Jump to content


NoobMeter.com - WoT performance rating (player comparison tool)

noobmeter performance rating efficiency noobmeter.com performance rating efficiency rating

  • Please log in to reply
1295 replies to this topic

Imaduffus #861 Posted 16 July 2013 - 12:12 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 14001 battles
  • 310
  • [PZK-X] PZK-X
  • Member since:
    12-14-2010
Hey there,

would it be possible to add "last 1000 battles" to clanview too? http://www.noobmeter...-EKR-/500013028 or at least make it somehow customable or so?

Thanks!

weu #862 Posted 17 July 2013 - 08:21 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14860 battles
  • 3,228
  • [WASSA] WASSA
  • Member since:
    08-25-2012
Strange WN7 differences came into my mind as I saw the signature at WOTLabs and Noobmeter. While noobmeter displays 1134 still as "average" WotLabs seems to display it as "good" (green -> green means good in my opinion). Is there any general idea at which value the WN7 has a "good" value?

Posted Image

scuffer #863 Posted 17 July 2013 - 09:05 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6337 battles
  • 616
  • [BDGR] BDGR
  • Member since:
    07-31-2012

View Posteserim_eu, on 12 July 2013 - 05:28 PM, said:

Ok finally battled my WN7 over 700 yet still showing as "bad"  :sad:

Please, below average, surely/
Well 'bad' is below averagfe :D

Anyway, it's going up, that's the important thing.

Fr4akadelle #864 Posted 17 July 2013 - 09:05 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17356 battles
  • 717
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View Postweu, on 17 July 2013 - 08:21 AM, said:

Strange WN7 differences came into my mind as I saw the signature at WOTLabs and Noobmeter. While noobmeter displays 1134 still as "average" WotLabs seems to display it as "good" (green -> green means good in my opinion). Is there any general idea at which value the WN7 has a "good" value?

Posted Image

There are some differcences in scales.

I think this one from Wot-news is good (right bottom corner):

http://wot-news.com/stat/calc/en/ru


Scale from noobmeters PR:

Q. What are some general guidelines for evaluating performance rating?
A. In general, although these may be reevaluated later:
Less than 1150 - bad player
1150 to 1250 - below average player
1250 to 1450 - average player
1450 to 1750 - good player
1750 to 1950 - great player
1950 to 2000 - excellent player
More than 2000 - "Unicum"

Edited by Schnudi, 17 July 2013 - 09:07 AM.


weu #865 Posted 17 July 2013 - 09:15 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14860 battles
  • 3,228
  • [WASSA] WASSA
  • Member since:
    08-25-2012
@Schnudi
that's only about noobmeters Performance Rating (PR) which also takes overall tank statistics into consideration - but not generally accepted as value providing rating. As the IG tools such as XVM only refer to WN6 resp. WN7 I was looking for a unified scale on that. If I take WOT-NEWS as reference, 1175 would be the tip to be a good player. But right now there is no allignment between the tools as it seems. I wanted to know which value is taken into consideration at noobmeter and if they could allign with some others.

Fr4akadelle #866 Posted 17 July 2013 - 10:49 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17356 battles
  • 717
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View Postweu, on 17 July 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:

@Schnudi
that's only about noobmeters Performance Rating (PR) which also takes overall tank statistics into consideration - but not generally accepted as value providing rating. As the IG tools such as XVM only refer to WN6 resp. WN7 I was looking for a unified scale on that. If I take WOT-NEWS as reference, 1175 would be the tip to be a good player. But right now there is no allignment between the tools as it seems. I wanted to know which value is taken into consideration at noobmeter and if they could allign with some others.

Yes, second Scale is like I said PR only.

As far as I know, there is no 100 % unified scale. There are small differences on every statistics page.

Wotlabs values are set quite low e.g.

MordorFool #867 Posted 17 July 2013 - 12:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 26023 battles
  • 92
  • [-BBK-] -BBK-
  • Member since:
    01-19-2011
I have been grinding the Chinese lines and the French TD line therefore I got a steady drop in my stats which is normal.

But I also decided to change my playstyle and by doing so I end up dealing more dmg and getting more XP but at the same time getting less kills and less decaps.
now that the grind is almost over, I wonder why my WN6-WN7 stats are dropping so much....

Should I go back ot my pure heavies so that I can once more get more kills?

Not that I care that much, just wondering

RogueWraith909 #868 Posted 18 July 2013 - 06:16 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4948 battles
  • 73
  • [-UTC-] -UTC-
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013
Interesting, it isn't showing almost half my battles for the TOG 2...  I actually have 99 so far (might increase today though).

VeryRisky #869 Posted 19 July 2013 - 11:06 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8697 battles
  • 4,505
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012
Just noticed in someone's stats that the LeFH premium arty is still showing as T4 rather than T5.

Consilium #870 Posted 19 July 2013 - 11:37 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16354 battles
  • 781
  • [DKAII] DKAII
  • Member since:
    07-15-2011

View Postweu, on 17 July 2013 - 08:21 AM, said:

Strange WN7 differences came into my mind as I saw the signature at WOTLabs and Noobmeter. While noobmeter displays 1134 still as "average" WotLabs seems to display it as "good" (green -> green means good in my opinion). Is there any general idea at which value the WN7 has a "good" value?

1134 is not good. Its exactly what can be called "decent". Nothing fancy, but no shame either..

weu #871 Posted 24 July 2013 - 10:22 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14860 battles
  • 3,228
  • [WASSA] WASSA
  • Member since:
    08-25-2012

View PostConsilium, on 19 July 2013 - 11:37 AM, said:

1134 is not good. Its exactly what can be called "decent". Nothing fancy, but no shame either..
I totally agree :), it was just strange to see it marked as green within WOTLabs signature. I am a great fan of colors and green means "good" in my opinion. But anyway, I was just currious.

@Noobmeter
What's wrong with the site right now? It did not actualize last night/this morning? Stuck due to Server Upgrades?

jprother #872 Posted 25 July 2013 - 07:16 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 24981 battles
  • 16
  • [ORLY] ORLY
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
Is there anything wrong with the server my recent battles is showing that my average tier is 25???

CipherGalmOne #873 Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:08 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16803 battles
  • 119
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
http://www.noobmeter...20130725_040024
I laughed a bit, 40 battles played. 980xp avg, 2K damage avg, 6.7 tier average (even though I haven't played below tier 7 for a couple weeks now).

Edited by CipherGalmOne, 26 July 2013 - 09:38 AM.


silezero #874 Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:34 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 26670 battles
  • 15
  • [TA-RE] TA-RE
  • Member since:
    03-02-2012
This has to be wrong...

http://www.noobmeter...20130725_032408

jle01 #875 Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:50 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10220 battles
  • 16
  • [METEL] METEL
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012
Weird... Adjusted Avg.tier: 13.97
And i didnt play a game in MT-25 yesterday but still it shows that i played 18 games in it....

jprother #876 Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:07 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 24981 battles
  • 16
  • [ORLY] ORLY
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
wonder if the latest patch has messed things up

weu #877 Posted 26 July 2013 - 09:26 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14860 battles
  • 3,228
  • [WASSA] WASSA
  • Member since:
    08-25-2012

View Postjprother, on 25 July 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:

wonder if the latest patch has messed things up

It did. All the external tools need to adjust. T-50-2 was a Tier 5, MT-25 now is Tier 6. So the systems get confused as WG sends both tanks with the same ID (as far as I assume). So the system adds up the numbers and divides it by battles played -> way to high average tier... I think we just need to wait until all is fixed.

CipherGalmOne #878 Posted 26 July 2013 - 09:42 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16803 battles
  • 119
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    08-05-2011
I see the M60's are not being returned to the snapshots as actual tanks, so you can add those to your tickets of the "Inconsistent data in WG feed" :p
(unless I'm just impatient and it always takes a couple of days for tanks to show up on the roster)

Edited by CipherGalmOne, 26 July 2013 - 09:43 AM.


SuperBidi #879 Posted 27 July 2013 - 08:50 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22026 battles
  • 4,902
  • [MADFR] MADFR
  • Member since:
    05-31-2011
I have a question, and there are 45 pages to go through, so, could you give me a hint on where to find that :
Is there somewhere an overall description of your algorythm ?

Edited by SuperBidi, 27 July 2013 - 08:54 PM.


besterich27 #880 Posted 27 July 2013 - 08:56 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6529 battles
  • 234
  • [KIA2] KIA2
  • Member since:
    07-20-2012
Tank specific stats would be nice..




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users