Jump to content


Introducing the new Hall of Fame


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
71 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 25,000
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Check out our new and improved Hall of Fame!

Full news text

Brynd #2 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:05 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Military Reserve
  • 151 battles
  • 352
  • Member since:
    09-11-2013
Ooh, shiny!

What do you think of it?

A_Hardy_Buck #3 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:07 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 4220 battles
  • 2,287
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013
If we could create custom filters for things such as top win% for players with over 10K battles ect it'd make the hall of fame really cool
.
.

But horray for me being number 423 on win rate  :glasses:
.
.
Which accounts were taken off ? Under 100 battles or under 1k or what was the criteria ?

Edited by A_Hardy_Buck, 06 November 2013 - 03:14 PM.


Murphy1up #4 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:09 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Military Reserve
  • 11249 battles
  • 7,282
  • [-QQ-] -QQ-
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012
Aw yeah rank 436,608 !

Posted Image

Arkhell #5 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:13 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 16942 battles
  • 6,748
  • Member since:
    09-20-2010
Your position in rating «Average Experience per Battle»: 801. You scored higher than 99.94% of players.
-
lol  :teethhappy:
Posted Image

Edited by Arkhell, 06 November 2013 - 03:15 PM.


KawaGreen #6 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:29 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 13307 battles
  • 1,931
  • [PIZZA] PIZZA
  • Member since:
    04-30-2011
1. Pick timespan: 1day
2. Sort on Games played.
3. Get the top number.
4. Divide it by 24
5. Be amazed on the amount of battles that guy plays per hour (if he plays 24 hours a day)
Edit: just check like the top 10 and check their WN7 and all stuff  :blinky:

Edited by KawaGreen, 06 November 2013 - 03:39 PM.


ngardet #7 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 36789 battles
  • 118
  • Member since:
    02-10-2012
So now you can't tell us you can't identify bots without us reporting, there is at least 3 in the first page of the 1-day results, like one "guy" with more than 600 battles and 1 frag.

krazypenguin #8 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:38 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 27097 battles
  • 2,790
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-15-2011

View PostKawaGreen, on 06 November 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

1. Pick timespan: 1day
2. Sort on Games played.
3. Get the top number.
4. Divide it by 24
5. Be amased on the amount of battles that guy plays per hour (if he plays 24 hours a day)
Edit: just check like the top 10 and check their WN7 and all stuff  :blinky:
.
You forgot 1 vital step.
6. Go to the official Wargaming "A little insight on bot's & afk's and what to do!" thread and read about how seriously they take AFKers\bots and leeches.
.
EDIT - The new hall of fame looks great guys, nice work.

Edited by krazypenguin, 06 November 2013 - 03:47 PM.


rewwer #9 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:42 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30721 battles
  • 6,916
  • [RWWR] RWWR
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

View PostBrynd, on 06 November 2013 - 03:05 PM, said:

Ooh, shiny!

What do you think of it?

Bots, bots and more bots, select stats of 1 day, order for games played and tell me that those players dont are bots, omg pls start ban people
700 games in 1 day???????

rewwer #10 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:43 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30721 battles
  • 6,916
  • [RWWR] RWWR
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

View PostKawaGreen, on 06 November 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

1. Pick timespan: 1day
2. Sort on Games played.
3. Get the top number.
4. Divide it by 24
5. Be amazed on the amount of battles that guy plays per hour (if he plays 24 hours a day)
Edit: just check like the top 10 and check their WN7 and all stuff  :blinky:

I dont read your post sry, totally agree.

MisterCro #11 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Community Contributor
  • 47643 battles
  • 758
  • [EXNOM] EXNOM
  • Member since:
    09-11-2012
It is imposible to play 700 games in a day! How?? That mean that he play game every 1.8 minute, if u calculate 40 sec of fining game, 40 sec of begginig, he just enter the battle and go out, 24 h a day, count it, day have 1440 minutes, he play 770 battles in a day, imposible? Or he all day klick tanks and dont eat dont sleep dont go to toilet . That must be some error in calculating

Edited by MisterCro, 06 November 2013 - 03:47 PM.


cittytm #12 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29958 battles
  • 135
  • Member since:
    10-05-2011
Your position in rating 9,391. You scored higher than 99.26% of players. Hell ya,another 10 000 years and i will be better

AngryBanana #13 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:48 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 15471 battles
  • 2,906
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
lol at the number 6 in games played in the last day, 397 games 1 kill, but:

View PostIPaul72, on 29 October 2013 - 11:17 AM, said:

Hello allWe are posting this to make you aware on Wargaming's stance on the use of Bots.As you will read below this is a matter that is taken very seriously by WG and we will continue to do our very best to resolve the problem they create.So to the document from our customer support section


BeowulfN7 #14 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:49 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 31834 battles
  • 17
  • Member since:
    01-26-2013
ahm question here i saw the same HALL OF FAME on the asian site a day a go and now i see the old 1 .... so why did you turn back to that 1 on the asian server ? and why are you trying to shuv it over here ?

SanyaJuutilainen #15 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:50 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20686 battles
  • 1,875
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
An idea for implementing - upon hovering over your stats (maybe your own only, maybe all of the visible ones?) you can see how far they rank overall in some hover box. Currently even after you filter yourself you have to click through all the columns to see how you rank in all the categories, which creates more requests (IMO) than if you loaded these along with the player searched.

Example: I go to my name in ratings. Upon hovering over my highest XP I can also see I am 123,456th in it among all players, even when I have currently selected the column for games played.

gelezinisNAGAS #16 Posted 06 November 2013 - 03:51 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24068 battles
  • 280
  • Member since:
    01-09-2012
I dont know what is this glich, it shows me that page should be in english, istead its in, well... I dont know french I guess. I tryed to select other languages (there is no english selection) it changes to other languages. How the hell I can change language to english. I really want to check this new "hall of fame"

gmomkey #17 Posted 06 November 2013 - 04:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 49414 battles
  • 25
  • [GLOBS] GLOBS
  • Member since:
    03-12-2011
its a great idea guys but needs some tweaking and removing of the bots etc .  :unsure:
So there will be a patch soon??   :hiding:

Homer_J #18 Posted 06 November 2013 - 04:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27485 battles
  • 28,541
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
Hall of what?

And I thought naming and shaming was not allowed.

Please WG, take a look at the players with the most battles in the last week, they are seriously extracting the urine.

ThunderLeopard #19 Posted 06 November 2013 - 04:16 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 6216 battles
  • 168
  • Member since:
    06-20-2013
Lol my average xp per battle is higher than 99.96% of players

SchnauzerFaust #20 Posted 06 November 2013 - 04:20 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 8471 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    09-09-2010
Okay...700 games in 1 day? Really? Or even 500...or 300... I do hope those are bots, or otherwise these people need help :D

Hall of fame looks great!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users