Jump to content


Competition here we come


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
25 replies to this topic

Ivica60 #1 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    11-29-2011
And of we goooo :)   http://www.youtube.c...d&v=5BWqTXoNjtQ

And off we goooooo to the off topic section, since this isn't gameplay related in the slightest...
- Ectar

Edited by Ectar, 29 January 2013 - 03:24 PM.


Mindexe #2 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:45 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 32252 battles
  • 120
  • Member since:
    08-08-2010
And?

miljac #3 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16174 battles
  • 425
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
installed and waiting for them to include playable tanks and ships as advertised. when that happens wot is in big trouble!

Radu6 #4 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 24946 battles
  • 665
  • Member since:
    08-18-2010
It blows world of warplanes out of the water. Not that such achievement would be hard to do since Wowp sucks ass.

WoTDaFoCh #5 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:47 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 22802 battles
  • 2,133
  • Member since:
    11-13-2010
Competition is good........maybe we get better specials etc when its full release is announced to keep player base here :Smile_glasses:

Superstar31 #6 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:49 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13215 battles
  • 290
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011
I think whatever that game is I think that every player that played more than 6k battles will stay with WG cus game is still awesome(this is my oponion). Maybe Wowp is not that good like WOT (not even close but graphics are pretty nice), but please they are making the game that will not pass like WOT(just talking about tanks) in good sense, WOT is the first idea and a lot people will stay in WOT consistent to the idea that leads us through the finest hours of gameplay.  :Smile_Default:

Edited by Superstar31, 28 January 2013 - 07:50 PM.


Crusaderx #7 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10171 battles
  • 82
  • Member since:
    05-25-2011
Healthy competition benefits us in the long run, so just enjoy both games.

Kazadar #8 Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13204 battles
  • 672
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View Postmiljac, on 28 January 2013 - 07:46 PM, said:

installed and waiting for them to include playable tanks and ships as advertised. when that happens wot is in big trouble!
I can just imagine the whine threads once planes and ships starts oneshotting your tank. And you thought arty was bad  :Smile-hiding:

RavenDeBlade #9 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 29449 battles
  • 658
  • Member since:
    01-23-2011
Played closed beta for awhile and WOT will loose to them... They did what WOT should have done before...

difdaf123 #10 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1882 battles
  • 20
  • Member since:
    01-08-2012
What milijac said, I am gonna hate planes and ships just pwning you all the time. Especially bombers. They are gonna be a massive problem if they drop nukes.

Chocolover #11 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13337 battles
  • 267
  • Member since:
    10-10-2011
I was in the closed beta of World of warplanes and war thunder and i liked warplanes alot more.
But i think both aren't good at this time.

war thunder also has big troubles with a lot of hardware (it wasn't my failure! believe me)

Porta111 #12 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:28 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 59497 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    07-10-2011
Already signed up with them waiting for TANKZ!

RD11 #13 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29847 battles
  • 606
  • [AWAL] AWAL
  • Member since:
    08-01-2011
Gaijin Ent - WG     1-0

rixto003 #14 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:33 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 17776 battles
  • 711
  • [MNQD] MNQD
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011
well alltough it is better than WoWp, WoWp will still put up a pretty good competition (bigger launching playerbase allready, works better on older computers, integration with WoT and stuff like that)

TigerMoth #15 Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39504 battles
  • 906
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011
I much prefer the controls in War Thunder than World of Planes.  However, I have always liked tanks, so unless they include a submarine (my second passion) in War Thunder, they won't drag me away just yet.

Cotton_Meadow #16 Posted 28 January 2013 - 09:17 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9284 battles
  • 476
  • [NLWGG] NLWGG
  • Member since:
    06-13-2012
I played War Thunder for awhile aswell, but i prefer WoT over it.
Not cause WoT is better or so, i just prefer the gameplay with tanks over planes.
However, i agree that War Thunder does alot things better than WoT but not on the battlefield but in the garage/hangar and everything beside.
-Crew keeps their training for any plane it trained for.
-On that account the crew skill is far better worked out and allows specializing to a higher degree than skills/perks.
-Premium account gives DOUBLE XP.
-Awards in xp rather than just a medal, (having the most assist gives +2000xp for example, in WoT that would be a Confederate medal)
-and some others i can't think of atm but i'm sure others have/will point them out.


But besides all that, i still gonna stick with my armoured beasts on the ground  :Smile_Default:
Though i realy hope that WG is gonna take a look at War Thunder and notices what makes people flock to that game and adapt it into WoT

P.S.: On the subject of WoWP, War Thunder is far superior and if i would like playing with planes as much as with tanks i'd much rather go with War Thunder.

St4n #17 Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19505 battles
  • 956
  • [WU36] WU36
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
What makes this game much better than WoT?
PvE
Bad teams make you sad? Do a solo-mission.
You pay too much repairs? Do a solo-mission.
You want some relaxed fun where you will not lose? Do a solo-mission.
You want some relaxed fun with others? Do a coop-mission.
After a lot of solo and coop you want some competition? Play PvP.
Since nearly every MMO has a PvE-part I wonder why WoT doesn't try to get on-par with them... I know, WoT has the monopol on tanks, but that will not hold forever. Especially if players are not bound to tanks specifically.
I know there is this serverspace-argument, but has WG to pay tripple the amounts for serverspace than any other game that actually has PvE (with the terrible high amount of serverspace needed for that *sarcasm off*) or why is this only an argument for WoT?

Edited by St4n, 28 January 2013 - 10:31 PM.


Mindexe #18 Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:48 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 32252 battles
  • 120
  • Member since:
    08-08-2010
Explain to me how you would imagine PvE in WoT. And no, not even close to nearly all MMO have PvE aspect: Dota 2, LoL, PlanetSide 2, DUST 514, Tribes, MechWarrior Online to name few.

Cotton_Meadow #19 Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:56 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9284 battles
  • 476
  • [NLWGG] NLWGG
  • Member since:
    06-13-2012

View PostMindexe, on 28 January 2013 - 10:48 PM, said:

Explain to me how you would imagine PvE in WoT. And no, not even close to nearly all MMO have PvE aspect: Dota 2, LoL, PlanetSide 2, DUST 514, Tribes, MechWarrior Online to name few.

Same way as War Thunder does it, a re-enactment of a historical battle in wich you play a tank/plane while the rest is controlled by AI.
I don't know what's so hard to imagine about it, take any FPS with a solo campaign set in any war (CoD, BF, MoH, whatever you hate less/like most) and replace the squad you play as with tanks, et voila.

Woel #20 Posted 28 January 2013 - 11:04 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24260 battles
  • 1,355
  • Member since:
    01-27-2012

View PostSt4n, on 28 January 2013 - 10:29 PM, said:

What makes this game much better than WoT?
PvE
Bad teams make you sad? Do a solo-mission.
You pay too much repairs? Do a solo-mission.
You want some relaxed fun where you will not lose? Do a solo-mission.
You want some relaxed fun with others? Do a coop-mission.
After a lot of solo and coop you want some competition? Play PvP.
Since nearly every MMO has a PvE-part I wonder why WoT doesn't try to get on-par with them... I know, WoT has the monopol on tanks, but that will not hold forever. Especially if players are not bound to tanks specifically.
It's probably up to personal opinions, but honestly I'm glad that WoT doesn't have "PvE". This way it's crowded with players in randoms/TCs/CWs, there's always a bit of competition included which brings all the fun. Also I'm not sure how would it end up if WG tried to create any basic AI even.
I tried War Thunder, while it's not bad at all I'm not so crazy about it as everyone seems to be on these forums (might change my opinions when tanks will come, not that much interested in planes).Oh, and graphics seemed rather glitchy on my PC, didn't look any further into it though.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users