Jump to content


Double Barrel Tech Tree


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
32 replies to this topic

UberJager #1 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:36 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 25678 battles
  • 4,468
  • [RDR] RDR
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010
Have a little idea
Germans Special Double barrel tree.
+ More Accury, More Gun velocity, More shell, High firing rate
- Less Damage , Less Penetration.

Guns:

35 mm guns : 60 mm Penetration Rof : 26
55 mm guns : 116 mm Oenetration Rof : 26
70 mm L70 guns : 150 mm Penetration Rof : 16
70 mm L100 guns : 196 mm Penetration Rof : 16
88 mm L71 guns : 203 mm Penetration Rof : 16
88 mm L100 guns : 220 mm Penetration Rof 20
105 mm L68 guns : 295 mm Penetration Rof 12


Tier 5 35 mm Double Barrel
Posted Image


Tier 6 55 mm Double Barrel
Posted Image



Tier 7 stoch : 55 mm Double Barrel  top:  75 mm L70 Double Barrel
Posted Image


Tier 8  Stoch Double 75mm L70 Top Double 75 mm L100
Posted Image


Tier 9 Stoch 88 mm L70 Double Barrel Top 88 mm L100 Double Barrel
Posted Image


Tier 10 Stoch 88 mm L100 Double Barrel Top 105 mm L70 Double Barrel
Posted Image

Edited by UberJager, 04 February 2013 - 04:46 PM.


izroda #2 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:40 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 7932 battles
  • 894
  • Member since:
    07-24-2010
Posted Image

Felipki #3 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:41 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3620 battles
  • 213
  • Member since:
    05-04-2012
Lets double every tank's power! Overpower! No.

playec1992 #4 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:42 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11150 battles
  • 1,219
  • Member since:
    05-21-2011

View Postizroda, on 04 February 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

Posted Image

DAFUQ?!?

izroda #5 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:45 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 7932 battles
  • 894
  • Member since:
    07-24-2010
Command and Conquer Red Alert 2 apocalypse tank

Posted Image

suru94 #6 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:48 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18196 battles
  • 28
  • [D-CD] D-CD
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011
Why not? The tank from first pic could be tier XI  :Smile-playing:
I don't think it's bad idea about it (something new in game), but one problem - why E-100 is tier IX? It will have the same armor as his realistic version?
Second pic - Dear Santa...

Edited by suru94, 04 February 2013 - 04:48 PM.


ponka76123 #7 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:52 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21551 battles
  • 322
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011
Double the Gun,double the Fun. :Smile-izmena:

2alertred #8 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:53 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13706 battles
  • 2,358
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View Postizroda, on 04 February 2013 - 04:45 PM, said:

Command and Conquer Red Alert 2 apocalypse tank

Posted Image


The instrument of doom!
It is day of judgement!
Armaggeddon is here
Soviet power supreme
Annihilating
They will roam in fear
I cast a deadly shadow
It will soon be a wasteland
Excellent!
Be patient
Eradicate them
The end is at hand
These will be your last moments
Taste your mortality
The Apocalypse has begun!
Bringing down the hammer

How could you forgot this?

Also:




Back on topic...

Those tanks were Anti air. It wont work in wot because they would be able too shut the underbelly of the enemy tanks.

UberJager #9 Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:56 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 25678 battles
  • 4,468
  • [RDR] RDR
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010

View Postsuru94, on 04 February 2013 - 04:48 PM, said:

Why not? The tank from first pic could be tier XI  :Smile-playing:
I don't think it's bad idea about it (something new in game), but one problem - why E-100 is tier IX? It will have the same armor as his realistic version?
Second pic - Dear Santa...

Becouse all model Turret armor very very weak, Maybe max 100 mm .

Crux_T34 #10 Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8396 battles
  • 388
  • [NYA] NYA
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
You dissapoint me...no "actual" flak panzers shown.

Why has no-one mentioned the wirbelwind? 4 guns of beauty. (Probs a low tier due to lower calibre, high RoF guns).

MTWEmperor #11 Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:16 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16103 battles
  • 1,434
  • Member since:
    09-14-2012
bth Iono if the pen is enough on some of these.  They'd have to be heavily armored to make up for it.  Kinda like a BP or something I suppose.  Although that'd make them arty magnets, which the Germans already have enough of.  :Smile_sceptic:

Banelord300 #12 Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:30 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16501 battles
  • 2,116
  • [XCELL] XCELL
  • Member since:
    03-01-2011

View PostCrux_T34, on 04 February 2013 - 05:04 PM, said:

You dissapoint me...no "actual" flak panzers shown.

Why has no-one mentioned the wirbelwind? 4 guns of beauty. (Probs a low tier due to lower calibre, high RoF guns).
Have fun using 20mm cannons  :Smile_sceptic:

Banelord300 #13 Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:31 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16501 battles
  • 2,116
  • [XCELL] XCELL
  • Member since:
    03-01-2011


Soviet power :Smile-izmena:

Kellomies #14 Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:42 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15013 battles
  • 4,774
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
If you can't take the other tank out with *one* gun of given specs, more of them aren't particularly going to help you know. You're much better off swapping the things for a single more powerful gun which in all likelihood will weigh less and take up less space anyway. (Random side note: basic arithmetics off the in-game numbers say a pair of 10,5cm L/68 guns would weigh about the same as the JgdE's 17cm gun, which is presumably in a superstructure for a *reason* - feasibility issues much? Mutatis mutandis same issue with trying to shove a pair of long 88's into the E-75...)
This isn't Battletech with its odd ablative-armor system.

Basically, AA work (especially the kind where multi-gun mountings are genuinely useful) has rather different needs from antitank duties and trying to use the former for the latter is dubious at best unless the target is something light indeed.

suru94 #15 Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18196 battles
  • 28
  • [D-CD] D-CD
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011
Oh, you are right. These heavy tanks will be able to destroy only meds eventually. Yeah, something is wrong.

Ascender #16 Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:04 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 19186 battles
  • 2,700
  • Member since:
    12-03-2010
No flakpanzers in WoT, WG stated it sad but true. Not going to happen, now let's just move along and let this topic decay into a squishy pile of mud....

orejaempezar #17 Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10338 battles
  • 491
  • Member since:
    03-12-2011
Have you seen Pirates of the Caribbean? I want a three barreled gatling gun. The three barrels are the long 128 of the JT.

No, wait, i want DOUBLE three barreled gatling guns in each turret ( in a 5 turret tank, ofc )

still_guns #18 Posted 05 February 2013 - 06:46 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4700 battles
  • 373
  • [KMMHS] KMMHS
  • Member since:
    03-20-2011
FLAK tanks have no place in WoT. World of Warplanes, well, yes as 'defence' for bases. In WoT no. They shoot shrapnel shells, not anti-tank. And I don't care if they did it with the Pom-Pom, you just can't!

Kellomies #19 Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:24 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15013 battles
  • 4,774
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
To be fair most of the large-caliber high-velocity guns were originally heavy AA pieces. No point in reinventing the wheel since most militaries could rather straighforwardly repurpose them into antitank and tank main-gun roles.

Cannot for the life of me comprehend what would be the point in wasting heavy tank hulls as platforms for heavy AA batteries though - those guns are well-nigh useless against ground-attack aircraft coming in fast and low (you use rapid-tracking, rapid-firing autocannon against those), their bailiwick is engaging high-flying level bombers which AFAIK were never a major concern for armoured formations. Maybe they could've served as escorts for something like the Ratte or Monster or those big railroad guns against the unwelcome attentions of elite RAF squadrons carrying Tallboys or somesuch, but can't really see how a heavy half-track or similar (onto which 88's were mounted on a limited basis already in '40 for bunker-busting purposes) wouldn't be a lot more economical carrier solution...

UberJager #20 Posted 06 February 2013 - 03:34 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 25678 battles
  • 4,468
  • [RDR] RDR
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010
Main target  : French Heavy , All Mediums, All Light tanks. and other weak armor tank.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users