Jump to content


Does this means no more nerfs ?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
14 replies to this topic

Darkblood96 #1 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
Good day lads.
Well, we do all know that Tiger 2 got slightly nerfed in v8.8
Spoiler                     
Whatsoever.
Posted Image
If he was gonna nerf the Tiger II last, since Tiger II was nerfed, does this means no more nerfs?  :trollface:
Edit PS: I am not trying to make an argument like "Tiger 2 got nerfed/buffed"
This topics point was just to make you forumites laugh  :amazed:

Edited by Darkblood96, 10 October 2013 - 03:58 PM.


Kvaak #2 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:48 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 13483 battles
  • 2,052
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010

View PostDarkblood96, on 10 October 2013 - 03:47 PM, said:

UFG got nerfed.
.
What? Also I think you forgot the fact the cupola got a massive buff. Oh, and that picture predates 8.8.

LaterTimeLord #3 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012
...Riiiiiiiiiiight. :ı

Darkblood96 #4 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostKvaak, on 10 October 2013 - 03:48 PM, said:

.
What? Also I think you forgot the fact the cupola got a massive buff. Oh, and that picture predates 8.8.
Please, I'm not trying to make an argument here. I said Tiger II got slightly nerfed; Its slightly because it had some buffs too.
Whatsoever, the thing here is not the tiger 2 got nerfed/buffed. This is a fun-thread if you havent noticed.
Edit: UFG Typo - Its LFG

Edited by Darkblood96, 10 October 2013 - 03:53 PM.


LaterTimeLord #5 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

View PostDarkblood96, on 10 October 2013 - 03:51 PM, said:

Tiger II got slightly nerfed; Its slightly because it had some buffs too.
You dumb post-modern n00b, have you noticed that KT is now shooting better than before, thanks to lower ground pressure and better stability?

Darkblood96 #6 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 10 October 2013 - 03:54 PM, said:

You dumb post-modern n00b, have you noticed that KT is now shooting better than before, thanks to lower ground pressure and better stability?

Have you noticed that its turning like an E-100 and its LFG can be penentrated by even T5 tanks?   :trollface:  :blinky:

Slyspy #7 Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14202 battles
  • 16,734
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011
The vehicle is improved IMO. One frontal weakspot (the MG) has gone altogether. One has been made much stonger (the cupola). A third has been make weaker, true, but it is the one which you can hide, just like you always used to anyway.

Darkblood96 #8 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:03 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostSlyspy, on 10 October 2013 - 03:59 PM, said:

The vehicle is improved IMO. One frontal weakspot (the MG) has gone altogether. One has been made much stonger (the cupola). A third has been make weaker, true, but it is the one which you can hide, just like you always used to anyway.

True that, but its traverse got hammernerfed, even an IS-3 can circle it now, it used to overrun even some meds, it was agile traverse-wise. Its not like that way now  :confused:

LaterTimeLord #9 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

View PostDarkblood96, on 10 October 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:

Have you noticed that its turning like an E-100 and its LFG can be penentrated by even T5 tanks?   :trollface:  :blinky:
In right hands, that tank turns into a trollsniper (rapidly shooting from distance and penetrating every single time)...

Darkblood96 #10 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 10 October 2013 - 04:04 PM, said:

In right hands, that tank turns into a trollsniper (rapidly shooting from distance and penetrating every single time)...

It seems you are the left hand here looking at your performance in Tiger II  :trollface:

Ps. 9.2s reload doesnt counts as rapid-shooting.

LaterTimeLord #11 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

View PostDarkblood96, on 10 October 2013 - 04:10 PM, said:

It seems you are the left hand here looking at your performance in Tiger II  :trollface:

Ps. 9.2s reload doesnt counts as rapid-shooting.
I blame EU pigs (Russians refer noobs as deers or crabs, that's not new) for it. And 5.7s of reload time does count as rapid-shooting.

Darkblood96 #12 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 10 October 2013 - 04:25 PM, said:

I blame EU pigs (Russians refer noobs as deers or crabs, that's not new) for it. And 5.7s of reload time does count as rapid-shooting.

Since when Tiger 2 shoots with 5.7s with L68?

Dude, stop drinking.

LaterTimeLord #13 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

View PostDarkblood96, on 10 October 2013 - 04:27 PM, said:

Since when Tiger 2 shoots with 5.7s with L68?

Dude, stop drinking.
Who said that I'm using the long 10.5cm on it? :trollface:

Darkblood96 #14 Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27095 battles
  • 1,273
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 10 October 2013 - 04:29 PM, said:

Who said that I'm using the long 10.5cm on it? :trollface:

If you dont then you have some issues :smile:

LaterTimeLord #15 Posted 11 October 2013 - 05:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

View PostDarkblood96, on 10 October 2013 - 04:38 PM, said:

If you dont then you have some issues :smile:
I'm not using 10.5cm since it's performance enhancement is actually negligible.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users