Jump to content


A video for newcomers and newbies


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
85 replies to this topic

Kvaak #41 Posted 31 May 2013 - 09:48 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 13483 battles
  • 2,052
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010
Did you know that if you flip a coin a hundred times there's a 55% chance you'll get at least 6 tails or 6 heads in a row?

Sometimes you get all the bad players in your team, sometimes you get all the good players in your team. The fact that sometimes they're unevenly distributed in itself proves that the MM is random.

Quote

players who have just acquired a new higher tier vehicle are encouraged by being placed into battle sessions near the lower boundary of that vehicle's accessibility range, which allows the player feel more comfortable in the game. With time, the balancing system starts putting them into higher levels battle sessions, which creates a challenge of playing with more upgraded opponent vehicles. Details regarding how this aspect is performed are provided below, based on the use of the variable Nin table 801.
Do you even know what this means? It refers to the vehicle's battle tier, i.e. the fact that when you purchase the vehicle it'll have limited MM so you end up as top tier more often (so your stock condition is less painful). After a certain period of time you'll start to have varying MM weights so you'll end up as bottom, middle and top tier evenly.

There is no reference to player performance, the performance of your team, the performance of the enemy team whatsoever. All it is referring to is the battle tiers you're encountering and even then it's just a special case of driving a newly acquired tank. There is no reference to player performancehere.

Thanks for the video though, it definitely gave me a good laugh. I bet you wear a tinfoil hat over your tinfoil hat. Just in case your tinfoil hat is also a part of the great conspiracy.

Edited by Kvaak, 31 May 2013 - 09:51 PM.


2alertred #42 Posted 31 May 2013 - 09:52 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17759 battles
  • 2,040
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View PostShnuks, on 31 May 2013 - 09:42 PM, said:

I love the fact he's changing his voice. Like WG elite ninja assassins are out to get him and he needs to hide his identity.

Yes yes Kbg is behind me. Nah just kiding. Recording voice for 14 min is hell. (some my very old videos have my real voice).

zaphod_4242 #43 Posted 31 May 2013 - 09:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13523 battles
  • 731
  • [GLRYB] GLRYB
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 09:24 PM, said:

From E-100 tread:

If that is not a challenge then i dont know what it is.

It definitely is no proof for your theory. It would be, if you had a couple of thousands of those screenshots consistently correlating with your WR. Let me guess: you don't.

2alertred #44 Posted 31 May 2013 - 09:58 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17759 battles
  • 2,040
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View Postzaphod_4242, on 31 May 2013 - 09:53 PM, said:

It definitely is no proof for your theory. It would be, if you had a couple of thousands of those screenshots consistently correlating with your WR. Let me guess: you don't.

Thats not hard to do. Make a new accaunt. Play 100 games with this addon instaled. Dont pay any gold and screenshot every game.
Make a table.
Then compare.

(of cose i am too lazy to do that  :trollface: )

Spiegel_san #45 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17192 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 09:58 PM, said:

Thats not hard to do. Make a new accaunt. Play 100 games with this addon instaled. Dont pay any gold and screenshot every game.
Make a table.
Then compare.

(of cose i am too lazy to do that  :trollface: )

Already did that, and I had 59 win ratio and 1600 wn6, so your argument is invalid.  and that wasn't in 100 battles but in 600. More accurate therefore.

Edited by gudzhis, 31 May 2013 - 10:05 PM.


The_Challenger #46 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Military Specialist
  • 5509 battles
  • 1,987
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    01-19-2012

View Postisard, on 30 May 2013 - 11:03 AM, said:


PS: Do I have to add that i quit WoT?

But made six forum posts in two days ? Sorry I don't understand :unsure:

zaphod_4242 #47 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13523 battles
  • 731
  • [GLRYB] GLRYB
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 09:58 PM, said:

Play 100 games with this addon instaled.

This shows your lack of understanding of basic statistics. I'd have to take at least 1000, better 10000 screenshots.

2alertred #48 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:05 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17759 battles
  • 2,040
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View Postzaphod_4242, on 31 May 2013 - 10:03 PM, said:

This shows your lack of understanding of basic statistics. I'd have to take at least 1000, better 10000 screenshots.

Yeah and 100 random players. Its realy hard too prove but the dice exists.

Now thats a good youtube comment:
everything you said in this video is correct, WoT becomes skill-less game where you have not control over your actions except choosing camping spot or driving route, everything else is decided by some stupid script. so you have it 0 damage hits, mercy shots which happens always on low HP (1%) and so on. if you look at the perks, some of them can be utilized only via script like "Intuition" for example, man my loader suddenly changed type of the shell (gold shell I guess :D) he is a smart dude :D

Edited by 2alertred, 31 May 2013 - 10:07 PM.


Naeron66 #49 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:08 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Veteran
  • 8520 battles
  • 1,924
  • Member since:
    11-12-2010

View Post2alertred, on 26 May 2013 - 07:48 AM, said:

Because new people need too know what they are paying for. Every company hides the things. And once you reveal the things its panic.

BS, this is the typical conspiracy theory crap we hear all the time, things that are refuted by the evidence.

You linked the patent, which does not mention any of the "rigging" you then go on to pretend is in the game.

Spiegel_san #50 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:09 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17192 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 10:05 PM, said:

Yeah and 100 random players. Its realy hard too prove but the dice exists.

Did you unblock me from youtube?? I wanna discuss it there too. please  :smile:

Shnuks #51 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:12 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 40448 battles
  • 4,990
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    06-16-2012
Of course. It's a well known fact that WG is a puppet of the Bilderberg Group who's main plan is to control everything. And they are doing this through WOT. How? By making you accept it. You all know you are only playing out a script. A script WG wants you to play out. You may think you are in control, but you aren't! It's all a lie!!!!!

WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Edited by Shnuks, 31 May 2013 - 10:12 PM.


Naeron66 #52 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Veteran
  • 8520 battles
  • 1,924
  • Member since:
    11-12-2010

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 09:11 PM, said:

In addition to providing balanced battle sessions, the use of tier-limited battle levels provides the ability to control difficulty levels of the battle so that players of all skill levels remain challenged and wanting to play more. Players with higher tier vehicles have no access to lower battle levels, likewise lower tier vehicles are not allowed into higher battle levels. However, with one and the same vehicle players can happen to get into battle sessions of different levels within their accessibility range. By putting players into battles of varying level, the players experience a variety of game play while experiencing both wins and losses. According to one aspect, a player may be placed randomly or sequentially in any suitable battle level. However, according to another aspect, players who have just acquired a new higher tier vehicle are encouraged by being placed into battle sessions near the lower boundary of that vehicle's accessibility range, which allows the player feel more comfortable in the game. With time, the balancing system starts putting them into higher levels battle sessions, which creates a challenge of playing with more upgraded opponent vehicles. Details regarding how this aspect is performed are provided below, based on the use of the variable Nin table 801.

Using battle levels as described herein, matchmaking servers can assign players to sessions to provide players with varied gaming experiences without frustrating or boring the player. Battle sessions are balanced while the difficulty levels of the battle session for each player are controlled.

What does this tell you? Challange for them is puting you into a 30% win ratio teams.

No that this not what it says.

What it says is that the MM puts you into battles with tanks of other tiers, sometimes you are top tier and sometimes you are bottom tier. As is shows in Table 801 (which is the battle tier table). That is what results in: "By putting players into battles of varying level, the players experience a variety of game play while experiencing both wins and losses"

Then it says that when your first buy a tank it makes the battles slightly easier for the first few battles by not putting you against the highest possible tiers you would meet normally.

Absolutely NOTHING in the patent even mentions controlling which tanks end up in your team according to their overall win rate.

Spiegel_san #53 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:29 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17192 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
  http://clip2net.com/s/59Ghct


translation.

Video clip owner or moderator blocked you. :(

LordofDiscord #54 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:34 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 101078 battles
  • 324
  • [W_A] W_A
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011
Forum warrior

Edited by LordofDiscord, 31 May 2013 - 10:37 PM.


2alertred #55 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:35 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17759 battles
  • 2,040
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View PostNaeron66, on 31 May 2013 - 10:17 PM, said:

No that this not what it says.

What it says is that the MM puts you into battles with tanks of other tiers, sometimes you are top tier and sometimes you are bottom tier. As is shows in Table 801 (which is the battle tier table). That is what results in: "By putting players into battles of varying level, the players experience a variety of game play while experiencing both wins and losses"

Then it says that when your first buy a tank it makes the battles slightly easier for the first few battles by not putting you against the highest possible tiers you would meet normally.

Absolutely NOTHING in the patent even mentions controlling which tanks end up in your team according to their overall win rate.

You think they will add this in patent?
Something like:
Every player who reaches 55% win ratio will face teams with 52% win ratio avrege and his team will be made out of 46% win ratio players on avrege.
They are not so stupid. Those things are pretty much locked here:

Posted Image

Company hides the secrets:
http://news.discover...rets-110216.htm

Kvaak #56 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:39 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 13483 battles
  • 2,052
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 10:35 PM, said:

Every player who reaches 55% win ratio will face teams with 52% win ratio avrege and his team will be made out of 46% win ratio players on avrege.
Well, judging from the sheer number of people with over 55% WR I'd say sticking them with 45% WR players quite clearly isn't enough. Or maybe it just isn't happening :o)

Edited by Kvaak, 31 May 2013 - 10:58 PM.


Spiegel_san #57 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:39 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17192 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Post2alertred, on 31 May 2013 - 10:35 PM, said:

You think they will add this in patent?
Something like:
Every player who reaches 55% win ratio will face teams with 52% win ratio avrege and his team will be made out of 46% win ratio players on avrege.
They are not so stupid. Those things are pretty much locked here:

Posted Image

Company hides the secrets:
http://news.discover...rets-110216.htm

I don't see anything like that in picture.  :unsure:

you mean they have white room where is placed safe?

Edited by gudzhis, 31 May 2013 - 10:41 PM.


2alertred #58 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:42 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17759 battles
  • 2,040
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011

View PostKvaak, on 31 May 2013 - 10:39 PM, said:

Well, judging from the sheer number of people with over 55% WR I'd say sticking them with 45% WR players quite clearly isn't enough. Or maybe it just isn't happening :o)

Well some players are just bad by nature.  :teethhappy:

_reDWings_ #59 Posted 31 May 2013 - 11:33 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 31755 battles
  • 182
  • [ACE-] ACE-
  • Member since:
    07-18-2012

View PostEexhaton, on 26 May 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:

It absolutely looks like it was made by a 14 year old with a bad grudge against WG from some shady Siemacountry.
Not much worthy of starting a revolution..
Think about it. (not abauth it)  :smile:  
/2cents

I think he is from Sweden... Telia is a Swedish internet provider, right? But who knows.... Anyway, he has some good points, but some fishy conspiratorial theories too. But still, we live in a free society, and people can have their own opinion...

Cheers!

Spiegel_san #60 Posted 31 May 2013 - 11:37 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17192 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Post_reDWings_, on 31 May 2013 - 11:33 PM, said:

I think he is from Sweden... Telia is a Swedish internet provider, right? But who knows.... Anyway, he has some good points, but some fishy conspiratorial theories too. But still, we live in a free society, and people can have their own opinion...

Cheers!

And we can question them or deny them.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users