Jump to content


tech tree that would give you hemorrhoids, and lots of ragequit


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
18 replies to this topic

Guts_and_Glory #1 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6851 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    11-20-2013
tier I:
(L)Renault FT

tier II:
???

tierIII:
(L)pz 38(t)
(M)
(SPG)su26
(TD)???


tier IV:
(L)amx-40
(M)m3 lee
(H)d.w.2, b1
(TD)sau40
(SPG)???

tier V:
(L)???
(M)PZ.IV
(H)VK 30.01(H)
(TD)???
(SPG)bishop

tier VI:
(L)T-21
(M)A-43
(H)???
(TD) jagpz.IV or churchill GC?
(SPG)???

tier VII:
(L)Aufkl.Panther
(M)KV-13
(H)KV-3?
(TD)SU-100M1
(SPG)???

tier VIII:
(L)???
(M)???
(H)VK.45.02(A)
(TD)SU-101
(SPG)???

tier IX:
(M)Lorraine 40(t)
(H)VK45.02(B)
(TD)T95
(SPG)???

tier X:
(M)???
(H)FV215b?
(TD)OBJ.263
(SPG)???


what did you think?

A_Hardy_Buck #2 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:06 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 4220 battles
  • 2,287
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013
I think you don't know what you're on about

Sapaki #3 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9331 battles
  • 1,620
  • [SGTA] SGTA
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012
I have ragequitted on numerous occasions and do have hemorrhoids, but I am absolutely positive that it has nothing to do with WoT, or some randomly chosen vehicles put on a list and sorted per Tier and tank type.
.
Am I normal?
.
Edit: I think I got it. OP (in an alt account) is trying to list the worst tanks by Tier and tank type. Unfortunately I am affraid that I have to disagree with many of his choices.

Edited by Sapaki, 06 December 2013 - 01:19 PM.


Ganscs #4 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35983 battles
  • 231
  • Member since:
    07-04-2012
There is nothing wrong with KV-13, KV-3, FV215b, and as I hear Lorraine got usable with the recent gun depression/elevation buff.
Seriously, I like my FV better than my E-100, if you get penned in E-100 right through the mantlet you rage, in FV if you get penned is business as usual.

pun_xD #5 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:30 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34170 battles
  • 825
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011
worst mistake: putting the obj 263 on that list. it is just an awesome tank, not easy to play though. with the other tanks, you might be right, but its just personal preferance. some ppl just love the T95 for the stronk armor.
good/bad tanks almost always depend on the player

Guts_and_Glory #6 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6851 battles
  • 28
  • Member since:
    11-20-2013

View PostGanscs, on 06 December 2013 - 01:29 PM, said:

There is nothing wrong with KV-13, KV-3, FV215b, and as I hear Lorraine got usable with the recent gun depression/elevation buff.
Seriously, I like my FV better than my E-100, if you get penned in E-100 right through the mantlet you rage, in FV if you get penned is business as usual.
i really liked kv3 when it was on tier VI.
but now.
it have same frontal hull armor as IS, and he's much much slower.

i just trying get idea how would tech tree of worst tanks would look.
dind;t had kv13 but ppl said its worst medium on tier VII

Ganscs #7 Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:44 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35983 battles
  • 231
  • Member since:
    07-04-2012

View PostGuts_and_Glory, on 06 December 2013 - 01:32 PM, said:

i really liked kv3 when it was on tier VI.
but now.
it have same frontal hull armor as IS, and he's much much slower.

i just trying get idea how would tech tree of worst tanks would look.
dind;t had kv13 but ppl said its worst medium on tier VII
I just added my opinion on tanks I'm driving or has been driving in the past. All tier7 meds are pretty meh but I found KV-13 decent enough. Worse than T20 but definetly better than the frontal burning T-43 or the VK3002D. KV-3 is faster than it looks, though it's not an IS for sure. I used it with the 107ZiS for better DPM, 122 works better on the IS.

joyuesp #8 Posted 06 December 2013 - 09:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51337 battles
  • 7,696
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    01-22-2012

View PostGuts_and_Glory, on 06 December 2013 - 01:03 PM, said:

tier I:
(L)Renault FT

tier II:
???

tierIII:
(L)pz 38(t)
(M)
(SPG)su26
(TD)???


tier IV:
(L)amx-40
(M)m3 lee
(H)d.w.2, b1
(TD)sau40
(SPG)???

tier V:
(L)???
(M)PZ.IV
(H)VK 30.01(H)
(TD)???
(SPG)bishop

tier VI:
(L)T-21
(M)A-43
(H)???
(TD) jagpz.IV or churchill GC?
(SPG)???

tier VII:
(L)Aufkl.Panther
(M)KV-13
(H)KV-3?
(TD)SU-100M1
(SPG)???

tier VIII:
(L)???
(M)???
(H)VK.45.02(A)
(TD)SU-101
(SPG)???

tier IX:
(M)Lorraine 40(t)
(H)VK45.02(B)
(TD)T95
(SPG)???

tier X:
(M)???
(H)FV215b?
(TD)OBJ.263
(SPG)???


what did you think?
there arent bad t1-3, just use something better than a lame 50% crew.

pz4 still is a nice medium
vk3001 is a good sniper with better hp pool than stug.
t21 is better than amx12t and vk2801, again the bad players with bad crews strikes again.
a43 is a proper medium, fast, high rof, aceptable cammo, lacks gun, but you can flank with him.
kv3 turret is annoying, isnt the old kv3 but can be really annoying used properly.
su100m1 small with good cammo, lacks a bit of pen, but is really good in proper hands.
vk4502a trades armor and pen for extra rof and agility, just average.
vk4502p i bought it recently, not as good as the e75 but is great for sidescrapping.

of the list i wouldnt/dont want to play again the lorraine, su101, aufpanther, jpz4(maybe full cammo and gold), kv13 sau amx40, t1/m6 and grind any of the arti lines

HowTheStoryEnds #9 Posted 06 December 2013 - 10:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24695 battles
  • 1,294
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    12-17-2012
Imagining hemorrhoids with wot RNG just sends chills up my spine. D:

ClassicFrog #10 Posted 06 December 2013 - 10:53 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 44705 battles
  • 2,981
  • Member since:
    04-05-2012

View PostGuts_and_Glory, on 06 December 2013 - 01:03 PM, said:

tier I:
(L)Renault FT You should try Vickers Medium Mk 1

tier II:
??? Definitely Vickers Medium Mk 2

tierIII:
(L)pz 38(t) It's pretty awesome actually! I'd go for D1
(M) Vickers Medium Mk 3 of course
(SPG)su26
(TD)???


tier IV:
(L)amx-40
(M)m3 lee
(H)d.w.2, b1
(TD)sau40
(SPG)???

tier V:
(L)???
(M)PZ.IV
(H)VK 30.01(H)
(TD)??? Pz.Sfl. IVc, just because it's either epic win or total fail, depending  on whether you got spotted or not.
(SPG)bishop

tier VI:
(L)T-21
(M)A-43
(H)???
(TD) jagpz.IV or churchill GC? Churchill GC without a shadow of doubt.
(SPG)???

tier VII:
(L)Aufkl.Panther
(M)KV-13
(H)KV-3? I couldn't make it work. I hated it with passion.
(TD)SU-100M1
(SPG)???

tier VIII:
(L)???
(M)???
(H)VK.45.02(A)
(TD)SU-101
(SPG)???

tier IX:
(M)Lorraine 40(t)
(H)VK45.02(B)
(TD)T95 SU-122-54 - there is a reason people don't play it.
(SPG)???

tier X:
(M)???
(H)FV215b?
(TD)OBJ.263
(SPG)???


what did you think?


SturmJagdTiger #11 Posted 07 December 2013 - 12:48 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14900 battles
  • 258
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
sau 40 weak ? just put on the derp and fill it with gold. its just a slower hetzer and since alot of people consider it bad they arent afraid of u and become easy kills

Pandabird #12 Posted 07 December 2013 - 01:06 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,526
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
thanks for telling us what tanks you suck at.


and that's a big list.

clixor #13 Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:23 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 51031 battles
  • 3,031
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011
wz-120 stock is terribad as well.. upgraded gun is a bit better but i still think it's one of the suckiest tier9s..

waxx25 #14 Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:57 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32434 battles
  • 1,421
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011

View Postclixor, on 07 December 2013 - 04:23 AM, said:

wz-120 stock is terribad as well.. upgraded gun is a bit better but i still think it's one of the suckiest tier9s..
LOL, fully upgraded wz 120 is a beast......next you will say that the t54 is underpowered and needs buff

ysk #15 Posted 07 December 2013 - 05:01 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 41123 battles
  • 4,489
  • Member since:
    04-14-2012

View Postclixor, on 07 December 2013 - 04:23 AM, said:

wz-120 stock is terribad as well.. upgraded gun is a bit better but i still think it's one of the suckiest tier9s..

99% of stock tanks are crap.

And, Wz-120 is one hell of a tank. ;)

Firstcasuality #16 Posted 07 December 2013 - 06:11 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29204 battles
  • 203
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
While i agree on most of tanks listed but i must say i am enjoying lorraine 40t grind atm.
T54e1 felt worst for some reason.

Edited by Firstcasuality, 07 December 2013 - 06:13 AM.


Gruminmor #17 Posted 07 December 2013 - 11:13 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14723 battles
  • 1,389
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012
I liked my Pz38(t)
You have no clue what you're talking about.

SnowRelic #18 Posted 07 December 2013 - 12:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22820 battles
  • 589
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-14-2012
The Pz38(t) is pretty good for a tier 3. It's sneaky and got enough view range to do its job at tier 5. Its cannon can deal with tier 5 heavies. It can snipe perfectly well over 500m - at that tier it doesn't need to aim for weak spots. It's in the German tech tree. Don't play it like the brawler it isn't.

The B1 is the best suicide scout in the game. By the time you're at the enemy base you don't face all their guns and your teammates are actually in position to shoot back. It isn't fast, but it is agile. It's got armor and hit points too. The gun's pathetic but with considering the whole package something did have to give. And it's great that it's the gun. With a bit of aiming you can make up for it while you do get to keep the preferential match-making.

M3 Lee isn't all bad. It packs a decent punch. It can bounce some shots. Just don't go at it alone and manage the distance to the enemy. Too close and it's easy prey, too far and the gun's inaccuracy will show. And don't engage the enemy head on.

The Panzer IV isn't bad. It's problem is that at tier 5 there are plenty of other mediums and between them the PzIV isn't outstanding. It's a bit bland and grey.

The JagdPanzerIV is just a StugIII debugged. It doesn't get one-shotted by a Russian 122mm and it doesn't run out of ammo as quick. You can err and frustrate yourself by putting the short 88 on it instead of the L/70 and you might forget to keep in mind that sometimes you do need a suspension upgrade (or free xp tracks) to mount some stuff.

And the T-21 is OK as well. It's speedy, nimble and mounts an M1A2. It is easy to get into trouble with it and it lacks the staying power and/or topspeed to get out of trouble. Think hard before commiting. Always start with conservative passive spotting and don't go ninja until the map has opened up a bit. It's good at staying hidden, but due to its size it can be hard to find hard cover or a big enough bush. Once you do have room for action, it is fun to drive. Not quite as good as a Cromwell, but you can mount a v-stab and your opponents don't run out of hit points too soon.

What do I think? Considering the list it might just be you trying to force your playstyle on several tanks, discovering it doesn't work and then blame the tank. I don't like slow, paper-thin tanks with howitzers. Seen enough people who made those kinds of tanks work. All the more power to them. If a tech tree came up that featured primairily those kinds of tanks, I'd either ignore it or learn how to play them.

Effing_Drako #19 Posted 09 December 2013 - 10:51 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 26671 battles
  • 7,661
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011
Amx40 is a very good tank my good sir




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users