

Video: The Science of Victory
#2 Posted 27 February 2014 - 06:17 PM
Wait, what? How did this even get past the quality check?
1. Sidescraping = revealing your front?
2. The tanks with poor hull armour are suddenly not "worth it", but the IS-3 still gets the mark of recommendation?
2.1. Caernavernorororon has a weak turret roof but IS-3 hasn't?
3. IS-6 has just as good hull as IS-3. Really?
I agree that the IS-3 is best suited for Team Battles mainly due to it being a jack of all trades, but if you are going to compare it to other tanks, at least use the same criteria!
#3 Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:37 PM
is3 is extremely easy penetrated from middle hull weakspot, even from side (110 is much better at this point)
i use T34 and am pretty satisfied with it...
is3 is good but need suport of some real heavy (tank or even td is good, i like t28 prot)
Edited by vifonSVK, 27 February 2014 - 07:40 PM.
#4 Posted 28 February 2014 - 09:20 AM
Its an absolutely correct video but somwhere deep inside there is a truth. And its saddening.
The IS-6 worst premium tanks, and the 112, FCM50t same.
Example with the IS-6:
Damage per minute the biggest lieing ever, becouse the IS-6 CANT PENETRATE tier 8 enemies with face-to-face.
If you cannot get close, and hit their side, you have no chance. And the maps 70% such.
You CAN EARN credit (40-60 or sometime more) becouse can hit and kill the lower tiers, but most of time the play not fun.
Its a truth.
#5 Posted 28 February 2014 - 01:42 PM
#6 Posted 06 March 2014 - 05:50 PM
Hi everybody ,
pls what is the music used as a background in the Science of Victory series? The name, artist, or when I can find it . Thx a lot
.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users