Jump to content


flamethrower tanks


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
5 replies to this topic

keith9111 #1 Posted 30 May 2013 - 08:55 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21201 battles
  • 10
  • [SOAF] SOAF
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
should wargaming introduce flamethrower tanks such as the Churchill crocodile tank and other such tanks
http://upload.wikime...rocodile_01.jpg

MarshallDTeach #2 Posted 30 May 2013 - 08:58 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 26550 battles
  • 2,109
  • [WSET] WSET
  • Member since:
    11-06-2011
Hetzer have a flamethrower version,

BUT why you want it ingame? do you burn enemy tanks in 500m?

Flamethrower efficence is >100m

Jonei #3 Posted 31 May 2013 - 05:08 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17041 battles
  • 75
  • Member since:
    04-27-2012
Could be fun... imagine 15v15 flamethrower tanks.
Or just burn down a forest that everyone is camping in :P

OmaiGodman #4 Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:30 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7561 battles
  • 428
  • [KIWF] KIWF
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
Other than burning down bushes I see no use for these tanks in WoT. They were used against infantry/bunkers, not against other tanks.

basin79 #5 Posted 01 June 2013 - 10:48 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 15351 battles
  • 8,727
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012
There's already a flame thrower tank. The KV1-S. Shoot it anywhere near the back and hey presto. A flame thrower tank.

Dragon117 #6 Posted 01 June 2013 - 11:59 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3681 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011
Tanks only armed with a flame thrower are not practical in this game. However, there is a version of the T-34 that has the machine gun in the UFP replaced with a flame thrower. THAT, I would love to have in game, because you can burn stuff and still have a main gun.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users