Jump to content


I doesn't worth it


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
45 replies to this topic

1st_Flag_Gr #1 Posted 10 January 2014 - 03:04 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5024 battles
  • 27
  • [RATMA] RATMA
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011
I bileve for my shelf that i am an averege player i spend last month a lot of money to convert experience for having the obj.140, two days now i have this tank i am all the time at battles with loses the tank bielive doesn't worth the time and i dont enjoy the game any more they should make the battles not only by tier but also by player skills, one think is sure i dont give again not even a cent of money for this game also i notice strange thinks that we dident have back at beta times i am sorry how this game ends up the television spot did the job brought money again but destroy the game they dont care because you will be at the next one planes ships etc.

John_Preston #2 Posted 10 January 2014 - 03:18 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17436 battles
  • 6,373
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

It's because a newbie(sorry but that's th truth) with only 2k battles. You really have nothing to do in tierX battles. You are the kind of player who makes experienced players rage when they see you in their team. You spent money to rush all the way up to tierX when you have no idea how to play higher tiers? Well sir, it's is all your fault.

 

I just bought my first tierX after 8k battles and even i suck with it...i'm just about to reach average stats in my tierIX.

 

You should be at ~tier6 right now...even if you played the beta...the game changed a lot since then.


Edited by John_Preston, 10 January 2014 - 03:21 PM.


Darth_Woras #3 Posted 10 January 2014 - 03:42 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 62 battles
  • 2,878
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013
I believe in your shelf.

John_Preston #4 Posted 10 January 2014 - 03:51 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17436 battles
  • 6,373
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

View PostDarth_Woras, on 10 January 2014 - 03:42 PM, said:

I believe in your shelf.


But his lack of faith is somehow disturbing, isn't it?



1st_Flag_Gr #5 Posted 10 January 2014 - 09:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5024 battles
  • 27
  • [RATMA] RATMA
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011

View PostJohn_Preston, on 10 January 2014 - 03:18 PM, said:

It's because a newbie(sorry but that's th truth) with only 2k battles. You really have nothing to do in tierX battles. You are the kind of player who makes experienced players rage when they see you in their team. You spent money to rush all the way up to tierX when you have no idea how to play higher tiers? Well sir, it's is all your fault.

 

I just bought my first tierX after 8k battles and even i suck with it...i'm just about to reach average stats in my tierIX.

 

You should be at ~tier6 right now...even if you played the beta...the game changed a lot since then.


My friend my average expirience is 594 yours is 543 imagine that you are in clan so you battle very offen with platton that is very helpfull i play allong, you need 8000 battles to be les good than me that i have 2000 battles no matter how many battles you have you will be with les brain than me look your self at mirrow and say again that about noobies you sed also you dident understand even the post no matter how many years you will spend in battles no matter how many help you will have from your clan friends at plattons this is you have fun burnning your brain i am 35 years old skipper i have life i spend the money because i dont have that time goodnight my noobie friend i love you



misterslate #6 Posted 10 January 2014 - 09:50 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10900 battles
  • 1,502
  • Member since:
    02-01-2012

Your shelf has life?

 

Wasn't Skipper a kangaroo?


Edited by misterslate, 10 January 2014 - 09:50 PM.


John_Preston #7 Posted 10 January 2014 - 09:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17436 battles
  • 6,373
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

My average exp is mostly non-premium(more than 7000 battles without premium).

But if you want to b.tching about stats, just look at the other stats, not the only one where you are "better".

You see, my average tier is 2 less than yours, still we have almost the same damage/battle. How about that?

 

I never said that i'm a good player or that i'm better than you, so it's kinda pointless to compare our stats. I just said that you should not play in higher tiers yet.

Your real life is irrelevant here, you simply do not have enough experience in this game to play tierX.



Darth_Woras #8 Posted 10 January 2014 - 11:18 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 62 battles
  • 2,878
  • [HOI] HOI
  • Member since:
    04-04-2013
He is a wallet warrior, broken ynglisz, whiner - what could possibly go wrong :D

DD_Zooly #9 Posted 11 January 2014 - 12:21 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 11829 battles
  • 641
  • Member since:
    07-30-2010

The farce is stronk with this one.

 



punishersal #10 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:27 AM

    Mēneša cilvēks, marts 2012

  • Player
  • 17698 battles
  • 2,627
  • Member since:
    07-21-2011

View PostDD_Zooly, on 11 January 2014 - 01:21 AM, said:

The farce is stronk with this one.

 

engrish and glammar stronk too


Edited by punishersal, 11 January 2014 - 02:28 AM.


Effing_Drako #11 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:29 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25489 battles
  • 7,619
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

Thread nr 999999999 to be closed soon in the meanwhile



punishersal #12 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:35 AM

    Mēneša cilvēks, marts 2012

  • Player
  • 17698 battles
  • 2,627
  • Member since:
    07-21-2011

View Postdrakozaurs, on 11 January 2014 - 03:29 AM, said:

Thread nr 999999999 to be closed soon in the meanwhile

wow, wow, wow, lets not skip numbers. Last time I saw that sentence it was still on 2xxxxxxx something.



Effing_Drako #13 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:40 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25489 battles
  • 7,619
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

View Postpunishersal, on 11 January 2014 - 01:35 AM, said:

wow, wow, wow, lets not skip numbers. Last time I saw that sentence it was still on 2xxxxxxx something.

Ugh cant be bothered to change it now



1st_Flag_Gr #14 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:46 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5024 battles
  • 27
  • [RATMA] RATMA
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011
Sorry for my English i like Greek much more you see it is so rich language that one life is not enough to learn it all and because it seems you dont understad what i am saying i will try again. I say that if the team was not only by tier matched but also by experience you would have a nice balance battle ok people if you dont like this i respect your opinion respect mine.

Effing_Drako #15 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:49 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25489 battles
  • 7,619
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

Thats why its called a RANDOM battle where they are RANDOM 

Oxford dictionary

adjective

  • 1made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision:apparently random violence
  •  Statistics governed by or involving equal chances for each item:a random sample of 100 households
  •  (of masonry) with stones of irregular size and shape.
  • 2 informal odd, unusual, or unexpected:the class was hard but he was so random that it was always fun


1st_Flag_Gr #16 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:52 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5024 battles
  • 27
  • [RATMA] RATMA
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011

View Postdrakozaurs, on 11 January 2014 - 02:49 AM, said:

Thats why its called a RANDOM battle where they are RANDOM 

Oxford dictionary

adjective

  • 1made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision:apparently random violence
  •  Statistics governed by or involving equal chances for each item:a random sample of 100 households
  •  (of masonry) with stones of irregular size and shape.
  • 2 informal odd, unusual, or unexpected:the class was hard but he was so random that it was always fun

Really and the random of the oxford does not get the tier?



Effing_Drako #17 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:54 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25489 battles
  • 7,619
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011
The oxford isnt based on WOT

1st_Flag_Gr #18 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:57 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5024 battles
  • 27
  • [RATMA] RATMA
  • Member since:
    02-11-2011
Αρκετα μιλησα με παιδακια μαλλον σας εθιξα τον εγωισμο καλη διασκεδαση.

punishersal #19 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:59 AM

    Mēneša cilvēks, marts 2012

  • Player
  • 17698 battles
  • 2,627
  • Member since:
    07-21-2011

The thing is, its random battles. You cant expect much of teamwork in them because, as said its random. Most people even probably dont understand other languages than their own, but they are in same team.

Also, like above mentioned, 2k battles is still kinda "a bit too little" for Tier 10 tank. No matter how high average XP is, expierence in higher tiers has lot of matter. 

I see you have played only USSR tanks, so you havent expierenced how other nation tanks act and how they play on your own skin and that, in my opinion, is important too.


Edited by punishersal, 11 January 2014 - 03:01 AM.


Effing_Drako #20 Posted 11 January 2014 - 02:59 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25489 battles
  • 7,619
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

View Post1st_Flag_Gr, on 11 January 2014 - 01:57 AM, said:

Αρκετα μιλησα με παιδακια μαλλον σας εθιξα τον εγωισμο καλη διασκεδαση.

Im not talking childishly just explaning that RANDOMS are RANDOM






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users