Jump to content


If you were in World War 2


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
64 replies to this topic

saxsan4 #1 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:18 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18845 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

Hi, if you were a tank that fought in world war Two what would u be?

 

I would be a Matila II against the Italians :trollface:


Edited by saxsan4, 09 February 2014 - 09:45 AM.


KptStrzyga #2 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:24 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33333 battles
  • 15,649
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2011
The one opening parade in Berlin in `45.

Alteisen #3 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16738 battles
  • 1,292
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010

View Postsaxsan4, on 09 February 2014 - 08:18 AM, said:

Hi, if you were a tank that fought in world war Two what would u be?

 

I would be a Matila

The Germans described the Matilda as a tank that was easily surrounded and shot up from all sides. Are you sure you want to be a tank that is even less armed than a Panzer 1 (Matilda has one machine gun, Panzer 1 has two machine guns)?

 

 



Visionx_LV #4 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34971 battles
  • 632
  • Member since:
    02-24-2013
None, i would run form war as far I can. 

Meneldur #5 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:30 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 29989 battles
  • 397
  • Member since:
    07-17-2010
I would be a Maus. So I wouldn't be finished in time to fight and would be transported into the glorious Soviet Union and could sit all day long in Kubinka. :bajan:

Harabeishio #6 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:33 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 76 battles
  • 569
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012

View PostAlteisen, on 09 February 2014 - 09:25 AM, said:

The Germans described the Matilda as a tank that was easily surrounded and shot up from all sides. Are you sure you want to be a tank that is even less armed than a Panzer 1 (Matilda has one machine gun, Panzer 1 has two machine guns)?

 

 

 

Wait didnt the matilda have a 2 pounder?



Harabeishio #7 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:34 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 76 battles
  • 569
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012

View PostVisionx_LV, on 09 February 2014 - 09:26 AM, said:

None, i would run form war as far I can. 

 

So, A french tank then.

 

ZING!



Weihrauchhw95 #8 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:34 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9252 battles
  • 266
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013
Panther - Just about the best balance of firepower, armour and mobility. perfect just like me lol :tongue:

Harabeishio #9 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:36 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 76 battles
  • 569
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012

I would be THAT one tank that was ready before the end of the war, but never made it into the battlefields, because it's tardy.

Like the T-44 or the Perching



Weihrauchhw95 #10 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:38 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9252 battles
  • 266
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013

View PostHarabeishio, on 09 February 2014 - 09:33 AM, said:

 

Wait didnt the matilda have a 2 pounder?

 

matilda 1 had a vickers machine gun ... matilda 2 had the 2pdr



radd666 #11 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:39 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19284 battles
  • 2,498
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012
I would most likely be a Super-Nova. You know, to erase mankind and hopefully bring a new dawn for good people to ''rule'', rather than to watch the war from such a decadent metal machine such as a tank.:trollface:

saxsan4 #12 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:45 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18845 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostAlteisen, on 09 February 2014 - 08:25 AM, said:

The Germans described the Matilda as a tank that was easily surrounded and shot up from all sides. Are you sure you want to be a tank that is even less armed than a Panzer 1 (Matilda has one machine gun, Panzer 1 has two machine guns)?

 

 

Matilda II



saxsan4 #13 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:46 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18845 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostHarabeishio, on 09 February 2014 - 08:36 AM, said:

I would be THAT one tank that was ready before the end of the war, but never made it into the battlefields, because it's tardy.

Like the T-44 or the Perching

pershing did fight in the war



Justin666 #14 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:48 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15970 battles
  • 323
  • Member since:
    04-16-2012
I would be the Ferdinand has i had a higher chance of breaking down than getting killed due to enemy fire.. that way when the Russians come in the distance i can just douse my self with petrol, Jump out and pretend to be a Balrog from lord of the rings and wait for my gandulf

Justin666 #15 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:49 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15970 battles
  • 323
  • Member since:
    04-16-2012

View Postsaxsan4, on 09 February 2014 - 09:46 AM, said:

pershing did fight in the war

I heard only two got to the war in time?



saxsan4 #16 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:49 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18845 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostJustin666, on 09 February 2014 - 08:48 AM, said:

I would be the Ferdinand has i had a higher chance of breaking down than getting killed due to enemy fire.. that way when the Russians come in the distance i can just douse my self with petrol, Jump out and pretend to be a Balrog from lord of the rings and wait for my gandulf

Elephants were awful as they didnt have a machine gun so the Germans would get an MP 40 and fire down the barrel



saxsan4 #17 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:52 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18845 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostJustin666, on 09 February 2014 - 08:49 AM, said:

I heard only two got to the war in time?

20 pershings fought in WW2



Justin666 #18 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:52 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15970 battles
  • 323
  • Member since:
    04-16-2012

View Postsaxsan4, on 09 February 2014 - 09:49 AM, said:

Elephants were awful as they didnt have a machine gun so the Germans would get an MP 40 and fire down the barrel

The Elephants had a machine gun.. it was the ferdi that lacked any which made it even more embarrassing when a Elephant fell



saxsan4 #19 Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:57 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18845 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostJustin666, on 09 February 2014 - 08:52 AM, said:

The Elephants had a machine gun.. it was the ferdi that lacked any which made it even more embarrassing when a Elephant fell

ah ok



Visionx_LV #20 Posted 09 February 2014 - 10:00 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34971 battles
  • 632
  • Member since:
    02-24-2013

View PostHarabeishio, on 09 February 2014 - 08:34 AM, said:

 

So, A french tank then.

 

ZING!

Why French tanks should had rearview mirrors - To see the battle ;D


Edited by Visionx_LV, 09 February 2014 - 10:00 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users