Jump to content


WTF WHAT a team!


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
14 replies to this topic

DirtyWar #1 Posted 18 September 2013 - 11:41 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32547 battles
  • 208
  • [TNAC] TNAC
  • Member since:
    10-04-2012
I dont do it a lot, but this one made me happy, so redicolus, that game was over after 2 minutes!
Posted Image
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
what do you think about this one, it was only 74%win chance, what happened there?
edit: you can see that the enemy team did less damage than one full HP tank! (like me)
edit2: murovanka map, south west base

Edited by DirtyWar, 18 September 2013 - 11:44 AM.


Panzerkeks85 #2 Posted 18 September 2013 - 11:48 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8878 battles
  • 365
  • Member since:
    10-09-2011
lol jep i know these games. I must say the numbers of 15:0 games increased badly!

Its really time that WG introduces WR related MM!

wynsen #3 Posted 18 September 2013 - 11:56 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11005 battles
  • 258
  • Member since:
    09-17-2011
Its EU2 again ;)

Michal_PL84 #4 Posted 18 September 2013 - 11:57 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17673 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    05-05-2012
But when You lose 0:15, other players won 15:0... Pls, don't tell me" "LEFT SIDE ALWAYS HAS WORST TANKS / PLAYERS" :)

Ze_HOFF_fverhoef #5 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:00 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 15159 battles
  • 3,136
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012
I dislike this kind of games. You know why?

1) I myself am rather careful in my approach to the enemy.
2) I'm also often in rather slow tanks (e.g. Churchill I, Matilda, AT-2)
3) But the time I realize I am in 'such' a game, it's already too late to catch up

This all results quite too often in me doing minimal damage. So I prefer more the kind of epic battles, where it can go either way (and then in the end we win of course).

DirtyWar #6 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:06 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32547 battles
  • 208
  • [TNAC] TNAC
  • Member since:
    10-04-2012

View PostPanzerkeks85, on 18 September 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:

lol jep i know these games. I must say the numbers of 15:0 games increased badly!

Its really time that WG introduces WR related MM!
yes, one of our team did a team kill... ;)

Queen_of_Neptune #7 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:07 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21202 battles
  • 221
  • [BIA-0] BIA-0
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011
Hmm, camo crew skill on heavy? Is it viable?

krazypenguin #8 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:07 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 27097 battles
  • 2,790
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-15-2011
I think everyone is missing the point here - it's not that it is 15-2.  It's that's 11 tanks on the enemy team did ZERO damage.  How is that even possible?  Amazing - I think that is the worst fail I have ever seen.

Edited by krazypenguin, 18 September 2013 - 12:07 PM.


war4peace #9 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:08 PM

    Colonel

  • Translator
  • 26976 battles
  • 3,830
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011
11 enemy players dealing a total of 0 damage. Wow. I am happy I don't play this game anymore.

MantrasOfWar #10 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 63554 battles
  • 1,374
  • [D57T] D57T
  • Member since:
    09-30-2011
i become sad no matter if i lose or win when this happend. It's sad when you see those potatos :(( and this crapMM

KptStrzyga #11 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33333 battles
  • 15,649
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2011
I think it was Hellcat and Cromwell from your team... They got most exp dealing little dmg. Good scouting does that. Enemy tanks are just dying.

View PostQueen_of_Neptune, on 18 September 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:

Hmm, camo crew skill on heavy? Is it viable?
As long as he is stationary camo works on heavy like on every other tank... It is low, but it is.

Edited by KptStrzyga, 18 September 2013 - 12:13 PM.


DirtyWar #12 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:11 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32547 battles
  • 208
  • [TNAC] TNAC
  • Member since:
    10-04-2012

View Postkrazypenguin, on 18 September 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:

I think everyone is missing the point here - it's not that it is 15-2.  It's that's 11 tanks on the enemy team did ZERO damage.  How is that even possible?  Amazing - I think that is the worst fail I have ever seen.
yes, thats the point, 11 didnt do any damage and the 4 others did less than my HP pool...

TBTSan #13 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:17 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38281 battles
  • 443
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011
I think, Hellcat+Cromwell did the spotting and enemy died to INVISIBLE FIRE.

bushwacker001 #14 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:22 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 27275 battles
  • 2,985
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View Postfverhoef, on 18 September 2013 - 12:00 PM, said:

I dislike this kind of games. You know why?


3) But the time I realize I am in 'such' a game, it's already too late to catch up




Half the time it's too easy to catch up especially on the losing side ;)

Ze_HOFF_fverhoef #15 Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:22 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 15159 battles
  • 3,136
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012

View Postkrazypenguin, on 18 September 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:

I think everyone is missing the point here - it's not that it is 15-2.  It's that's 11 tanks on the enemy team did ZERO damage.  How is that even possible?  Amazing - I think that is the worst fail I have ever seen.
The saddest part is that 1 of the 2 casualties on the winning team is caused by friendly fire.
Somehow it reminds me of the first gulf war in iraq (1990-1991).
edit: And the other casualty probably drowned himself

Edited by fverhoef, 18 September 2013 - 12:24 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users