Jump to content


Developer Q&A: the Russian answers


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
5477 replies to this topic

Czergus #5461 Posted 03 April 2013 - 01:47 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8134 battles
  • 237
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012
Strom:
- Distance, from which your vehicle can be detected, does not depend on how many your visibility points are open. It does not matter if your tank stands complitely open or only top of tiny commander turret is visible from the bush. Enemy will see you from the same distance
- More low level russian TD is planned to add to the game, like SU-45 nebo GAZ-75.

Czergus #5462 Posted 04 April 2013 - 02:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8134 battles
  • 237
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012
Fixed MM for LT in 0.8.5. means, that there will be equal (or almost equal) number of light tanks on both sides. So situations, when one side have spotters and the other one dos not should not happen.
If you caused critical damage for some module for the first time (so module state became red) - you will get bonus for experience.

Czergus #5463 Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:24 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8134 battles
  • 237
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012
Unball here says, that in future players will see something like EFR rating, displayed in game. What is now available as an additional EFR mod will become part of the game interface.

Czergus #5464 Posted 25 April 2013 - 10:58 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8134 battles
  • 237
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012
Storm:
Known problem with private chat room (window sometimes can not be closed - user has to restart client) will not be fixed with any micro patch in 0.8.5.
Although game engine allows the possibility to pull stucked vehicle WG does not plan to implement this feature.
At this moment WG works on relyable method to renew tank crew, that was lost due to account hack. In fututre it will be not possible, to dismiss crew member with the simple click on the single button in crew member file.

SerB
New algorithm of calculating visibility of the vehicle will take into account weather conditions. Snow, fog and so on will reduce range, on which the vehicle can be detected.

Czergus #5465 Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:24 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8134 battles
  • 237
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012
Storm:

Maus is a good vehicle, we do not plan to make any serious changes in it. What was promissed by one of our developer during tests of 0.8.4. are very minor changes. But even they are not firmly planned.
In the second half of the year will come new premium 8 tier vehicles and, among other new maps, completely reworked Serene Coast and Komarin. They will not appear in the first half of the year.
Sexton was moved from 0.8.5 to 0.8.6 because they still rebalance all arty and therefore have had to change sexton as well.

Edited by Czergus, 26 April 2013 - 08:51 AM.


Opferlamm113 #5466 Posted 26 April 2013 - 03:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26968 battles
  • 751
  • [300] 300
  • Member since:
    09-03-2011
you do know that SS doesn´t want someone to hijack his old thread.

dUG1 #5467 Posted 26 April 2013 - 04:02 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29482 battles
  • 1,036
  • Member since:
    05-01-2011
Yup, leave it to die guys.

WG EU simply doesnt deserve it, while we players got a new way of getting Q&A news  :blinky:

Czergus #5468 Posted 26 April 2013 - 04:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8134 battles
  • 237
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012
1. I do not see this as a hijack. It was a good project and it is a pity, that it was stoped.
2. Since SS twisted my own words in this very thread I do not care much about what he wants. Times when I was protecting him on unofficial cz forums are long gone. As long as he was running this thread I stayed away, cause it was more important to keep this working, but now he got himself banned. Community needs this thread so I do my best in here. Despite the fact I can not do it as well as he did. But I can do at least something.
3. Unlike SS I will not spam this thread with my or his personal issues. This is my first and last post, going off-topic here.

Hustodemon #5469 Posted 26 April 2013 - 11:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6880 battles
  • 357
  • [CSK] CSK
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011

View PostCzergus, on 26 April 2013 - 04:04 PM, said:

...
2. Since SS twisted my own words in this very thread I do not care much about what he wants.
...

May I ask where, exactly? And why didn't you defend yourself?

johnny_k2 #5470 Posted 27 April 2013 - 10:09 AM

    Colonel

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 15252 battles
  • 3,973
  • Member since:
    12-06-2011
If you use the link in the edited startpost you will reach over links from a mod of the SEA-server the translations of the russian Q&A (search the blue SS).
If czergus wants to publish translations in the forum, he should start his own thread.

Dead_Skin_Mask #5471 Posted 27 April 2013 - 11:00 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12695 battles
  • 1,484
  • Member since:
    05-19-2011

View PostCzergus, on 26 April 2013 - 04:04 PM, said:

1. I do not see this as a hijack. It was a good project and it is a pity, that it was stoped.

Dear Czergus, I think that it will be better if you start your own thread. Here you will always have serious problems with people, who like SilentStalker and will try to defend him, even if you do not want to attack him.

qrak01 #5472 Posted 27 April 2013 - 11:48 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 10284 battles
  • 298
  • [SKWOT] SKWOT
  • Member since:
    07-24-2010

View PostCzergus, on 26 April 2013 - 04:04 PM, said:

1. I do not see this as a hijack. It was a good project and it is a pity, that it was stoped.
(...)
As far as I know this "project" wasn't entirely stopped. SilentStalker is still translating daily Q&A on his blog. Posting link to that site here is prohibited, but everyone can easily find that certain place using google (for the record, its on blogspot).
Anyway, probably everyone (including me) visiting this topic just stopped and moved to the blog. If there's someone new to whole Q&A thing: I strongly advise to visit official Russian thread, or that certain stalkers site. Eventually you can visit NA forums. Here (EU forums) we don't have anything even remotely close Overlord's or SilentStalker's blog standards.

I appreciate your efforts Czergus. But... if you really want to start new topic, or bring back to life this one, you have to try harder.

The_Original_Goatz #5473 Posted 27 April 2013 - 12:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23417 battles
  • 563
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011
Czergus get out maybe? Your translations were poor and full of fail. Bringing This topic back out of spite was not cool.

banszel #5474 Posted 27 April 2013 - 01:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17944 battles
  • 30
  • Member since:
    02-14-2012
[edited]

Edited by Kacsa1, 27 April 2013 - 06:08 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. Kacsa1


Stokkolm #5475 Posted 27 April 2013 - 01:47 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12029 battles
  • 1,543
  • Member since:
    04-28-2011
If someone followed the Q&A on SilentStalker's blog, did the developers answer why Comet and VK30.02D have mm weights of heavies?

_X_X_X_X_ #5476 Posted 27 April 2013 - 08:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15353 battles
  • 521
  • Member since:
    10-20-2011
nope, there wasn't anything on MM weights for a pretty long time.
Usually tanks get increased weight if they are borderline OP ;-)
(look at mini maus...)

Fidelocastro #5477 Posted 23 July 2013 - 09:00 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20622 battles
  • 29
  • [RF-1] RF-1
  • Member since:
    04-17-2011
Why won't you give us a proper 5th crew member for Mt-25 instead of just 100%?Or is that just to reduce the number of light tanks in these games?People won't drive the MT-25 with 4 crew members having 400% or more and the 5th will be just rubbish 100% without BiA.There's not much time left and there's still time to fix this.Just give the 5th crew member stats of the worst member of these other four.It's easy.

Conte_Vincero #5478 Posted 24 July 2013 - 08:41 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10402 battles
  • 1,894
  • [BAOR] BAOR
  • Member since:
    11-10-2011

View PostFidelocastro, on 23 July 2013 - 09:00 PM, said:

Why won't you give us a proper 5th crew member for Mt-25 instead of just 100%?Or is that just to reduce the number of light tanks in these games?People won't drive the MT-25 with 4 crew members having 400% or more and the 5th will be just rubbish 100% without BiA.There's not much time left and there's still time to fix this.Just give the 5th crew member stats of the worst member of these other four.It's easy.
Why are you posting in this thread, it's been dead ever since SS was banned, and even when he was around the devs didn't read it. The official feedback threads are where you should be posting.




26 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 26 guests, 0 anonymous users