Jump to content


I`m fed up with this game.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
63 replies to this topic

adanailov #1 Posted 06 December 2013 - 12:52 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13649 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    02-25-2012
Yes  ,  i am fed  up  with  the  game ,  Fed  up  with  how matchmaking  is  tier 6 vs tier 8 ; tier 7 vs tier 9; tier 8 vs tier 10.

Battles  are  more  and  more  borring. I am fed  up  being  killed  just  because  the  hellcat  and  new  german destroyers  have  an op view range.  Cannot  play  anymore  on  how  the  game  is  right now.

So much things  in this  game  to  piss  you  out  and  get  frustrated  and  crazy .   Ammo is  not  being  accurate  lately i  see  my  ammo  flying over  tanks  and  flying down into the  ground .

This  game  needs  badly  improvements  ah  ye  ballance  even  ballance on  the  tanks  15 vs 15 is not good .


sniping  is  becoming  very  frustrating  and  boring  due  to the  new  tanks  with  mega  op  view  ranges   as  they  see  me  from  afar .

everybothy  spot  me  from afar  and  shoots  on  me  and i  just  can`t  return fire  cause  i  don`t see  them .

the cup of  water  is  going to spill out  for  me  for  this game  its  getting  out of  my  patience ,

4runner #2 Posted 06 December 2013 - 12:56 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7360 battles
  • 113
  • Member since:
    02-10-2011
The door is on the left, bye bye...

AngryApple #3 Posted 06 December 2013 - 12:58 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7495 battles
  • 1,575
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011
nobody cares

Edited by AngryApple, 06 December 2013 - 12:58 AM.


adanailov #4 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:01 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13649 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    02-25-2012
i dont  care  too about  you answers !

Trollin1 #5 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:02 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2428 battles
  • 760
  • Member since:
    10-22-2013
Are we to read this with long pauses between words?

Edited by Thecageyone, 06 December 2013 - 01:03 AM.


Fantabulousness #6 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:03 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 50 battles
  • 476
  • Member since:
    11-11-2013

View Postadanailov, on 06 December 2013 - 01:01 AM, said:

i dont  care  too about  you answers !
Then why post here in the first place?

CircleOfSorrow #7 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:06 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29236 battles
  • 2,136
  • Member since:
    12-26-2012

View Postadanailov, on 06 December 2013 - 01:01 AM, said:

i dont care too about you answers !

Well, this is awkward :|

Were you not inviting answers when you started the thread?

Oh, you know what...I have to be...someplace else...



NarcoMerc #8 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:13 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26804 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-19-2011
Why do people complain about facing higher tiers? when I first started playing I took facing higher tier tanks as a learning experience on how to target weak points, and even today I still prefer playing tier 7 & 8 so I can face a challenge against tiers 9 & 10.
Learn to improvise and adapt against your opponents.

Evil_Mungo #9 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:23 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Clan Commander
  • 28225 battles
  • 3,332
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    06-12-2012
I totally empathise with you OP.  This one time I played a game that I didn't like, then I stopped playing that game.

Good times.

SBKDisco #10 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:33 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38423 battles
  • 1,276
  • Member since:
    02-26-2011

View PostT0mmy_Bl0w, on 06 December 2013 - 01:13 AM, said:

I still prefer playing tier 7 & 8 so I can face a challenge against tiers 9 & 10.

Bull****

NarcoMerc #11 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:46 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26804 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    07-19-2011
Check my stats, most played tier is 8. Can't fake 20k+ matches.

Industrial7 #12 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:47 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3286 battles
  • 483
  • Member since:
    12-08-2012
When did these topics work again?

Oh yeah, never.

Ragwin #13 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:49 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22014 battles
  • 181
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013
Imagine how crap it must have been for the Iraqis facing M1 Abrams in their T-55's.

Merquise #14 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:05 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 27130 battles
  • 4,582
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011

View PostRagwin, on 06 December 2013 - 01:49 AM, said:

Imagine how crap it must have been for the Iraqis facing M1 Abrams in their T-55's.

I think 99% of the T55's were destroyed by artillery air support like helicopters and airplanes.

Ragwin #15 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:06 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22014 battles
  • 181
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013
What is wrong with mixed tier matches is that the heavy tanks are always the higher tier and the lighter tanks are the lower tier.   It should be the other way around.

Ragwin #16 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:07 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22014 battles
  • 181
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013

View PostMerquise, on 06 December 2013 - 02:05 AM, said:

I think 99% of the T55's were destroyed by artillery air support like helicopters and airplanes.

What do you think the M1 Abrams were firing at then?  There are plenty of accounts of M1's and Challengers knocking out T-55's and T-62's.

Merquise #17 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:14 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 27130 battles
  • 4,582
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011

View PostRagwin, on 06 December 2013 - 02:07 AM, said:

What do you think the M1 Abrams were firing at then?  There are plenty of accounts of M1's and Challengers knocking out T-55's and T-62's.

Maybe a few.

But I think it would be strategically stupid to use tank vs tank when you got 100% air superiority.
So I'm assuming the biggest majority of enemy 'tanks' were destroyed by air support/rockets etc etc.

That war wasn't a game made by WG where stupidity after stupidity clogs the battlefield....
Anyhoo if you find some numbers of tanks destroyed by other tanks I'm interested to know.

Brent_Rambo #18 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:15 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3171 battles
  • 112
  • [JELLY] JELLY
  • Member since:
    11-16-2013
take       deep       breath       after       every      word    .

BattleMetalChris #19 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:30 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 9224 battles
  • 7,685
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
Posted Image

Ragwin #20 Posted 06 December 2013 - 02:37 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22014 battles
  • 181
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013

View PostMerquise, on 06 December 2013 - 02:14 AM, said:

Maybe a few.
But I think it would be strategically stupid to use tank vs tank when you got 100% air superiority.
So I'm assuming the biggest majority of enemy 'tanks' were destroyed by air support/rockets etc etc.
You're assuming wrong.   During Desert Storm the tankers wanted blood on their barrels.  They didn't want to play second fiddle to the RAF and USAAF.  Though Apache's did take out a lot as well.   The airforces were too busy performing interdiction; blowing up bridges, stockpiles, radar installations and hitting SCUD sites.
And knocking out tanks is considered too dirty a business by RAF pilots.

Edited by Ragwin, 06 December 2013 - 02:41 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users