Jump to content


Success in Team Battles


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
52 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 24,443
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Whether you are new to team battles or already have some experience, we have prepared a very useful guide to increase your chances in Team Battles.

Full news text

portuguese007 #2 Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:38 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27397 battles
  • 370
  • [INPUT] INPUT
  • Member since:
    06-28-2011
Thanks for the tips, now i can do team battles, i was so noob and losing 99% of them.

Ubertron_X #3 Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 30513 battles
  • 199
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

Why do the always miss the crucial advice in those guides?

 

"Never ever join a random team battle..."



Horcan #4 Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:18 PM

    The Great Hunter

  • Player
  • 57021 battles
  • 387
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Good you posted this, but i doubt it will make the autosearch for team usable.Maybe if you make a pop-up ingame , to link this to all those idiots joining team battles with tier 2-7.

WarDog_74 #5 Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 41086 battles
  • 7
  • [CARPI] CARPI
  • Member since:
    03-14-2013

i've got a question in my mind, maybe you can help me...! if 6 players had 8 tier tanks, and other two had tier 1, for that total of 42 points, why the tier 2 is not alloud, in teams with 7 players ...ONLY ?????.... it makes the same total of 42....?


Edited by StarWarDog, 26 March 2014 - 05:22 PM.


Jokru #6 Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16164 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    09-19-2011
I think jagdpanther 2 is better td for team battles. Armor, good gun and very fast. It's just more flexible td. But i still love my rhm :)   

Horcan #7 Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:37 PM

    The Great Hunter

  • Player
  • 57021 battles
  • 387
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011

View PostStarWarDog, on 26 March 2014 - 04:19 PM, said:

i've got a question in my mind, maybe you can help me...! if 6 players had 8 tier tanks, and other two had tier 1, for that total of 42 points, why the tier 2 is not alloud, in teams with 7 players ...ONLY ?????.... it makes the same total of 42....?

I think math beats you.and youre not making any sense anyway.

 

 

This system comes from ESL tournament , and is designed to allow 7 players with tier 6 tanks.7x6=42 . But the teams are allowed to set up their line-ups as they please.The best possible setup is 5 tier 8 plus 2 tier 1.

If for some reason , your team cant provide 7th player, you have to play with 6x6 .Which is 36 . This is why you cant play with 5 tier 8 and one tier 2.It equals 41.Your tier 2 would easily kill those two tier 1 of the enemy, so thats why it is not allowed.

WG decided to allow teams of 5-6 players, but once you pick 5 tier 8 , you still have to use only tier 1 for the other two slots.

I hope you understand , if this was your question.


Edited by Horcan, 26 March 2014 - 05:45 PM.


MolochZ #8 Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:46 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16242 battles
  • 1,007
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011

View PostStarWarDog, on 26 March 2014 - 04:19 PM, said:

i've got a question in my mind, maybe you can help me...! if 6 players had 8 tier tanks, and other two had tier 1, for that total of 42 points, why the tier 2 is not alloud, in teams with 7 players ...ONLY ?????.... it makes the same total of 42....?

 

I think you only have 41 points with 7 players and 40 points with 6. 

 

I'm not 100% sure of that as I don't play Team Battles much. Think I saw it in some YouTube video.



Liquiel #9 Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:12 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8730 battles
  • 47
  • [A-M-W] A-M-W
  • Member since:
    09-30-2011
Locked(unused) slots count as a tier 1 tank.

Edited by Liquiel, 26 March 2014 - 06:12 PM.


VeryRisky #10 Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:13 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 17107 battles
  • 8,522
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

The mode if fun at times but as the article states there are only 12 tanks recommended for it, which shows just how narrow it is.  WG have designed the game mode and the interface, but it would work just as well for 7x46 or 7x39-limitT7 and allow us a change from the same old tanks.

 

The vast majority of WoT players will never play and ESL battle, so tying the fomat to the ESL permenanty does seem to be rather ignoring the bulk of your customers.  I'd love it if you would change the points and tier limits every few months.  You have a game with a couple of hundered tanks and this game mode is for 12 of them!  Seems a waste of potential.



saxsan4 #11 Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:36 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18840 battles
  • 3,496
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

Caernarvon  is all round better than T32.

 


Edited by saxsan4, 26 March 2014 - 06:37 PM.


mrtvimarijan #12 Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 36809 battles
  • 898
  • [PXA] PXA
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

View PostVeryRisky, on 26 March 2014 - 05:13 PM, said:

You have a game with a couple of hundered tanks and this game mode is for 12 of them!  Seems a waste of potential.

 

In addition with very few maps it leads to very predictable tactics and repetition = boooooooooooring gameplay



TheLuchsKing #13 Posted 26 March 2014 - 07:06 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17348 battles
  • 202
  • [C-Y-A] C-Y-A
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

The worst article I have ever read.


Edited by TheLuchsKing, 26 March 2014 - 07:07 PM.


Effing_Drako #14 Posted 26 March 2014 - 07:41 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25240 battles
  • 7,545
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

View PostJokru, on 26 March 2014 - 04:21 PM, said:

I think jagdpanther 2 is better td for team battles. Armor, good gun and very fast. It's just more flexible td. But i still love my rhm :)   

Beating 3 IS3's all alone never gets old


Edited by drakozaurs, 26 March 2014 - 07:50 PM.


0x001B #15 Posted 26 March 2014 - 08:15 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 10379 battles
  • 95
  • Member since:
    10-08-2010

View PostHorcan, on 26 March 2014 - 05:18 PM, said:

Good you posted this, but i doubt it will make the autosearch for team usable.Maybe if you make a pop-up ingame , to link this to all those idiots joining team battles with tier 2-7.

 

This begs the question why they allowed tiers II to VII in team battles in the first place?

 

Perhaps the best option would be to simply disable them, since they are useless anyway, and force players to use tiers I and VIII exclusively with the next update?



charns #16 Posted 26 March 2014 - 08:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16607 battles
  • 873
  • Member since:
    07-12-2012
Why the need for an article about that mode ? could it be that it is not popular at all ? I wonder why...

RegularLogic #17 Posted 26 March 2014 - 08:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 38130 battles
  • 977
  • Member since:
    01-26-2011

View Postsaxsan4, on 26 March 2014 - 05:36 PM, said:

Caernarvon  is all round better than T32.

 


Thats what people without the T32 say.



oglop #18 Posted 26 March 2014 - 10:18 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19794 battles
  • 422
  • [ANV-V] ANV-V
  • Member since:
    05-15-2012

View Postsaxsan4, on 26 March 2014 - 06:36 PM, said:

Caernarvon  is all round better than T32.

 


Great advice from 500 WN8 tomato :) => more caerns more pray



Predator_or #19 Posted 26 March 2014 - 10:43 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59044 battles
  • 1,372
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011

View Postsaxsan4, on 26 March 2014 - 06:36 PM, said:

Caernarvon  is all round better than T32.

 


Can you tell me, why it is better than T32?



ARES_IV #20 Posted 26 March 2014 - 10:51 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15621 battles
  • 1,753
  • [H-O-T] H-O-T
  • Member since:
    05-18-2013

View Postmishatopola, on 26 March 2014 - 10:43 PM, said:


Can you tell me, why it is better than T32?

 

It might make the enemy team die from laughing.... :trollface:






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users