Jump to content


World of Everything vs World of Tanks


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
28 replies to this topic

cont314 #1 Posted 14 August 2013 - 06:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29979 battles
  • 117
  • Member since:
    12-24-2010
Look at this video

Annnnnnd... Off-Topic
- Ectar

Edited by Ectar, 14 August 2013 - 08:50 PM.


killz0n #2 Posted 14 August 2013 - 06:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12126 battles
  • 67
  • [COFD] COFD
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011
...and? BF4 ... i pre-ordered, but i will still play WoT when they start fixing some tanks and stop ruining the game with useless patches...

g1Nebras #3 Posted 14 August 2013 - 06:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10852 battles
  • 386
  • Member since:
    10-04-2012
Posted Image

Uzkniso123 #4 Posted 14 August 2013 - 06:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14630 battles
  • 117
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011
Posted Image

martij30 #5 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:09 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12567 battles
  • 139
  • [KTE] KTE
  • Member since:
    03-31-2012
i won't give my money to that moneysucking EA company... my money deserves better. but onto the point: wait, there is none. you just posted a video.... so what? you can't compare a FPS with a tank game as WoT

Lil_Chewieezy #6 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:14 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30793 battles
  • 2,121
  • [3VS27] 3VS27
  • Member since:
    01-19-2012
The point is?
.
DICE makes Activision look good with the way they handle their games.
.
It was obvious long ago but DICE is by far the most incompetent development studio currently active in the gaming world, it goes way beyond the broken Bethesda games. The only thing I will buy from them after the disaster that BF 3 was is Mirror's Edge 2 when they bother to release it, won't be spending my money on a terribly boring and awkward FPS with good graphics, singleplayer component that makes you want format your PC to wash away any traces of it (yeah yeah yeah, online FPS blah blah blah, it has singleplayer for a reason and besides WoT and some MMOs I prefer the experience of singleplayer, it also has it for a reason and if, it has it it should at least be decent, not a disaster, they have much to learn from CoD with that) and most important of all, I will not spend money on a game that will work better in open beta than release and after a few patches it'd be in a state that would win it "most broken PoS of the year" awards. There isn't a single game developed by DICE in the alst several years that was not destroyed with every single patch they released, each patch fixes a few things and causes several times more game breaking bugs/glitches.
.
I find it absolutely outrageous to think that a straightup console game like BC 2 was more fun than what they made of the BF series with 3 and will continue to do with 4 by the looks of it.

Edited by Chewiezohrr, 14 August 2013 - 07:16 PM.


Wh1te #7 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:16 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14892 battles
  • 444
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011
I may will be a flame war starter....
But:
this gameplay is only seen in CW-s not anywhere... but i think its rare there too.
Ive played a lot of Bad Company 2 and a bit of BF3....
Whats in wot? Movement (and) tactics are present even if lemming train... maybe if we had 32 or 64 player battles there wont be lemming trains...
But as usual in tank you wont see (or very rarely) ppl runnin/driving on parts of map where they have nothing to do.... and if they gotten into battle
wont shoot histerically everything.
Wot has its own diseases i admit...
but these two game are hardly comparable. Wot is a great game and BF too.

Kdingo #8 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:17 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 31984 battles
  • 7,372
  • Member since:
    07-05-2011
Well, i enjoyed battlefield 2, i really enjoyed battlefield bad company 2, battlefield 3 was a kinda "maeh" experience didnt like it and i fear same will go for bf4. But i will most likely pass on bf4.

_TheMarkedOne_ #9 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:22 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20494 battles
  • 102
  • Member since:
    07-27-2011
Bad Company 2 was and even now is fun...but battlefield 3? Warfighter?...they should have focused only on multiplayer and never develop the singleplayer...

favorius #10 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30151 battles
  • 276
  • Member since:
    05-06-2011
Dat helicopter gunship needs a serious buff.

Naval Arty seems to be OP as hell nerf pls.

Brodan #11 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:28 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16315 battles
  • 415
  • Member since:
    07-02-2010
tank combat in WoT> tonks in BF3

nautalihas #12 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29070 battles
  • 267
  • [USAW] USAW
  • Member since:
    11-23-2011

View Postkillz0n, on 14 August 2013 - 06:41 PM, said:

...and? BF4 ... i pre-ordered, but i will still play WoT when they start fixing some tanks and stop ruining the game with useless patches...

Dont preorder games thats dumb.

killz0n #13 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:31 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12126 battles
  • 67
  • [COFD] COFD
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View Postnautalihas, on 14 August 2013 - 07:29 PM, said:

Dont preorder games thats dumb.
maybe...

CPTANT #14 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:34 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7515 battles
  • 259
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012
The battlefield series:

bf 1942: Great - pioneering game
bf desert combat: Great
bf vietnam: meh
bf 2 : very good
bf 2142: didn't play
bf bad company: lolconsoleslol
bf bad company 2: very good
bf 3: worst game in the series

SiCaRiO31 #15 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:37 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 8520 battles
  • 135
  • Member since:
    08-10-2010

View Postkillz0n, on 14 August 2013 - 07:31 PM, said:

maybe...

Edited by SiCaRiO31, 14 August 2013 - 07:38 PM.


MolochZ #16 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16263 battles
  • 1,007
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View Postmartij30, on 14 August 2013 - 07:09 PM, said:

i won't give my money to that moneysucking EA company... my money deserves better. but onto the point: wait, there is none. you just posted a video.... so what? you can't compare a FPS with a tank game as WoT

I don't understand why people always say "I won't give money to EA blah blah blah".

Fair enough you don't like EA but DICE make the game. They put all the work into it. EA take their cut obviously but DICE get most of the money from your purchase.

Personally I think DICE are an amazing company that make great games, they listen to their fans, have you ever read BF3 patch notes WG could learn a thing or two from them.

When I buy games I look at the studio that make the game not the publisher. At the end of the day the publisher is responsible for PR and marketing and have nothing to do with the programming and design process.

PrivateMonkeyz #17 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:44 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3974 battles
  • 359
  • Member since:
    02-16-2013

View PostCPTANT, on 14 August 2013 - 07:34 PM, said:

The battlefield series:

bf 1942: Great - pioneering game
bf desert combat: Great
bf vietnam: meh
bf 2 : very good
bf 2142: didn't play
bf bad company: lolconsoleslol
bf bad company 2: very good
bf 3: worst game in the series

bf 1942: Great
bf desert combat: Great
bf vietnam: -
bf 2 : Pretty nice
bf 2142: Much better than BF2
bf bad company: -
bf bad company 2: Better than BF2 and it gave a very realistic experience (voices, sounds , textures and great gameplay )
bf 3: Craaaap

tramazi #18 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:55 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 21776 battles
  • 440
  • [-TWP] -TWP
  • Member since:
    07-25-2010
Is BF free?
WoE 0 -v- 10 WoT

Edited by tramazi, 14 August 2013 - 07:56 PM.


Lord_WC #19 Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:59 PM

    Lieutenant –°olonel

  • Player
  • 18655 battles
  • 3,277
  • Member since:
    02-21-2011

View PostCPTANT, on 14 August 2013 - 07:34 PM, said:

bf 2142: didn't play
Pure awesome.
That's all.

Ipwnzyou #20 Posted 14 August 2013 - 08:00 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 50 battles
  • 356
  • Member since:
    06-02-2011

View Postmartij30, on 14 August 2013 - 07:09 PM, said:

i won't give my money to that moneysucking EA company... my money deserves better. but onto the point: wait, there is none. you just posted a video.... so what? you can't compare a FPS with a tank game as WoT

So you would rather give your money to a money sucking company like Wargaming? Both companies care little for their fanbase, so why support one over the other?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users