Jump to content


Worst player ever?

terrible awful how omg

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
35 replies to this topic

MemoFromTurner #1 Posted 07 January 2014 - 10:56 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17455 battles
  • 286
  • [ELC-P] ELC-P
  • Member since:
    10-14-2011

Hi, we've all had noobs - heavies who sit in base, lights who don't scout (even passively), TDs who face rocks/walls, medium who don't know how to flank etc. etc.

 

However, have you ever seen a worse player?

 

Of course, I've hidden his name because naming and shaming is bad...mmm okay?!

 

WR of 43%, average damage of just 75

 

Possesses no mastery badges despite 3,687 battles.

 

So what's the worst you've seen?

Attached Files

  • Attached File   worst play ever.png   908.56K


John_Preston #2 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:00 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17436 battles
  • 6,373
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012
bots...you can see them in every battle.

Ronin81 #3 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:29 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25993 battles
  • 492
  • Member since:
    05-16-2011
He owns noobz in pz 38 na

JoonHilt #4 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10181 battles
  • 538
  • Member since:
    12-24-2011
I saw guy with -37wn7, remember of himbeing in a clan of whiner, who ranted something here in forums

Teadaemon #5 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 35553 battles
  • 81
  • [GLOBS] GLOBS
  • Member since:
    07-17-2013
The worst player I've seen in a battle (who was definitely an actual human - nobody would program a bot to be that gormless) had 60 battles, yet owned a Lowe (which he was driving at the time), a JagdTiger 88, and a Pz IV Schmallturm. Possibly the definitive wallet warrior, he was every bit as useless as you'd imagine (decided to go down into the valley on Westfield and climb the hill on the other side, before reconsidering and hiding in the village in the middle).

Inflatable #6 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11805 battles
  • 1,273
  • [CYW] CYW
  • Member since:
    03-15-2011

Funny how a bot can get 43% winrate in this game, yet I've seen real players with even lower.. Lowest I've seen sofar was 38% I think..



Major_cjs #7 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:47 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 3836 battles
  • 3,375
  • Member since:
    10-27-2013
YAY it wasn't about me :great: 

speedphlux #8 Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:57 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44197 battles
  • 1,808
  • [TZAR] TZAR
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011

This guys is good. I've seen a guy, in a T57 Heavy, with well over 1k battles in that tank alone ... with the amazing 44%WR and 0.86 KD Ratio. I let him empty two HEAT clips at my Fail Lowe, because there were more important targets for me to shoot at - like a WT E-100 that just started to reload and a juicy KV-4, which actually did more damage in a Tier 10 game then the said T57 Heavy driver, despite dying earlier in the game.

 

In all fairness, I think every T57 Heavy owner should thank that guy for keeping the tank's WR balance in check, so that WG don't nerf it to the ground. So you see, even donkeys have their usage in WoT.



Darth_Woras #9 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:16 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 62 battles
  • 2,878
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013
I am the worst.

jokobet #10 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:18 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31283 battles
  • 653
  • Member since:
    12-03-2012

34% wr overall, 35% in the T-54 after having played several thousand battles in the T-54 alone (the T-54 games counted for about half his overall battle count, so reaching beyond 5k battles overall). Average dmg per game in the T-54 below the alpha damage of 320. Didn't record it and forgot the name but the memory still haunts me.

 

Edit: Tbh, I can't believe it myself - don't know whether that's just a bad dream, an XVM error or a player who eventually gave up.


Edited by jokobet, 08 January 2014 - 12:30 AM.


Gromle #11 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:25 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15152 battles
  • 732
  • [TRV] TRV
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

View PostInflatable, on 07 January 2014 - 11:40 PM, said:

Funny how a bot can get 43% winrate in this game, yet I've seen real players with even lower.. Lowest I've seen sofar was 38% I think..

 

I do remember some screenshots of a guy with 17% winrate. I still wonder how that is possible. He had over 1000 matches.



Darth_Woras #12 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:26 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 62 battles
  • 2,878
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013
RU have 2% WR with 1k. HOW?!

Jigabachi #13 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:33 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17946 battles
  • 19,289
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

If I would open a thread for every bot/bad player... wait. I already calculated how much useless data this forum would contain then.

 

Go and find my post in one of the X other "Worst player evaaar"-threads.



Inflatable #14 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:43 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11805 battles
  • 1,273
  • [CYW] CYW
  • Member since:
    03-15-2011

View PostGromle, on 08 January 2014 - 12:25 AM, said:

 

I do remember some screenshots of a guy with 17% winrate. I still wonder how that is possible. He had over 1000 matches.

 

With truely random matchmaking that should be impossible really..

 

But nothing surprises me anymore in this game.. Only thing WoT is consitent at is it's inconsistency..



SmileyMan73 #15 Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:49 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13182 battles
  • 441
  • [MACE] MACE
  • Member since:
    10-03-2012

Lets face it. They say a normal WR is 49%.

 

So anything lower means the player actively helps the other team win though his actions or inaction.

 

With some of the players I seen tonight I will be ok for ketchup all year now.  Worst was a 11v12 capped loss. (DA!!! Whats the white thing with tanks in it. Erm whats that moving bar mean!)


Edited by SmileyMan73, 08 January 2014 - 12:49 AM.


RichardNixon #16 Posted 08 January 2014 - 02:03 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 4395 battles
  • 2,351
  • Member since:
    06-26-2013

View PostGromle, on 08 January 2014 - 12:25 AM, said:

 

I do remember some screenshots of a guy with 17% winrate. I still wonder how that is possible. He had over 1000 matches.

 

It's usually from company battles. You can get pretty low by platooning with two other terrible players, but not that low.

 

The OP's player is about as low as you can go solo. Might be a botter as well as a legitimately terrible player.

 

 



Motoroilspill #17 Posted 08 January 2014 - 02:19 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 5226 battles
  • 83
  • Member since:
    05-27-2013
OP's post just further shows how terribly useless most of the scout tanks are where your death(even if you are a skilled player) means nothing much changed and you can get a 57% win rate regardless of your skill.

Homer_J #18 Posted 08 January 2014 - 02:30 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28992 battles
  • 30,516
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostInflatable, on 07 January 2014 - 10:40 PM, said:

Funny how a bot can get 43% winrate in this game, yet I've seen real players with even lower..

 

That is because bots don't do anything to actively bring the team down, they don't drive off into obvious ambushes, they don't block team mates, etc.  And on the positive side they sit in base and spot ninja cappers.



REDdemidry #19 Posted 08 January 2014 - 06:44 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50 battles
  • 679
  • Member since:
    06-03-2013

That's an easy one.

 

The worst player ever is.......the WoT player.

 

There are exceptions, yes. Way too few to change the rule.

What, you don't believe it? Go ahead, start the game and have a few more battles but I think you already got the picture since long ago.


Edited by REDdemidry, 08 January 2014 - 06:48 AM.


DogSix #20 Posted 08 January 2014 - 08:08 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2026 battles
  • 782
  • Member since:
    11-06-2011
If I'd had a 39% WR I'd be quitting a long time ago. So much fun to lose all the time. I believe only ret.ards (medical term) can enjoy losing so much.

Edited by DogSix, 08 January 2014 - 08:08 AM.






Also tagged with terrible, awful, how, omg

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users