Jump to content


WG WOT PR


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
22 replies to this topic

Poll: Rate like in school: 1=best, 5=worst (173 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

WG public relations, communication between WG and wot community

  1. 1 (41 votes [23.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.70%

  2. 2 (39 votes [22.54%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.54%

  3. 3 (38 votes [21.97%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.97%

  4. 4 (28 votes [16.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.18%

  5. 5 (27 votes [15.61%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.61%

Vote Hide poll

Murphy1up #21 Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:42 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Military Reserve
  • 11249 battles
  • 7,278
  • [-QQ-] -QQ-
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View PostPooinClingfilm, on 20 November 2012 - 01:42 PM, said:

Has there ever been any talk about matchmaking based on modules/tank upgrades?

There's a world of difference between a freshly bought craptanks and an upgraded model.

True, but there we can't have 6 or 7 different matchmaking arrangements for every single tank.

Stock Tiger
Tiger with upgraded tracks and engine
Tiger with upgraded tracks, engine and turret
Tiger with upgraded tracks engine, turret and gun 1
Tiger with upgraded tracks engine, turret and top gun with gold ammo
etc etc.  

You could be there all day making the system even more complex.

If there wasn't an incentive to upgrade a stock tank, why would you do it?  You'd just research modules and then buy your next tank, never purchasing new modules.

View PostCubicTwo, on 20 November 2012 - 01:50 PM, said:

"[Gold ammo] On most player based polls, the majority of players are either only using a few shells, or not using them at all"
I don't understand this. Why a poll, which can be biased? WG should get real numbers from the servers/software easily.

Perhaps we already have and the numbers from the servers are totally different to what players assume, hence why gold ammo for credits hasn't been pulled in 0.8.2. Have you considered that?   :Smile_Default:

XxXSpottedYouXxX #22 Posted 20 November 2012 - 05:39 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 23824 battles
  • 8,336
  • [4077] 4077
  • Member since:
    05-05-2011
Go and look at the RU Store  :Smile_trollface-3: ...

Then compare it to ours.

Aerious2 #23 Posted 26 November 2012 - 11:30 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15869 battles
  • 105
  • Member since:
    09-21-2011
Didn't look at the scale and voted 4 (bad) instead of 2 (Good) :( It's not perfect as sometimes news are a little bit too late, but I would say it's quite decent. For example:

The questions raised - They have been answered sooo many times, that asking them once more is a plain display of your lack of will to do a very basic search. If you do not want to put a little effort in searching, why would mods bother with answering your questions? And yet, we did have Ectar answer them once more.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users