Jump to content


i have no words for this


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
21 replies to this topic

killer11110 #1 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21587 battles
  • 465
  • [FANG] FANG
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012
i dont have comments for this he did nothing in the battle while i did 4 kills 4000 dmg and defended a whole side i checked his stats and this

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_033.jpg   120.34K


Arkhell #2 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010
how can you have a win rating of less then 50% in a SU-122-44... that's just impossibru.

killer11110 #3 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:17 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21587 battles
  • 465
  • [FANG] FANG
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012
well it is possible if you have 1524 battles and also you dont have anything else than premiums

Edited by killer11110, 10 July 2013 - 12:17 PM.


Arkhell #4 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:18 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010

View Postkiller11110, on 10 July 2013 - 12:17 PM, said:

well it is possible if you have 1524 battles and also you dont have anything else than premiums

but that thing shoots every 6 seconds for 390 dmg, you just can't fail in that on tier 7..... it's just..... whut?

aGentleTanker #5 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:19 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 21043 battles
  • 3,476
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
so ?

is it forbidden to be bad and spend a lot of money?

killer11110 #6 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21587 battles
  • 465
  • [FANG] FANG
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012
its not forbidden but it just ruins the fun out of the game there need to be restrictions like to buy tir 8 premiums after 3000 battles or things like that

Black_Gold_Saw #7 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:23 PM

    Goliath Slayer

  • Player
  • 19024 battles
  • 692
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011

View PostArkhell, on 10 July 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:

how can you have a win rating of less then 50% in a SU-122-44... that's just impossibru.

View PostArkhell, on 10 July 2013 - 12:18 PM, said:

but that thing shoots every 6 seconds for 390 dmg, you just can't fail in that on tier 7..... it's just..... whut?

Sweet jesus my exact words

Eight_Ball #8 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:25 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Commander
  • 36758 battles
  • 2,484
  • [AVOS] AVOS
  • Member since:
    09-07-2011
39% in the 8.8 premium......

Lindling #9 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15359 battles
  • 636
  • [-SAS-] -SAS-
  • Member since:
    04-05-2012
^^ I also have <50% SU-122-44 winrate ... that one is so fun to drive that you constantly get in trouble ...

want to see horror?
        

Attached Files

  • Attached File   horror.jpg   2.57K


trba91 #10 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14053 battles
  • 173
  • [T-72] T-72
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View PostArkhell, on 10 July 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:

how can you have a win rating of less then 50% in a SU-122-44... that's just impossibru.

Yeah... i myself am not exactly a great player but that thing rocks everything in tier VII, you just can't fail with that thing  :eyesup:

Arkhell #11 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:37 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010

View PostLindling, on 10 July 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:

^^ I also have <50% SU-122-44 winrate ... that one is so fun to drive that you constantly get in trouble ...

want to see horror?
Attachmenthorror.jpg

37.5% vic rating... working against it's own team or something? even a bot manages about 43%  :trollface:

Edited by Arkhell, 10 July 2013 - 12:58 PM.


Lindling #12 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15359 battles
  • 636
  • [-SAS-] -SAS-
  • Member since:
    04-05-2012

View PostArkhell, on 10 July 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:

37.5% vic rating... working against your own team or something? even a bot manages about 43% :trollface:

thats not me, just some random teammate i had sometime ago
here, see:
Posted Image

Arkhell #13 Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:51 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010
figured as much couldn't be arsed to edit the post though after i clicked post

edit:

looked at teh picture.... 295 dmg a battle... thats 1 shot and 1K exp max exp.. dehell does that guy do drive it backwards? no wait that would atleast give you spotting exp...

i can't even
Posted Image

Edited by Arkhell, 10 July 2013 - 12:55 PM.


Unch_04 #14 Posted 19 July 2013 - 02:14 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59082 battles
  • 272
  • [FE2O3] FE2O3
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011
statistic [edited]

u all make me sick= didn't notice that this is a game/ -for fun >you know/
not a alltime camping championship/

f/u effi [edited]

Edited by BigBadVuk, 19 July 2013 - 03:39 PM.
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. BigBadVuk


skileskale #15 Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29185 battles
  • 94
  • [HSOP] HSOP
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View PostLindling, on 10 July 2013 - 12:42 PM, said:

thats not me, just some random teammate i had sometime ago
here, see:
Posted Image
What did i just see  :amazed:   cannot comprehend... brains hurting...

Arkhell #16 Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:32 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010

View PostUnch_04, on 19 July 2013 - 02:14 PM, said:

statistic asslickers

u all make me sick= didn't notice that this is a game/ -for fun >you know/
not a alltime camping championship/

f/u effi noobssuckers

Winning is fun, loosing is not fun.
doing damage is fun, not doing damage is not fun.
beeing good is fun, failing at everything you do is not fun.

starting to see a trent yet?

Unch_04 #17 Posted 19 July 2013 - 04:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59082 battles
  • 272
  • [FE2O3] FE2O3
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011
playing is fun/

winning and lossing are part of the game...

> and if only dmg is fun = then let's erase all mediums and light tanks/
let's play arty! =it has to be fun!

arkhell man, try living a bit... there is life beyond the bush

Arkhell #18 Posted 19 July 2013 - 05:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010

View PostUnch_04, on 19 July 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:

playing is fun/

winning and lossing are part of the game...

> and if only dmg is fun = then let's erase all mediums and light tanks/
let's play arty! =it has to be fun!

arkhell man, try living a bit... there is life beyond the bush

actually i have played less WoT in a longer time span then you so i would say i spent less time on the game then you do.

dono about you but i do more dmg in my medium tanks then the average arty does. playing is fun, loosing is not fun. whats the point in playing a game you are no good at, it only frustrates.

Unch_04 #19 Posted 20 July 2013 - 09:33 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59082 battles
  • 272
  • [FE2O3] FE2O3
  • Member since:
    08-23-2011
that would leave us with only one player... the best one that is winning = and others uninstalled..

Edited by Unch_04, 20 July 2013 - 09:34 PM.


Arkhell #20 Posted 21 July 2013 - 08:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010

View PostUnch_04, on 20 July 2013 - 09:33 PM, said:

that would leave us with only one player... the best one that is winning = and others uninstalled..

no that would leave us with a player base that would be getting better and better making for bleedingly exciting matches for everyone without lemming trains, tier 10 players with 0 dmg etc etc




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users