Jump to content


please END the campers medal

medal campers camping badplayer

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
53 replies to this topic

MauDaFOCA #1 Posted 28 February 2014 - 06:18 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 34223 battles
  • 117
  • [POR-1] POR-1
  • Member since:
    12-07-2012

Hello

 

Had a camper in my team, just one this time ;) and after the end of batle, I went to see his stats...

 

he has 5 medals of invincible, for surviving with zero damage suffered...

 

Of course he will have zero damage, he is camping in a bush, hoping for the team to win... and he's NOT HELPING THE TEAM.

 

Plays like this should lead to ban, not to medal...

 

So please finish that medal, end it.

 

I believe all good player dislike campers, so who agrees with me?

 

Regards

 

Mau

 


Edited by MauDaFOCA, 28 February 2014 - 06:19 PM.


KptStrzyga #2 Posted 28 February 2014 - 06:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33333 battles
  • 15,649
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2011

He no skaut, he camp bush?

Replay?



NLForTheBest #3 Posted 28 February 2014 - 06:46 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18000 battles
  • 212
  • [BADGE] BADGE
  • Member since:
    10-02-2012

unfair plane!

 



Jean_Bart #4 Posted 28 February 2014 - 07:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9185 battles
  • 435
  • Member since:
    02-13-2013

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 28 February 2014 - 05:18 PM, said:

Hello

 

Had a camper in my team, just one this time ;) and after the end of batle, I went to see his stats...

 

he has 5 medals of invincible, for surviving with zero damage suffered...

 

Of course he will have zero damage, he is camping in a bush, hoping for the team to win... and he's NOT HELPING THE TEAM.

 

Plays like this should lead to ban, not to medal...

I have also notticed this - players with tremendously bad performance and WR%, may have not even one Top Gun but they often have Invincible, Raider and sometimes Survivor!

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 28 February 2014 - 05:18 PM, said:

I believe all good player dislike campers, so who agrees with me?

I fully agree with you :honoring:!

Players with 1000+ battles and WR<40% = BAN!

Players with 1000+ battles and kill/death or damage dealt/recieved <0,5 = BAN!

WG can clean the game of all these griefers and botters in a matter of minutes, but i assume they think that their game is a "masterpiece":trollface: which is "working as intended" :angry:!

In fact, this game is mediocre at best and with every update it is not getting any better, because WG doesn't adress the real problems and flaws in game in any way :angry:!

 

 

 

PS negrep me more, i wish all the WR<40% tomatoes end up in the negreppers' teams.....ah wait... aren't they the same people :trollface::glasses:?!


Edited by Jean_Bart, 18 March 2014 - 06:46 PM.


_Antipathy #5 Posted 28 February 2014 - 09:39 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013
"Tactical camping"

StormimOn #6 Posted 28 February 2014 - 10:14 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 18777 battles
  • 460
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010
Wrong section, nothing to do with Wargaming Developer Partner Program ^^

CuteGargoyle #7 Posted 01 March 2014 - 12:04 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 18007 battles
  • 2,005
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
Could this camper possibly have been a bot?

Crasharr #8 Posted 01 March 2014 - 07:45 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16672 battles
  • 155
  • [DGAH] DGAH
  • Member since:
    07-31-2013

Look at this battle result and this is NOT worth a medal.... Why oh why not, 10k damage potential received should be worth something!

 

edit: hmm cant upload the screen shot, oh well i thought it was remarkable getting 10,5k potential damage received in a churchil VII

Edited by Crasharr, 01 March 2014 - 09:45 AM.


We_Just_Dinged_Em #9 Posted 01 March 2014 - 09:20 AM

    Captain

  • Clan Commander
  • 17559 battles
  • 2,011
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-12-2010

I have 10 invincible medals...and raider!:trollface:

 

Hope to get survivor one day



Fish__Food #10 Posted 01 March 2014 - 10:08 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 5084 battles
  • 2,521
  • Member since:
    12-15-2012
Invincible counts your streak so 5 survived and I have it, got steel wall twice in that 5 run. Bet you can never guess what tank I used? :bush:

satarica #11 Posted 01 March 2014 - 10:31 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 75499 battles
  • 419
  • [CT] CT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2011
invincible medal is stupidest medal in wot and i agree it should be removed no doubt about it.this is only medal that i feel ashamed about and i never tried to earn it i did it with ferdinand and i have no idea how i did this bcs i have never played ferdi from far behind...yes i wasnt on first line but never on last too,even if i wanted to be there on first line u just cant bcs ferdi is not fast enough :)

Oghmanas #12 Posted 01 March 2014 - 10:38 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13605 battles
  • 296
  • Member since:
    03-20-2011

No, "Invincible" is not a medal. It's an honorary rank, as it's called, and it's much like sharpshooter or the master gunner achievements. And he did not receive it five times, it simply counts how many battles in a row the player has survived without taking damage. 5 battles is the bare minimum you have to survive to get this rank. And it's not that hard to achieve it either, especially in tier I battles sitting in a bush with binocs. You can get this achievement by camping and being useful!

:smile:

 

 



Fawltyturrets #13 Posted 01 March 2014 - 10:49 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28701 battles
  • 304
  • Member since:
    02-28-2012

Achievements and awards or just personal they have no bearing on the game, but they do need an overhaul so you earn more experience and or credits for actual team play there's no encouragement to help which is a bit strange in a team based game.

 

Every award is only for what you do personally it just encourages selfish play like the rush to get top gun, even confederate is for you to hit more tanks than anyone else even though it seems on paper a team medal it's not. Capping's another you get more points if you get 75% of the cap and I've seen players kill team mates to get it!



Jean_Bart #14 Posted 01 March 2014 - 04:24 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9185 battles
  • 435
  • Member since:
    02-13-2013

View PostCuteGargoyle, on 28 February 2014 - 11:04 PM, said:

Could this camper possibly have been a bot?

Unfortunately most players (including WG) cannot realise (or just deny) that! That's why they negrep me so much :glasses:!

View Post_Antipathy, on 28 February 2014 - 08:39 PM, said:

"Tactical camping"

It could be tactical only if it actually served some purpose and aimed at some goal, different than just providing free kills and experience for the enemy!



_Antipathy #15 Posted 01 March 2014 - 04:31 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View PostJean_Bart, on 01 March 2014 - 03:24 PM, said:

Unfortunately most players (including WG) cannot realise (or just deny) that! That's why they negrep me so much :glasses:!

It could be tactical only if it actually served some purpose and aimed at some goal, different than just providing free kills and experience for the enemy!

 

Let's wait for them instead :popcorn:



Belizarius #16 Posted 01 March 2014 - 04:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15787 battles
  • 1,377
  • Member since:
    04-25-2011
I kemped bush in my  Obj. 268 on Komarerin, and had 6.2k spotting demej. Only did 3000 direct demej because dey nerf gun :sads:

Lord_Percy_Percy #17 Posted 01 March 2014 - 07:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14534 battles
  • 699
  • Member since:
    01-04-2014

View PostJean_Bart, on 28 February 2014 - 07:10 PM, said:

I have also notticed this - players with tremendously bad performance and WR%, may have not even one Top Gun but they often have Invincible, Raider and sometimes Survivor!

I fully agree with you :honoring:!

Players with 1000+ battles and WR<40% = BAN!

Players with 1000+ battles and kill/death or damage dealt/recieved <0,5 = BAN!

WG can clean the game of all these griefers and botters in a matter of minutes, but i assume they think that their game is a "masterpiece":trollface: which is "working as intended" :angry:!

In fact, this game is mediocre at best and with every update it is not getting any better, because WG doesn't adress the real problems and flaws in game in any way :angry:!

 

 

You really dont get it do you?

 

WG doesnt give a flying **** if you camp all battle long ,every battle, as long as you keep buying the gold. Thats all that matters, and thats all WG do this for.

 

The survival rate of this game is ONLY related to the revenue it collects and the profit margin it creates.

 

As soon as that drops below about 5%, the servers will be turned off and the devs re-employed elsewhere. And BIgBadVuk will have to find another job


Edited by Coeur_dlion, 01 March 2014 - 07:17 PM.


Etova_Kala #18 Posted 01 March 2014 - 07:31 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8568 battles
  • 451
  • Member since:
    05-24-2011
There should be some kind of limitation; either you do damage, spot for damage or at least have potential damage inflicted upon yourself (though this is a bit questionable if you ask me). Having zero in all three should negate the medal.

KptStrzyga #19 Posted 01 March 2014 - 07:43 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33333 battles
  • 15,649
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2011

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 28 February 2014 - 05:18 PM, said:

I believe all good player dislike campers, so who agrees with me?

Yes, true dat, but I`ve seen too many good scouts teamkilled for doing good job so I am sceptical. Too many players think that scouting is about driving around enemy tanks at full speed with both teams shooting at you. With view range 400 m and binos you can pretty much sit all game in one place and you will do exactly what scout is supposed to do. Unless you will get teamkilled by someone who can`t wait 30 secs for spot. 

There is "camping" and "camping". 

"AMX go spot". Yeah, right. Do it yourself or go to hell, I am not telling you how to play your tank, pls do same thing for me. I know my view range, my camo and I want to play game not suicide every 3 minutes.



System98 #20 Posted 01 March 2014 - 09:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 19408 battles
  • 1,355
  • Member since:
    12-02-2010

View PostWe_Just_Dinged_Em, on 01 March 2014 - 08:20 AM, said:

I have 10 invincible medals...and raider!:trollface:

 

Hope to get survivor one day

 

Want to trade a Raider for Survivor? :medal:







Also tagged with medal, campers, camping, badplayer

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users