Jump to content


New Clan Wars Campaign – Second Stage Revealed


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
40 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 26,823
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
We’re bringing you all the hot news and all the important information regarding the upcoming second stage of the ongoing Clan Wars Campaign. Be the first to know!

Read the full text here

teemu92 #2 Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:22 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 5410 battles
  • 1,222
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011
What is that?

Anyway cw looks really nice now, good luck to all!

MB7 #3 Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 68722 battles
  • 17
  • [S-TEM] S-TEM
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011
drugi

King_Cobra_357 #4 Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18435 battles
  • 227
  • [_NOC_] _NOC_
  • Member since:
    03-11-2012
It is going to be hell in Africa...

Tuccy #5 Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:39 PM

    Czech Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 14457 battles
  • 6,482
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    10-24-2010
And whether you are a seasoned clan Wars player or a newcomer to this arena, feel free to give us feedback on the CW guide, please  :smile:

Gnomus #6 Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:52 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 34486 battles
  • 2,029
  • [ASEET] ASEET
  • Member since:
    02-12-2011
One quite important question:
Are VP counted on actual gold income or nominal gold income? So do you get 3x VP if you ransack an area but get 0 VP if you hold area that is ransacked earlier?

Then little note:
If African provinces increases first half of phase and decreases on second they will produce more than if they would keep their nominal value. In Med and Europe provinces first go down and then up, so they will produce less than their nominal value. This might be ok because African provinces are poorer than others, but this means that African Key provinces will be monsters. Or are key provinces going away after phase one?

And another question on dynamic income: How are areas handled which belong to both Med and African map?

bathory666 #7 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:19 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 22864 battles
  • 24
  • [SLF] SLF
  • Member since:
    09-07-2010
Maybe I'm overly paranoic, but is it just conicidence or not that the strongest alliance chose West African territories as their main objecive.....

H311fi5h #8 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 41405 battles
  • 1,053
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012
The Kazna-EXNOM-PTS-EFE etc. corner of the map is just easy to hold since there are no landing zones to backstab you. So it's a logical choice. Other clans attempted to land there as well but withdrew when they saw the big alliance.

nepobedivi #9 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 38785 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    03-07-2011
this don't change anything only clan (with premium acc members a large num...) can do something in this stupid campaign. they can buy tanks tier 7-8 we other don't have time and money to buy them. Why did you now introduce riot and not in start of first stage. Now one clan can hold up to 100 province in theory ofc. But many clan have 10-20 province this is [edited]. not participate in this cw campaign  anymore, waiting for tier 10 :PPPPPPPP

sry for bad english  :smile:

Edited by NightmareMachine, 18 June 2013 - 04:29 AM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. NightmareMachine


Ebayers #10 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:40 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7892 battles
  • 182
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011
Great.....the map is even more dominated by the top clans now. But unlike the old clanwars they now get awesome rewards. Why oh why done you implement even a 3 tiered league to clanwars, would introduce more competition!!!!!

Part of my point is that, I am a fairly average player, and I have two tier 10 tanks. I am in a clan of similar and better skill. We have to compete against clans who are much better and personally I am unlikely to suddenly become awesome with 60% win...........

At the moment if your an average player you get your tier 10 tank and initially its quite cool, but then there is no end game content for us. If your a top player its great, loads of tournaments etc. But most of the player base are not by definition in the top % of players and so for us the game stagnates abit. Random battles get a bit dull after 4k of the buggers.

Edited by Ebayers, 17 June 2013 - 01:47 PM.


bathory666 #11 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:43 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 22864 battles
  • 24
  • [SLF] SLF
  • Member since:
    09-07-2010

View PostH311fi5h, on 17 June 2013 - 01:38 PM, said:

The Kazna-EXNOM-PTS-EFE etc. corner of the map is just easy to hold since there are no landing zones to backstab you. So it's a logical choice. Other clans attempted to land there as well but withdrew when they saw the big alliance.

Logical choice knowing that income will be increased, helps as well.... It's ok that a lot of small territories yield a low income, but knowing that the income will increase.... 1SBP also went to Africa....

llVIU #12 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 37987 battles
  • 964
  • [TKSPG] TKSPG
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012
who suggested to wg this low tier thing? certainly not any of my clans, you already get a mil usd a day, why can't you just put 2 cw servers? one with tier limit and one without tier limit? oh that's right, because that would be a good idea.

whatever wg decides, we, the customer, must abide no matter what, because the customer is always wrong... well it's not like we pay real money to this game oh wait yes we do

well "whacha gonna do about it?" well I'm most likely just gonna get banned for this post, I pay them and I get banned, isn't that sweet?

I can hardly wait for 1 week of 6 batchat spg per each side, just camp for 14 minutes, then 1 minute of spg hell, then draw... world of spg not world of tanks, the trailers for this game are a complete lie

Edited by llVIU, 17 June 2013 - 01:53 PM.


MTWEmperor #13 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:50 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18624 battles
  • 1,252
  • Member since:
    09-14-2012
I don't understand why people are complaining about top clans being on top.....This is about who's the best and if you have incredibly good members what's to stop you from getting the prizes?  I for one think it was a good move on WG's part to allow other clans to participate in CW and get a taste of it.  This Campaign mixes it up and allows almost anyone to participate.

Edit: It seems like people want the M60 given out like participation ribbons......

Edited by MTWEmperor, 17 June 2013 - 05:50 PM.


llVIU #14 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 37987 battles
  • 964
  • [TKSPG] TKSPG
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012
MTWEmperor because fairness is when everyone has an equal chance to get the reward - like getting a tier 10 vehicle, some just take a shorter route (good players

however in clans wars, ONLY a few few players of elite clans get the M60 and NOBODY else has even the slightest chance of getting the tank, you call that fair? that's like putting a 6 year old with a scientist from nasa, in a math test... yeah sooo fair, the nasa scientist will ace the test each and every single time

Ebayers #15 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:57 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7892 battles
  • 182
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

View PostMTWEmperor, on 17 June 2013 - 01:50 PM, said:

I don't understand why people are complaining about top clans being on top.....This is about who's the best and if you have incredibly good members what's to stop you from getting the prizes?  I for one think it was a good move on WG's part to allow other clans to participate in CW and get a taste of it.  This Campaign mixes it up and allows almost anyone to participate.

We are not saying that having content for the best players is a good thing. But some end game for your average joe player is what most of the community are crying out for.

Cobra6 #16 Posted 17 June 2013 - 01:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16343 battles
  • 15,988
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010
Maybe link to the english article in the English section instead of a foreign language?

Cobra 6

H311fi5h #17 Posted 17 June 2013 - 02:03 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 41405 battles
  • 1,053
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012
WG did a lot of specials and tournaments that allowed smaller teams and solo-players to win gold and premium tanks (Type 59 and 62 currently) and they will continue doing so. I grant you, the M60 is very special in the way that it's a unique tier 10, but you need a butload of skill, effort and organization to get it. I think this kind of exertion is worth rewarding don't you?

Arclayd #18 Posted 17 June 2013 - 02:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 19505 battles
  • 898
  • Member since:
    07-22-2010

View PostllVIU, on 17 June 2013 - 01:56 PM, said:

MTWEmperor because fairness is when everyone has an equal chance to get the reward - like getting a tier 10 vehicle, some just take a shorter route (good players

however in clans wars, ONLY a few few players of elite clans get the M60 and NOBODY else has even the slightest chance of getting the tank, you call that fair? that's like putting a 6 year old with a scientist from nasa, in a math test... yeah sooo fair, the nasa scientist will ace the test each and every single time

You are completely wrong and your parallel with grinding T10 tanks is total nonsense.


Its not about the time and equal chances. If you want M60, you need to be among the best, be in clan and that clan needs to be in an alliance.


All this require a lot of time spent playing the game and organising people/clans and spending your gold (or gold earned from CW/competitions, which equals again time spent playing game).


View PostllVIU, on 17 June 2013 - 01:56 PM, said:

fairness is when everyone has an equal chance to get the reward

You have an equal chance to grind your T10, to be good at it, to enter a clan which is focusing on CWs and earn that M60.



Its similar like I would be crying that its unfair that players in winning teams in DreamHack earned thousands of € and I would like to earn that money as well.

Im far from being that good as the players playing in Proleague and I spent far less time practising, but I will whine again and again and again that its not fair that only them have the chance to earn the prizes.


But I am not that good and I dont spent that much time playing the game. I know that, its nothing wrong about that.

So I keep my mouth shut up and I am not whining about that on forums.

(hint hint)

Edited by Arclayd, 17 June 2013 - 02:10 PM.


Arafel #19 Posted 17 June 2013 - 02:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46325 battles
  • 596
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    07-31-2011

View PostllVIU, on 17 June 2013 - 01:56 PM, said:

MTWEmperor because fairness is when everyone has an equal chance to get the reward - like getting a tier 10 vehicle, some just take a shorter route (good players

however in clans wars, ONLY a few few players of elite clans get the M60 and NOBODY else has even the slightest chance of getting the tank, you call that fair? that's like putting a 6 year old with a scientist from nasa, in a math test... yeah sooo fair, the nasa scientist will ace the test each and every single time

Everybody has the same chance, the rules are the same for every clan, how can you call that unfair?
What you seem to want is a lottery, just sign up for the campaign and hope you get lucky, what is the point of that, if you don't even have to play to win the tank...

Tuccy #20 Posted 17 June 2013 - 02:46 PM

    Czech Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 14457 battles
  • 6,482
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    10-24-2010

View PostCobra6, on 17 June 2013 - 01:59 PM, said:

Maybe link to the english article in the English section instead of a foreign language?

Cobra 6

Fixed, sorry, looks like our tools are a bit confused today.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users