Jump to content


T62A needs a buff badly!

T62A medium tank

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
140 replies to this topic

Mike_Hammer #21 Posted 05 September 2012 - 06:35 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 26771 battles
  • 1,213
  • Member since:
    09-14-2010
T-62A doesn't need a buff, it needs a total redesign to not be a faggot tank anymore.

zzlzxzzlzx #22 Posted 05 September 2012 - 06:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25177 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-03-2012

View PostMike_Hammer, on 05 September 2012 - 06:35 PM, said:

T-62A doesn't need a buff, it needs a total redesign to not be a faggot tank anymore.
agreed.... it does need a total redesign.....

Pro377 #23 Posted 05 September 2012 - 07:01 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 8307 battles
  • 127
  • Member since:
    06-24-2011

View PostMike_Hammer, on 05 September 2012 - 06:35 PM, said:

T-62A doesn't need a buff, it needs a total redesign to not be a faggot tank anymore.

I fully agree. It is very hard to play that tank and I suck at it. T-54 however is much more fun and they are similar tanks but there a BIG difference in results, at least for me.

zzlzxzzlzx #24 Posted 05 September 2012 - 07:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25177 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-03-2012

View PostPro377, on 05 September 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

I fully agree. It is very hard to play that tank and I suck at it. T-54 however is much more fun and they are similar tanks but there a BIG difference in results, at least for me.
please support this thread if you agree. there are a bunch of people who never played with T62A posting against this thread with non-sensible reasons !

zzlzxzzlzx #25 Posted 05 September 2012 - 07:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25177 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-03-2012
Anyone who posts against my point, please firstly make sure that you at least played T62A.  Please keep silence if you know nothing about this vehicle.
Many thanks.
PS: The majority people (14/19) i know who have T62A though it needs a buff.

corrado_comrade #26 Posted 05 September 2012 - 08:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 29376 battles
  • 612
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View Postzzlzxzzlzx, on 05 September 2012 - 06:01 PM, said:

i can hardly think so that T62a can pen e50m and m48 turret anyday. please check this video http://forum.worldof...ter-than-t-62a/
see? even bounced from the front hull not mention the front turret.

5 battles with the T-62A :Smile_teethhappy:

please.. go back watching videos... no need to argue with you about stuff you don't obviously know. and btw, that T-62A managed to bounce on a standing still E-50M at 200 meters. good test. :Smile_teethhappy:

Chiliboy_Ralepelle #27 Posted 06 September 2012 - 12:13 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17884 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    07-21-2011
I think if there was one improvement i would like to see on the T-62A it would be faster speed in reverse, as at the moment it is horrendously bad.

psycho063 #28 Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:19 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 40408 battles
  • 68
  • Member since:
    08-09-2010
It needs a better engine! It shines when you can get close to your opponent and "facehug" him BUT you need speed to do that. Right now, at that tier it's armor is worthless, apart from the turret ofc...

Kbok #29 Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:26 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10006 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    05-24-2011
T-62a isnt that bad; it´s just more a glass cannon; it doesnt bounce anything (beside turret), but imho it´s still nice tank to play (a blast vs most of the german tanks & tds).

As far as I know, with the 0,8-patch WG will change the effective armor (you can read about it: http://wotarmory.com/2012/09/03/); so before many of you start to complain about the t-62a just wait the next patch.

mamlas #30 Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:51 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 14704 battles
  • 656
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View Postcorrado_comrade, on 05 September 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:

please.. go back watching videos... no need to argue with you about stuff you don't obviously know. and btw, that T-62A managed to bounce on a standing still E-50M at 200 meters. good test. :Smile_teethhappy:

not saying he played it well. But E50M is 200mm effective without side-angle, it can in fact create enough to slope to bounce low-rolls on upper front on that distance quite easily.

And to T-62A, its rather bad. Repair times suck, mobility is mediocre, armor is non existent, still no gun depression, the alpha-dmg is joke, horrible module dmg...
You basically have slower batchat, that can turn without needing to slow to crawl. With more module dmg and without the gun.

Its doesn't belong in russian medium line at all.

Spahpanzer_Kommandant #31 Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:53 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39626 battles
  • 1,125
  • [321ST] 321ST
  • Member since:
    07-18-2011
Perfectly balanced tank, zero buffs needed.
Doing well according to server stats.
Case closed.

zzlzxzzlzx #32 Posted 06 September 2012 - 11:02 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25177 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-03-2012

View PostSzlejer, on 06 September 2012 - 10:53 AM, said:

Perfectly balanced tank, zero buffs needed.
Doing well according to server stats.
Case closed.
please send a link to the server stats you mentioned. is that official server stats from WOT??

corrado_comrade #33 Posted 06 September 2012 - 11:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 29376 battles
  • 612
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View Postmamlas, on 06 September 2012 - 10:51 AM, said:



not saying he played it well. But E50M is 200mm effective without side-angle, it can in fact create enough to slope to bounce low-rolls on upper front on that distance quite easily.

And to T-62A, its rather bad. Repair times suck, mobility is mediocre, armor is non existent, still no gun depression, the alpha-dmg is joke, horrible module dmg...
You basically have slower batchat, that can turn without needing to slow to crawl. With more module dmg and without the gun.

Its doesn't belong in russian medium line at all.

then i'm rather stupid having almost 3k average DPB on the T-62A. 5.45s reload, deadeye, aim the engine = burn baby burn profit

Spahpanzer_Kommandant #34 Posted 06 September 2012 - 11:15 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39626 battles
  • 1,125
  • [321ST] 321ST
  • Member since:
    07-18-2011

View Postzzlzxzzlzx, on 06 September 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:

please send a link to the server stats you mentioned. is that official server stats from WOT??
http://wot-news.com/...rver/eu/norm/en

Last 4 weeks - EU

E-50 Ausf.M 49.94 %
M48A1 52.13 %
T-62A 52.12 %
Bat Chat 49.81 %

RU server

E50_Ausf_M 50.75 %
M48A1 55.23 %
T62A 50.58 %
Bat Chat 50.11 %

US server

E-50 Ausf.M 48.75 %
M48A1 50.86 %
T-62A 51.88 %
Bat Chat  49.75 %

Edited by Szlejer, 06 September 2012 - 11:20 AM.


zzlzxzzlzx #35 Posted 06 September 2012 - 12:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25177 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-03-2012
upup

Edited by zzlzxzzlzx, 06 September 2012 - 01:46 PM.


Firecam #36 Posted 07 September 2012 - 07:14 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27974 battles
  • 1,416
  • Member since:
    10-22-2011

View Postzzlzxzzlzx, on 05 September 2012 - 05:57 PM, said:

you are making the point that amx50B needs a nerf. I can see no point from here why batchat is weak.  Compare batchat with other tier X meds, its engine power, mobility, agile, and that imba france gun. in addition, batchat as a med has 65 speed limit which is faster than the most of lights such as t50 chaffee? Batchat is obviously overpowered as many other france tanks.

LOL ... 0 games played on BatChat, of course, but you know everything.

zzlzxzzlzx #37 Posted 07 September 2012 - 07:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25177 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-03-2012

View PostWaterContainer, on 07 September 2012 - 07:14 PM, said:

LOL ... 0 games played on BatChat, of course, but you know everything.
i dont have one with my account doesn't mean i haven't played with it! i tried with my friend's batcaht many times and it was obviously overpowered. in addition, i am not the one who brought batchat in this debate. Moreover, if you want a debate on batchat go out from this forum. this is set up for T62A not for france tanks. Thanks for cooperation.

Edited by zzlzxzzlzx, 07 September 2012 - 07:29 PM.


CuddlyPanda #38 Posted 07 September 2012 - 07:45 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21298 battles
  • 1,635
  • Member since:
    07-06-2011

View Postzzlzxzzlzx, on 05 September 2012 - 04:54 PM, said:

T-62A:
+ impressive DPS and good enough penetration
+ impressive scout potential (good combination of view range, profile, and camo)
- horrible frontal armor
- sluggish, about as slow as the type 59
Too slow to realistically scout, too poorly armored to fight front on, too russian to snipe. Its got great dps but no way to really use it. The only real use for this tank I can see is in zergpack rushes that will still be less effective than a T110 rush or so on. Disappointingly bad."

M48A1 (7.5 and 8.0)
+impressive DPM and penetration values
- extra larger in size
- extra poor armor allround
- slow
- no scout potential, again due to the large size

"Too russian to snipe.", LoL what???? It has better accuracy than the M48A1 and when 8.0 goes live, the M48 will have the same aim time as the T62a. Now tell me why the M48 has a stunning global WR that it will be nerfed in terms of RoF, aim time and accuracy on the move? Simple, better players in platoons pwn everything ingame. Better tactics, better understanding of the map, etc. Players make the tank good! So, pls rant all you want, the T62a is a fine tank and I love mine. Try to platoon, try not to rush like in the T54, its not a T54!, try to use your 3000 DPM! Simply, learn to play.

george_smiley #39 Posted 15 September 2012 - 11:52 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 125
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Beautiful traverse and no problem penetrating anything. I noticed i really accelerate fast on level terrain, faster than the T-54. Just equip with fill tanks with CO2 (mandatory to fix the frontal fuel tank fires). Not a problem with the armor actually, anything in tier X will Penetrate you except if you're an IS-7, Maus or T110E3. Might as well as go with this fast firing tank. Just needs teamwork actually. This is the machine gun of the team. You can hide behind heavies, wait for the rounds to fly (and thus, the 22 second reload of everyone) then pump 3 rounds on them and hide again. Repeat until end of game. :Smile_veryhappy:

Spruty #40 Posted 15 September 2012 - 02:37 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16165 battles
  • 190
  • Member since:
    11-20-2010
T62 needs a buff imo after comparing it to the M48A1 (after 8.0 nerfs) and the Batchat on the test server.

Ya the gun with its good accuracy is definately the biggest pro for this tank but having bascially no gun depression, awful accerleration and armor which can be penetrated by tier 6 tanks make this tank hard to utilize.

Thanks for the test server... At least now i know that i definately want a M48A1 and a Batchat. The gun on the american med is slightly worse but the agility of the tank combined with an awsome gun depression, great accuracy while moving make it the better tank by far. Shame on those 200k XP i spend on the T62a.

Edited by Spruty, 15 September 2012 - 02:37 PM.






Also tagged with T62A, medium, tank

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users