Jump to content


NoobMeter.com - WoT performance rating (player comparison tool)

noobmeter performance rating efficiency noobmeter.com performance rating efficiency rating

  • Please log in to reply
1393 replies to this topic

KawaGreen #1141 Posted 07 November 2013 - 03:00 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 11732 battles
  • 2,124
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011
Yeah also got issues with average tier above 10.

Slind #1142 Posted 07 November 2013 - 06:58 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34422 battles
  • 910
  • [FIREX] FIREX
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011
Looks like WG fixed their feed, my battles with A-32 popped up today. I hope they fixed it for all the gift tanks and that it stays working...

Bumbleweed #1143 Posted 07 November 2013 - 07:29 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9633 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    01-21-2012
I also have messed up stats with an average tier at 70+... Is this a WG problem or a problem with Noobmeter? I suspect it is a WG thing as my overall stats on the efficiency calculator were also lowered. I hope this bug gets fixed soon, cos atm it looks like I am an 800 eff player over the last 7 days :(

Slind #1144 Posted 08 November 2013 - 12:24 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34422 battles
  • 910
  • [FIREX] FIREX
  • Member since:
    02-16-2011
That didn't last long, A-32 battles are missing again and my average tier for yesterday is 111.

Fr4akadelle #1145 Posted 12 November 2013 - 12:12 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18375 battles
  • 717
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
Looks like WN8 is working again, even for last 1k battles. Right?

weu #1146 Posted 12 November 2013 - 03:57 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17746 battles
  • 4,096
  • Member since:
    08-25-2012

View PostSchnudi, on 12 November 2013 - 12:12 PM, said:

Looks like WN8 is working again, even for last 1k battles. Right?
Hmm... I am not quite sure it does - I didn't play the critical tanks in the past so the dozen ganes I played seem to be less important ... I still think there is an issue within the database, but I am not sure.

NoobMeter #1147 Posted 12 November 2013 - 07:11 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1 battle
  • 536
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
I issued a WN8 recalculation request so issues should be resolved.

Bumbleweed #1148 Posted 12 November 2013 - 08:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9633 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    01-21-2012
It wasn't just Wn8, but all stats that take into account average tier... in fact it was my Performance rating that was hit the hardest. Hope it gets resolved :)

CipherGalmOne #1149 Posted 14 November 2013 - 09:56 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17740 battles
  • 123
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
Bat 155 58 isn't being counted as a top tier anymore.

Edited by CipherGalmOne, 14 November 2013 - 09:57 AM.


torquato1978 #1150 Posted 14 November 2013 - 10:31 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6937 battles
  • 3
  • [ITRA] ITRA
  • Member since:
    05-11-2013
I have the same problem, I try to loggarmi by section europe and gives me login failed, my nik is torquato1978

Staalorm_ #1151 Posted 14 November 2013 - 02:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1140 battles
  • 1
  • [2PAC] 2PAC
  • Member since:
    05-06-2013

View Posttorquato1978, on 14 November 2013 - 10:31 AM, said:

I have the same problem, I try to loggarmi by section europe and gives me login failed, my nik is torquato1978
Yeah I cant login either using any of the available options. vOv

Dead_Zombie #1152 Posted 14 November 2013 - 05:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    08-14-2013
Is it possible to include the "tank compny" battles played when you look at each individual session? I know the front page has the overall amount of tank company battles.. but was wondering if it could be separated in the "sessions" as well.. thx

duncanita #1153 Posted 14 November 2013 - 09:11 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2800 battles
  • 24
  • [SDS-A] SDS-A
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013
I can't login. I tried faceboo, google, twitter and WOW EU, any suggestion?

BRICE #1154 Posted 14 November 2013 - 09:36 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 14102 battles
  • 842
  • [P0W] P0W
  • Member since:
    08-21-2010
I like the site. Allthough i dont play much at all in recent times.
People will always argue, especially when its about numbers and statistics.
-
From what i can remember from all other sites i have been on that track your own/others stats i think the general "result" has been slightly different each time, but not so much that i can say i notice a huge differance.
-
With all changes to the game since closed beta when i started, i still find that the basics for good "stats" hold true, with lesser fixes and tweaks.
Every aspect of any statistic can be changed and tampered with to produce a new result.
-
I usually gather data from all availible sites and add it up and divide it between how many results i have added. x+x+x=y/3=z
To get average number.
Maybe its wrong, but thats how i do it. In the end i dont curse myself to much over numbers, when i have a fun game to play.

Edited by BRICE, 14 November 2013 - 09:38 PM.


csi1578 #1155 Posted 14 November 2013 - 10:42 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19452 battles
  • 1
  • [210] 210
  • Member since:
    10-14-2012
i have also the problem that i can't login. try several ways, always the same "Login failed"
Nick csi1578
Server EU
any ideas?

DuX91 #1156 Posted 15 November 2013 - 03:38 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18659 battles
  • 93
  • [-ONE-] -ONE-
  • Member since:
    07-31-2012
i have 2 questions ( sorry if someone already ask this) :
in next version of wn formulas (9,10...) , is it possible to put damage upon detecting , or assist dmg , cuz e.g - i played today battle with more that 12k dmg upon detecting( malinovka ) , and when i check my stats for that battle it show me nothing special though i was main factor for victory...and then i played battle with 7-8 decap points and for that i have great stats  :mellows:
and will ingame xvm mods show wn8  ,  when final version come ?

Kuchiki_Byakuya #1157 Posted 15 November 2013 - 03:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5524 battles
  • 450
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    01-01-2012
http://www.noobmeter...tank/502041332/
I recently got an account wipe and apparently this broke noobmeter for my stats.. they're still frozen from 1 day before my account got wiped and they didn't change at all since then.. does anyone know what i have to do so they update again? :amazed:

Mextli #1158 Posted 17 November 2013 - 12:33 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26005 battles
  • 2,513
  • Member since:
    11-01-2011
Actual noobmeter has huge problems to find new players, very often I get the following message doesnt find any name I enter: "Player ..... not found on the EU server, please ensure the spelling is precise".

And btw. could someone finally change the behaviour of the 'enter name' box? Its so fucking annoyning that a click inside doesnt clear the text in it it like its the usual behaviour of text boxes...

Skandalf #1159 Posted 17 November 2013 - 05:02 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11002 battles
  • 52
  • [WNK] WNK
  • Member since:
    09-25-2011
I have a problem with that WN8 rating. As i know (maybe i'm wrong), spotting for damage is not couted in this rating. Do you know, that players who usually scout for arties or others, will play harder to deal a damage? They will no bother to scout "to win", they will hunt to get some points off the game.
I might be wrong, but it looks like i see it.
P.S. I tested that, and looks like dealing ie 500dmg and 1 frag is better for that statistics then 1-2kdmg from spotting.

Edited by Skandalf, 17 November 2013 - 05:16 PM.


Zmurcht #1160 Posted 18 November 2013 - 01:42 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23169 battles
  • 449
  • [TES-F] TES-F
  • Member since:
    09-24-2011

View PostSkandalf, on 17 November 2013 - 05:02 PM, said:

I have a problem with that WN8 rating. As i know (maybe i'm wrong), spotting for damage is not couted in this rating. Do you know, that players who usually scout for arties or others, will play harder to deal a damage? They will no bother to scout "to win", they will hunt to get some points off the game.
I might be wrong, but it looks like i see it.
P.S. I tested that, and looks like dealing ie 500dmg and 1 frag is better for that statistics then 1-2kdmg from spotting.
spotting damage is not in the stats cos WG has no data for it other than in the results screen.
thats why winrate is in the formula as well, good players (no matter what type of tank) will win more cos they know how to help the team. Also (first) spotted tanks get used iirc, that means even suicide scouts get something.
Ofc 500 dmg and 1 kill is more than 2k spotting with that kinda system. Even more so if you compare only one game to another, noone can calculate winchance with one example. its either 0 or 100%. Impossible to get data for spotting.
The system is not perfect, its the best approach.
What im actually here for:
I was wondering if you guys could just get rid of efficeny rating ie. wiping it from the page. Ive seen players still working towards getting it up. (Maus sitting behind base "just in case", not that bad of a player from his other stats tho)
Today i started off with 2300eff cos i had a defender game after like 5 battles (going all across the map for it), afterwards it went down slowly to around 1500 after 30 battles. Last game of the evening i just went for the last remaining 2 donks who thought the can cap against 8, got 33 def points and my eff went up 200 points from one game out of 30.
Everyone knows its a rating very easy to work around, just get decap every game.
Hats off for the guys who first came up with it, but its getting old and not needed. Im not sure about WN8 yet, WN7 has done well for quite some time and PR is also not bad, but noone who has a clue about the game really looks at ER.
Would also save some memory space i guess?

Edited by Zmurcht, 18 November 2013 - 01:45 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users