Jump to content


Pershing accuracy is getting nerfed


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
156 replies to this topic

Gatt #141 Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 18208 battles
  • 644
  • Member since:
    04-27-2010

View Postlivehosting, on 17 May 2011 - 12:40 PM, said:

0.6.4 has been release. Pershing got nerfed.

You mean accuracy from .36 to .37 ?

MajorStarLord #142 Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:39 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 54262 battles
  • 499
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    11-05-2010
Yes

MajorStarLord #143 Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 54262 battles
  • 499
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    11-05-2010

View PostOverlord, on 24 April 2011 - 12:26 PM, said:

It will be able to hit targets at up to 300m away while moving. The purpose of the adjustment is to encourage more active gameplay on Pershing especially marching fire.

I don't see any difference and it doesn't encourage me for more active gameplay. Why the hell did you have to nerf it?!? FAIL.

Jovisfulmina #144 Posted 17 May 2011 - 05:41 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21711 battles
  • 267
  • Member since:
    03-07-2011
0.01m less accuracy is absolutely insignificant, you cannot call that a nerf.

Koo294 #145 Posted 17 May 2011 - 05:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 14907 battles
  • 737
  • Member since:
    09-13-2010

View Postlivehosting, on 17 May 2011 - 12:40 PM, said:

0.6.4 has been release. Pershing got buffed.
ftfy, have you seriously not read the last few pages? I do not understand how a .01 accuracy nerf is worse than a 10% accuracy on movement increase.

MajorStarLord #146 Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:41 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 54262 battles
  • 499
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    11-05-2010
10% accuracy when moving is totaly bullshit. It's just not there. Yeah, maybe once from 50 tries. Circle is gigantic at long range while moving.

MajorStarLord #147 Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 54262 battles
  • 499
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    11-05-2010

View PostJovisfulmina, on 17 May 2011 - 05:41 PM, said:

0.01m less accuracy is absolutely insignificant, you cannot call that a nerf.

It's an important nerf because i can't hit shit from 300 meters.

MajorStarLord #148 Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:48 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 54262 battles
  • 499
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    11-05-2010
What is the exact buff value for that 10%? 10% from what?

Jovisfulmina #149 Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:56 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21711 battles
  • 267
  • Member since:
    03-07-2011
0.36 = 1.08 meters dispersion radius at 300 meters
0.37 = 1.11 meters dispersion radius at 300 meters
It represents 2.8% more dispersion and those 0.03meters, which means 3 centimeters, are negligibles when you hit a target of 3 meters high and 9 meters long.

Lobo #150 Posted 18 May 2011 - 08:13 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 3681 battles
  • 262
  • Member since:
    07-14-2010

View PostJovisfulmina, on 17 May 2011 - 10:56 PM, said:

0.36 = 1.08 meters dispersion radius at 300 meters
0.37 = 1.11 meters dispersion radius at 300 meters
It represents 2.8% more dispersion and those 0.03meters, which means 3 centimeters, are negligibles when you hit a target of 3 meters high and 9 meters long.

If it's so insignificant then why nerf it ? why instead of 0.37 they don't put it a 0.35 it's so insignificant that could be done... or not ?

Kyphe #151 Posted 18 May 2011 - 09:34 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 16253 battles
  • 2,023
  • Member since:
    03-26-2011
It probably gives a collective hit ratio margin over every Pershing in the game to bring it in line with some imagined level of accuracy for game balance

Koo294 #152 Posted 18 May 2011 - 07:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 14907 battles
  • 737
  • Member since:
    09-13-2010

View Postlivehosting, on 17 May 2011 - 10:48 PM, said:

What is the exact buff value for that 10%? 10% from what?
10% increase from before the patch. And before the patch it was pretty damned good. So i don't doubt the devs saying you can hit stuff at 300m. Perhaps your pershing does not have vertstab/100% crew?

Also, given the playstyle of the pershing is to be almost constantly on the move (or rocking, which also benefits from accuracy on the move), this is not a nerf. How hard is it to understand? Are you seriously suggesting that you play the pershing by sitting in a bush and long distance sniping?

Boo_the_hamster #153 Posted 20 May 2011 - 11:44 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 365 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    05-03-2011
New pershing is awesome and rocks hard in right hands. It hs best moving accuracy in the game, if you can use this thing, coupled with best sight distance and very good maneurability, you will become a game-changer even with below-average team.

MajorStarLord #154 Posted 24 May 2011 - 06:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 54262 battles
  • 499
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    11-05-2010
Not it's not. This so called buff is not there. I can't feel it or test it. But i do feel the nerf.

Gatt #155 Posted 25 May 2011 - 05:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 18208 battles
  • 644
  • Member since:
    04-27-2010
How a +0.01 accuracy can change, in the view of developers, the game balance is something I'll never understand.

Anyway, I dont care anymore, I play and if they ruin a tank, I'll change it with another one.

So far I havent noticed any material difference with the pre patch Pershing. Maybe the 110% crew and the vert.stab. help.

I seldom fire at distances greater than 300mt.

jincx #156 Posted 30 May 2011 - 12:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19285 battles
  • 196
  • Member since:
    02-03-2011
they just realised  pershing was making profit alot better then t54 so they decided to nerf its accuracy.ppl are now wasting more rounds then before.
  accuracy on the move is useless.im not hitting anything beyond 100m while moving (with stabilizer installed).So this is just a lie.They are forcing you to waste more rounds,thats all.Dont fall into this bait

Razgrid #157 Posted 15 June 2011 - 10:51 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 7885 battles
  • 52
  • Member since:
    11-08-2010
i cant hit a shit now with pershing thats 300m+ away from me or sometimes closer my shoots just go wide...was aiming at isu152 that was standing side to me about 350m away 3shoots - 3miss. sux




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users