Jump to content


New System

pc performance system fps

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
13 replies to this topic

Poll: New System (12 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Which is best system for gaming ?

  1. 1st system (3 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. 2nd system (2 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  3. 3rd system (7 votes [58.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 58.33%

Vote Hide poll

Pradatoru #1 Posted 26 December 2012 - 06:55 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43045 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Which of the systems can handle games like WOT / GTA 4 / BF3 on ultra without problems ?

1)AMD FX-4130, 3800MHz, 4MB,
8GB DDR3
Gainward nVidia GeForce GTX650 Ti, 1024MB, GDDR5, 128bit,


2)Intel® CoreTM i5 3570, 3400MHz, 6MB
8GB DDR3
Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 7770 Vapor-X, 1024MB, GDDR5, 128bit,

3)Intel® CoreTM i5-3470 3200MHz, IvyBridge, 6MB,
8GB DDR3
Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 7770, 1024MB, GDDR5, 128bit,


Comment if you know about them ....

spacemancraw #2 Posted 26 December 2012 - 06:58 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19134 battles
  • 338
  • [UNIAV] UNIAV
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011
dont know if on ultra but from these 3   the 3rd is best

my opinion  :Smile_blinky:

iulian95rosu #3 Posted 26 December 2012 - 08:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15612 battles
  • 270
  • [RD-WS] RD-WS
  • Member since:
    07-26-2011
I choose the 3rd system.

Pradatoru #4 Posted 26 December 2012 - 09:14 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43045 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Is this becouse of the IvyBridge Procesor ?

spacemancraw #5 Posted 27 December 2012 - 03:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19134 battles
  • 338
  • [UNIAV] UNIAV
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011
Mainly because of it cuz other components are same only this processor is best ;-)

CrySpy #6 Posted 27 December 2012 - 05:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21857 battles
  • 1,001
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    04-07-2011
Did OP switch the second and third alternative? If not I would like to tell you that the second alternative's CPU is better than the third.
They are both in the same series, i 5 3xxx, and thus the model number should tell you which is the better one, not to mention the clock speeds are directly comparable since they the same architecture.

The 650 ti seems to perform better in most games, or equal to the 7770. Some exceptions, though.
The i5s destory the fx-4300.


I do not know which system will perform better. The performance will vary and it all really depends on whether the AMD will be a bottle neck or not. Seeing that the second alternative also got a fabric OC in the gfx card it(the card) will perform slightly better

BF3 loves nvidia cards, WOT utilizes only one CPU core and thus loves single threaded performance. GTA4 is a horrible port and in general needs plenty of juice to run well. If you can change the configurations of these systems I would strongly recommend you to pick the second system with a 650 ti. If not, go for the second system.

Pradatoru #7 Posted 28 December 2012 - 01:54 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43045 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Thanks for your detailed answer  

Yag0 #8 Posted 28 December 2012 - 03:27 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 3168 battles
  • 3,420
  • Member since:
    04-24-2012
I read somewhere there is a large difference in thermal performance between the ivy and sandy bridge cores .
Anyone else know of this ??

Tonyb1968 #9 Posted 28 December 2012 - 03:56 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27420 battles
  • 1,422
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011
System 2 as both are ivy bridge cpu's and system 2's is more powerful then that is the choice to go for really.
GPU wise AMD make better GPU's than Nvidia at the moment, most of it is down to preference to which you prefer, the more important bits are the mother board and memory speed, what boot drive are you using (SSD or normal HDD) and operating system (32 or 64bit).

Tony :Smile_Default:

PS i should have mentioned that im with the guy above re the cpu, AMD's really suck compared to the intel i5.

Edited by Tonyb1968, 28 December 2012 - 03:59 PM.


Tonyb1968 #10 Posted 28 December 2012 - 04:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27420 battles
  • 1,422
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011
I borrowed this off a test between the 2, really I dont think you will go far wrong with either graphics card but it is up to you (there isnt much in it money wise)

Quote

Conclusion
Nvidia has made some significant progress in the £120 segment. Compared to the GeForce GTX 550 Ti, the new GeForce GTX 650 Ti is considerably faster, sometimes even twice as fast.
Nvidia is positioning the new card against the Radeon HD 7770, but it's not an entirely fair comparison since that card you can find for £100 and the recommended price of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti is £119. It is likely that Nvidia's card will drop in price a few weeks after launch, but right now it's more expensive. The performance difference is pretty significant, however, with an average of 23.9 percent. It's the difference between a game being playable and unplayable.
Nvidia is introducing the GTX 650 Ti as the most affordable choice for Full HD gaming. And this is indeed possible, with medium or normal settings. Full HD on a Radeon HD 7770 is not a good idea, however, the frame rate just isn't high enough.
If you want to ensure a smooth Full HD gaming experience, we would recommend spending a little bit more and instead buy a GeForce GTX 660, 660 Ti or AMD Radeon HD 7850. If you don't mind reducing the quality at times, then the 650 Ti is an affordable Full HD gaming solution.
Out of the three 650 Ti cards we tested, the MSI card stood out due to its silent nature. It has only 1 GB of video memory, which also makes it cheaper. The fastest card is the Zotac AMP! edition, but the 2 GB memory also makes it more expensive. For about £150 you can also buy a Radeon HD 7850 which is generally a bit faster. In the end, the deciding factor will be how the different cards are priced a while after launch.
Bottomline, we were impressed by the GTX 650 Ti. Nvidia has managed to provide very good performance in this price segment, and this we can only applaud.


CrySpy #11 Posted 28 December 2012 - 09:06 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21857 battles
  • 1,001
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    04-07-2011

View PostYag0, on 28 December 2012 - 03:27 PM, said:

I read somewhere there is a large difference in thermal performance between the ivy and sandy bridge cores .
Anyone else know of this ??

It is given. Ivy is a shrink of Sandy giving Ivy more heat density. Also the way the heat spreader and the die is connected differs, with Ivy left with the worse option.
According to wikipedia this gives a 10 degrees Celcius difference when overclocking

Sandy bridge wasn't a hot CPU to begin with, so I believe this isn't too much of an issue but for the very hardcore.

TheKroo #12 Posted 31 December 2012 - 07:00 AM

    Product Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 10290 battles
  • 5,653
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    08-24-2010
Any of these configurations will run WoT at max details nicely.

But I would avoid AMD CPU based configuration. Games are currently more suited for Intel based i5 and i7 CPU's.
So I would go with 2nd or 3rd configuration. Both are CPU's are good.

i_waar #13 Posted 01 January 2013 - 12:18 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 28111 battles
  • 85
  • [BAT-S] BAT-S
  • Member since:
    10-22-2011
Not just games, all apps ar more suted with Intel CPU. on the other side, i got some better exp with AMD GPU then nVIDIA for the WoT playing
But from the other side. i have an AMD based laptop, and no problem with this game :)

Edited by needzha1, 01 January 2013 - 12:19 AM.


Pradatoru #14 Posted 03 January 2013 - 04:46 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43045 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Thanks for all your answers but I decided to go on this system :

Intel Core i5 3570 3,4GHz
Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 2GB Dual-x (for future crossfire)
8GB Ram
850W





Also tagged with pc, performance, system, fps

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users