Jump to content


M103

M103

  • Please log in to reply
147 replies to this topic

VauxhallZafira #141 Posted 09 April 2018 - 11:46 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8292 battles
  • 75
  • [1-EAD] 1-EAD
  • Member since:
    03-26-2013
The tank is great except for the massive weakspot on top of the turret which makes it hard to play any hull down.

benmeister #142 Posted 30 July 2018 - 07:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 23380 battles
  • 134
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011

View PostVauxhallZafira, on 09 April 2018 - 11:46 AM, said:

The tank is great except for the massive weakspot on top of the turret which makes it hard to play any hull down.

 

It also has an enormous turret area with no armor looking from the side. If you turn the turret the wrong way any tier 7 can get you from half way across the map. The only way to play it is like a TD, from longer range where people can't hit your roof easily and can't flank you. So a tier 9 HT that plays like a TD - pretty pathetic IMO.

Kubi2vin #143 Posted 11 November 2018 - 01:37 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11886 battles
  • 1,124
  • Member since:
    10-30-2011
I think M103 is not that bad but need a little buff. Why he only have -8 degree of depression with this big turret ? Its totally unlogical. Nowaday, all tanks have decent depression, for exemple new russian light with his -7 o_O
Seriously WG, how M103 limited to -8 and this have -7 ? Please, buff depression to -9 or -10 according to spirit of US heavy tank line.


_G_u_d_e_r_i_a_n_ #144 Posted 18 May 2019 - 06:06 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18511 battles
  • 1,436
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
any buff for this old crappy tank?

Rosetta_and_Philae #145 Posted 15 September 2019 - 02:17 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 54592 battles
  • 2,250
  • [WTF-X] WTF-X
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
Worst tier 9 heavy by a huge margin.

 



killer999death #146 Posted 24 September 2019 - 01:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27490 battles
  • 751
  • [JHS] JHS
  • Member since:
    06-25-2011

 

 

 

 

Tank is crap. No hull down. No sidescraping, No nothing. You'd think it's good at exposing only the turret but people pen you on the coupola or the upper part of the turret so [edited]every armor spot on this tank I guess.

 



chinchillah #147 Posted 25 September 2019 - 04:41 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30433 battles
  • 218
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

Never played the m103 but a friend of mine had really bad experience with that..

 

In my opinion t110e5 is still worth it. Especially if you play against newer players they will try to hit lower plate which is still pretty bouncy. If you go hulldown people are trying to hit your cupolar so bad that you can out dpm them quiet often while they are tunnel visioning and trying to hit that cupolar. If you move turret a lot and move back and forth it can be bit more difficult to hit it. 

 

Compared to conq. It sucks obv haha but still fun from time to time in randoms. 



Gatix #148 Posted 25 January 2020 - 12:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21149 battles
  • 93
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    09-12-2014
Marks of excellencer 3 stars I got. However this tank need buff, not that big. Gun is playable, would be nice dep -10. weakspots should be smaller as Tortoise got buff. Right now they are way too weak and big. To compare new tanks. WG has no time for old tanks, this actually is salty truth. 





Also tagged with M103

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users