5 replies to this topic

[Community]

Our video series of tips and tactics for Team Battle continues.

Full news text

[Kartoffelmos]

Wait, what? How did this even get past the quality check?

1. Sidescraping = revealing your front?

2. The tanks with poor hull armour are suddenly not "worth it", but the IS-3 still gets the mark of recommendation?

2.1. Caernavernorororon has a weak turret roof but IS-3 hasn't?

3. IS-6 has just as good hull as IS-3. Really?

 

I agree that the IS-3 is best suited for Team Battles mainly due to it being a jack of all trades, but if you are going to compare it to other tanks, at least use the same criteria!

[vifonSVK]

is3 is extremely easy penetrated from middle hull weakspot, even from side (110 is much better at this point)

i use T34 and am pretty satisfied with it... 

is3 is good but need suport of some real heavy (tank or even td is good, i like t28 prot)

Edited by vifonSVK, 27 February 2014 - 07:40 PM.

[ColdWarior]

Its an absolutely correct video but somwhere deep inside there is a truth. And its saddening.

The IS-6 worst premium tanks, and the 112, FCM50t same.

Example with the IS-6:

Damage per minute the biggest lieing ever, becouse the IS-6 CANT PENETRATE tier 8 enemies with face-to-face.

If you cannot get close, and hit their side, you have no chance. And the maps 70% such.

You CAN EARN credit (40-60 or sometime more) becouse can hit and kill the lower tiers, but most of time the play not fun.

Its a truth.

[kuso]

Watching a vidio like this just makes me want Wargaming to ballance team battle ever more so every tank is worth useing else they should not even let them enter the god damm gamemode :p if they want it to be competetive

[snowfox13]

Hi everybody ,

pls what is the music used as a background in the Science of Victory series? The name, artist, or when I can find it . Thx a lot .