Jump to content


T-28 to T-35


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
6 replies to this topic

Poll: T-28 or T-35? (4 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

should it be the...

  1. T-28 (1 vote [25.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. T-35 (3 votes [75.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

Vote Hide poll

Frits97 #1 Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:16 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3565 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    10-20-2011
The idea would be that the T-28 Soviet medium tank by the T-35 Soviet heavy tank...

make the t-46 medium and let it lead to the t-35 heavy....

some back ground on the tanks:

T-35
Spoiler                     

T-46
Spoiler                     

T-28
Spoiler                     

Let me know what you all think and awnser the poll

/Frits97

MarshallEnd #2 Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:28 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 8275 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    11-23-2010
If you saw the Tank Tree for Soviet, then you would see that T-35 is going to be a Premium Tank and T-46-5 is Tier 4 medium tank

Rook_PL #3 Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19521 battles
  • 125
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011
Any multiturrets would be great (btw. when they will finally start working on it?), but T-35 is meant to be premium. See official tech tree.
Besides I don't see any reason not to have them both in the tree (if you're proposing to replace one with another).

Frits97 #4 Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:37 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3565 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    10-20-2011

View PostMarshallEnd, on 25 October 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:

If you saw the Tank Tree for Soviet, then you would see that T-35 is going to be a Premium Tank and T-46-5 is Tier 4 medium tank

I know but that won't make sense.... that just like the other problem in it: kv-1 leads to t-150 leads to kv-3..... Why thid they put the kv-2 to the arty line, because the s-51 was based on its hull (witch is the same (in theorie) as the kv-1's) so why not put the T-150 in the Kv-2's place and swop them... would make more sence... this is the same thing....

they also thidn't put on it that they are going to make t-50-2 into Mototank MT-25.. so it would be possible!

MarshallEnd #5 Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:49 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 8275 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    11-23-2010
Just like Panther don't lead to GW Panther and Jagdpanther
allso T-150 was based on kv-1 hull

Frits97 #6 Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:53 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3565 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    10-20-2011

View PostMarshallEnd, on 25 October 2012 - 03:49 PM, said:

Just like Panther don't lead to GW Panther and Jagdpanther
allso T-150 was based on kv-1 hull

It was just an example..... my point was to say that there are more things incorrect... like that they want to let the T-46-5 be a tier 4.....

And it would just be more logic if you just had Kv-1 -> Kv-2 _> Kv-3...

MarshallEnd #7 Posted 25 October 2012 - 04:00 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 8275 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    11-23-2010
it would be logic, yes.
and if there was going to add year with the tier line then hetzer would be Tier 7

the issue is that they would have to redo the tier like kv-1 > kv-13 > IS and kv-1 > kv-1s > S-51

so it would be logic, but WG they mess up from the start when there started on the Tank Tree's, and it would seem that it's to late to fix it now.

Edited by MarshallEnd, 25 October 2012 - 04:24 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users