KT VS VK45A dmg anomally
Murdeer
17 Aug 2012
KT mounted on the L/68
VK45A mounted on the L/52
why is the KT deal always under the avarage(mosly the minimum roll)?
Vk45a gun is work fine, but the L/68 on the KT is always deal the minimum dmg roll.
i have 400 battle on my kt
anyone notice that too?
VK45A mounted on the L/52
why is the KT deal always under the avarage(mosly the minimum roll)?
Vk45a gun is work fine, but the L/68 on the KT is always deal the minimum dmg roll.
i have 400 battle on my kt
anyone notice that too?
Nekomancer
17 Aug 2012
Not really, i have my share of shots under the average, it's random after all, but i don't see any disadvantage. Also had a very lucky shot when i hit an ELC AMX for the full damage which is identical to it's hit points XD. I was very happy to oneshot a scout without ammo rack crit.
Baja002
17 Aug 2012
It's not an anomaly, it's all about aiming and a bit of luck... VK deals avg dmg most of the time for front attacks, you have to aim better
ChaosAeternus
17 Aug 2012
but on the other hands the amount of under average shots i got last times is really ridiculous. And im not the only one having the same feeling. Especially on KT i got alot of shot under 300 dmg which is crap because i can use 88 and shoot for 230 every 7 secs instead of 9,8
dtham
17 Aug 2012
It's not only at those tanks. I had realy low dmg rolls with BL-10 lately. 3 or 4 shots in the row with low 600ish dmg
It can make your day crappy especially if you have 300ish HP left and some IS-3 is crawling at you with 700 HP and you say yourself that it's a piece of cake and you will blow him like a candle and then he survives with 50 HP and kills you easily because of you looooooooooooooooooong reload


