01:46 PM, said:

You're letting your Hiberno-English show through there Phooca, even our buddies across the water to the east get confused with the use of "bold" to mean "naughty".  Best of luck to the non-English speakers on the forum

Ahh feck it anyway :D Never thought about that


Its also freaking annoying getting your 9th warning and another 3 day RO , just 15 min after creating a thread about bans ,
Funny enough though I got the ban for discussing a previous ban , so if BBV sees this we're all screwed :D  


Also didnt know it only goes to ten :/ Getting kinda nervous that i'm just one away from the big One Zero

And a surprising number of people lied on the poll , tisk tisk tisk




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users