Jump to content


Version 8.7 to be released on Wednesday July 24th


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
384 replies to this topic

BlackDragon1032 #61 Posted 23 July 2013 - 07:26 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4275 battles
  • 135
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostSwen_rudobrody, on 23 July 2013 - 04:22 PM, said:

"
Switched off the Assault mode on the Westfield and Malinovka maps.
Added changes to the Assault mode on the map Malinovka
"

Can someone explain what these two a bit contradictory statements mean?
I was wondering the same thing

roofer #62 Posted 23 July 2013 - 07:30 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 89041 battles
  • 179
  • [T-S_K] T-S_K
  • Member since:
    06-11-2011
Until Arty is rebalanced, I definately will not be researching the British line anytime soon.

BlackDragon1032 #63 Posted 23 July 2013 - 07:30 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4275 battles
  • 135
  • Member since:
    05-23-2013

View PostDexter5021, on 23 July 2013 - 07:26 PM, said:

Posted Image
Yep

DiabloPT #64 Posted 23 July 2013 - 07:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23683 battles
  • 85
  • Member since:
    08-15-2012
fail fail and fail
you cant put -1

Horcan #65 Posted 23 July 2013 - 07:44 PM

    The Great Hunter

  • Player
  • 62204 battles
  • 520
  • [DACUS] DACUS
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Westfield assault mode is even worse than before, when the defending side was on the other side.Defending side loses most of the time "rape mode " with ridiculous scores like 15-4.I guess thats why they removed it again. If they really want to keep assault mode for it , i suggest to leave the starting positions as they are for standard mode and force one team to attack by removing thier cap zone and turning the assault mode on. The current position for spawn points give way too much advantage for the attacker , because of the hull down positions that allow to safely spot the entire village plateau, where every tank caught not behind a house will quicky be raped by the snipers in the other team, that are also safely far out of spot range, in a too dense forest.

Edited by Horcan, 23 July 2013 - 07:51 PM.


EpicTW #66 Posted 23 July 2013 - 07:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33910 battles
  • 47
  • [BREAD] BREAD
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012
Why are emblems and inscriptions on the T-50-2 sold for their purchase price and not the camouflage patterns? I put gold camouflage on my T-50-2 and i don't necessarily want it on the MT-25. Surely refunding the camouflage for the purchase price is what should be done.

100% radio man rather than a radioman with as much experience as your least experienced T-50-2 crewman also seems illogical.

Please let common sense prevail and address these two issues as soon as possible.

Xxx_HuisBaasBob_xxX #67 Posted 23 July 2013 - 08:04 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 19703 battles
  • 124
  • Member since:
    01-03-2011
Can somebody please give me more information about the sell for gold superpershing thing? When is it going to happen? the last thing i heard was that it is supposed to happen in 8.7.

huntingdog #68 Posted 23 July 2013 - 08:26 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 14541 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
So lets see if I got it right... they will take your T-50-2 crew and put it on the MT-25 and to that crew they will add a radioman which will be trained to 100%...  :facepalm: The radioman should have gotten a training level equal to the other crew members! What are you doing?

JimLahey #69 Posted 23 July 2013 - 08:33 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 29389 battles
  • 961
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

View PostEpicTW, on 23 July 2013 - 07:53 PM, said:

Please let common sense prevail and address these two issues as soon as possible.

1) Common sense does not apply here ($WG€).
2) If you seriously think they listen... well, can't help you there sir.  :smile:

Morden_279 #70 Posted 23 July 2013 - 08:43 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14270 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    01-13-2012
I've hardly played my S-51 since the arty nerf. I spend 3/4 of the game waiting to reload and lay the gun, and even then I hardly hit anything. It's just not fun anymore. Consequently, I'll not be going down the British SPG line, or spending money on the Premium Sexton. If the nerf was removed in a subsequent patch, I'd reconsider this decision.

Edited by Morden_279, 23 July 2013 - 08:43 PM.


MasterAref #71 Posted 23 July 2013 - 08:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32188 battles
  • 118
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012
ah get back ELC turret to it's default in 8.5.
Why you change it whithout mention anything about it in Release Note?!!!

Chuffy #72 Posted 23 July 2013 - 09:24 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6978 battles
  • 631
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011
I want Swamp back in the random rotation.

I also want less frikkin' content patches to be replaced with fix patches.

The only good thing I can see about this patch is the E-25 SuperHetzer (and that is overpriced).

Thrael7 #73 Posted 23 July 2013 - 09:41 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24412 battles
  • 2,000
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-17-2012
The crew of T-50-2 will be automatically retrained for MT-25 and the XP on T-50 transfered in KV1S... They didnt bother about our crew of M7 Priest that needed to be retrained TWICE by us(!) to fit in M41 and a bunch of worthless thousands of XP stuck in M7 Priest when they could 've at least transfered them in M37.

I wonder what's gonna get ****ed up this time...

Edited by Thrael7, 23 July 2013 - 09:45 PM.


Zdenka70 #74 Posted 23 July 2013 - 10:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9058 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013

View PostThrael7, on 23 July 2013 - 09:41 PM, said:

The crew of T-50-2 will be automatically retrained for MT-25 and the XP on T-50 transfered in KV1S... They didnt bother about our crew of M7 Priest that needed to be retrained TWICE by us(!) to fit in M41 and a bunch of worthless thousands of XP stuck in M7 Priest when they could 've at least transfered them in M37.

I wonder what's gonna get ****ed up this time...
same here, with last patch i have 17 k XP on the M41 now, i had over 50 k, because you needed over 60k for next arty, before 8.6, wasted 17 k XP for nothing, gimme 680gold please, so i can convert the 17 k useless XP on my M41, thanks

MrBio_Marty #75 Posted 23 July 2013 - 10:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7489 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    05-06-2013
nice birthday present !!

Mochican #76 Posted 23 July 2013 - 10:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 441 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    07-30-2011
Just another useless update that does not contribute for the good of players T50-2 gone More new arty tree for who arty doesn't play that much anymore the only good thing that this patch offers is the map the new German TD is a real friggin joke How much more will WG screw this game up???

_black_soul #77 Posted 23 July 2013 - 11:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 55900 battles
  • 63
  • Member since:
    01-13-2012
YOU SWITCHED BIRCH GUN AND FV 304 WTF!!!! T4 AND 6 WAS PERFECT! WHY WE CAN'T EVEN TRY THIS NEW REBALANCE WITH TIER?IN TEST SERVER ARE STILL 4 AND 6 AND PATCH NOTES 3 AND 7,ffs LET US TEST THEM WAS THE ONLY COOL ARTY INTRODUCED!!!

baizondi #78 Posted 23 July 2013 - 11:34 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20645 battles
  • 347
  • Member since:
    04-06-2011
So, first why did WG release a whole new arty tree, when they ruined the arty experience ingame. And to add to it- they even release a new premium arty. What is more, WG decide to put a new german premium tier 7 td. How come? I just do not get it. There are now 3 premium german td`s and not a single American premium td. If someone from WG is reading this i got to ask him- are you all mentally sane and do you think for a second before you implement something in the game? I am not even starting to talk about the fact, that we have a chinese tree for quite a while now and we still do not have a premium chinese vehicle. But hey, "let us put a tier 7 premium td with a stug gun and a no good tier 3 premium arty". From my point of view this is just insane. For what is worth, i think that this is a rather useless update and WG should implement more of their time in adressing the real issues ingame, not how to add more and more stuff, that probably noone cares about.

Edited by baizondi, 23 July 2013 - 11:34 PM.


Dixxie_Normous #79 Posted 24 July 2013 - 12:05 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12014 battles
  • 167
  • [_BEER] _BEER
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013
Not happy that my XP I had built up on the T50 will be put on the KV-1S. Why should WG dictate what tank I should put my XP on?   Why not leave it on the T50 or put the XP into Free Experience so that I can use it on a tank I would rather have???

Xogens #80 Posted 24 July 2013 - 12:14 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 22552 battles
  • 71
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012
No need for update, wargaming.We dont play so much WOT!
You know why?

Edited by ElFlacoExplosivo, 24 July 2013 - 12:15 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users