Jump to content


9.0 T-54 nerf - share your opinions

T-54 nerf 9.0 medium Soviet U.S.S.R

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
120 replies to this topic

Poll: T-54 nerf. (259 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Is the armour un-balanced?

  1. Hell ye! (72 votes [27.80%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.80%

  2. Not really.. it's good, but not OP. (154 votes [59.46%])

    Percentage of vote: 59.46%

  3. Not at all, its swiss cheese! (33 votes [12.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.74%

Should the HEAT ammunition be nerfed?

  1. YES! (149 votes [57.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.53%

  2. No! (110 votes [42.47%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.47%

Which part of the T-54 should be nerfed? (if any)

  1. The armour. (53 votes [15.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.45%

  2. The gun. (14 votes [4.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.08%

  3. The speed (16 votes [4.66%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.66%

  4. The HEAT ammo. (123 votes [35.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.86%

  5. The mobility. (20 votes [5.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.83%

  6. Nothing, it's fine as it is. (117 votes [34.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 34.11%

Will 9.0 bring the glory days of the T-54 to an end?

  1. No, it will still be perfection. <3 (72 votes [27.80%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.80%

  2. Meh, it will be different, but it will still do the job. (138 votes [53.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.28%

  3. Yes, goodbye old friend. </3 (49 votes [18.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.92%

Vote Hide poll

Keyhand #41 Posted 11 April 2014 - 07:46 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 63628 battles
  • 6,050
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011

View Postlazydot, on 30 March 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:


BTW, if its "statpadding" tank, go play 100 battles in it, statpad yourself and tell us about your findings. Funny to read this dumb BS over and over from guys, who doesn't even own the tank they are bitching about. Sorry for being personal here, but you are one of these Id*ts and well deserve it.

 

Ok, have someone who played the tank call it a statspadding machine :P

And while we are at it, my beloved unicorn, the other tier 9 med is OP as well, but only looky no touchy here, please, until i have finished grinding :veryhappy:



skileskale #42 Posted 12 April 2014 - 10:21 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29210 battles
  • 94
  • [HSOP] HSOP
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010

View PostDeathcon1998, on 28 March 2014 - 06:57 PM, said:

that looks like a decently large shell.. may I ask what shot at this unfortunate T-54?;P

It read in the infopanel, that the number 9 hit was from a T-55´s 100mm cannons HEAT round, number 1´s are penetrating hits from the same gun but with AP shells, number 2 is ricocheting hit with the same AP round and number 3 is a hit from a RPG.

This turret is at a display in Parola tank museum, Finland.



kyozu #43 Posted 13 April 2014 - 08:49 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 17203 battles
  • 887
  • Member since:
    11-27-2010

What nerf?

 



Primal_Chaos #44 Posted 13 April 2014 - 01:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9525 battles
  • 282
  • [ACA] ACA
  • Member since:
    09-04-2011
He plays amazingly good, but in that match was also loads of luck and HEAT...

Exozen #45 Posted 14 April 2014 - 11:12 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31666 battles
  • 1,079
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011
All this yawning for THAT little turret armor nerf ? Its was strong as hell before , now it will be strong as heaven. 

DragfestE #46 Posted 16 April 2014 - 06:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6593 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012
So how is the T-54 now?

ch4br4 #47 Posted 16 April 2014 - 08:12 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13026 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    02-14-2011

Tanks like AMX 13 90, T69, T-44 penetrated my hull frontally multiple times today. In 8.11 it was nearly impossible for them without gold ammo. And JPanther penetreted my cheeks. So armor is much worse right now. Moreover hull is much higher and lower plate is 2 times bigger.

 

 



madman2711 #48 Posted 18 April 2014 - 05:37 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 32104 battles
  • 42
  • [DACII] DACII
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013
I still like it but truth to be said indeed i got penned by almost anyone Also in my cent 1 i got penned in the mantlet so i think that they nerfed armour and i penned a t34 turret from the front in my is-7

Soppatykki #49 Posted 18 April 2014 - 09:47 AM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 29258 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    11-29-2010

T-54 was one of the most OP tank in the game, it desperately needed nerf. Thank WG that it finally get some, probably not enough thought, but at least some. A well played T-54 could rape everything, it was just ridiculously OP.

 



rikkelt #50 Posted 18 April 2014 - 11:22 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17506 battles
  • 1,184
  • [ZIU] ZIU
  • Member since:
    03-23-2013

It's funny that the turret gets nerfed a bit and the next day all scrubs are whining that they got penetrated in their hull.

 



Primal_Chaos #51 Posted 18 April 2014 - 12:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9525 battles
  • 282
  • [ACA] ACA
  • Member since:
    09-04-2011

View Postrikkelt, on 18 April 2014 - 12:22 PM, said:

It's funny that the turret gets nerfed a bit and the next day all scrubs are whining that they got penetrated in their hull.

 


 I didn´t check the exact armour schemes, but I think the lower FP got much bigger. This could be the main reason people complain.



madman2711 #52 Posted 18 April 2014 - 07:25 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 32104 battles
  • 42
  • [DACII] DACII
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013

View PostSoppatykki, on 18 April 2014 - 10:47 AM, said:

T-54 was one of the most OP tank in the game, it desperately needed nerf. Thank WG that it finally get some, probably not enough thought, but at least some. A well played T-54 could rape everything, it was just ridiculously OP.

 

Have u played it or just from what u have met belive its op 

 

That is like me complaining that fvb183/foch155/ wtf are Op although i never played them except on the test server 

 

 

i see more of those idiots with camping Tds in base then a t-54 that runs and kills 1/2 the enemy team 

 

except for some rare cases i dont meet more then 2 t-54 per game but those game braking tds are omnipresent 



Soppie #53 Posted 18 April 2014 - 08:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19053 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    08-02-2011
i cant believe ppl are crying about the t54 gold ammo, while the wz120 has 340 pen and more dmg!

NiemandXL #54 Posted 19 April 2014 - 03:12 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37955 battles
  • 2,934
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013
All tanks that get a HD model seem to have their turret armor nerfed. And I see great balancing issues arise from that as nerfing the little useful armor (only armor that has a decent chance to stop gold ammo is of any real use in WOT) most tanks have will be a HUGE buff for gold spamming paper-noobloader!!!

madman2711 #55 Posted 19 April 2014 - 05:48 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 32104 battles
  • 42
  • [DACII] DACII
  • Member since:
    03-08-2013
Also nobody cries about obj 416 that has the same stats as t-54 top gun one tier below Also type 61 and leo pta have same gold pen

Charcharo #56 Posted 19 April 2014 - 07:59 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 30674 battles
  • 1,414
  • [-BAE-] -BAE-
  • Member since:
    09-16-2010

View Postmadman2711, on 19 April 2014 - 07:48 AM, said:

Also nobody cries about obj 416 that has the same stats as t-54 top gun one tier below Also type 61 and leo pta have same gold pen

 

416 also has no gun depression, no armour (even on turret) a limited arc and is slightly slower then T-54.

Leo PTA already has monster penetration and not as good DPM, it gains nothing from gold rounds. Same for 61 and WZ 120. Only T-54 gets a substantial upgrade. Well, that and E 50, but its German so people never whine about it....
 



Fryers #57 Posted 20 April 2014 - 03:56 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9458 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    11-03-2012

Armour nerf? I never knew it got one and it held up rather well for me.

 



Exozen #58 Posted 20 April 2014 - 07:42 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31666 battles
  • 1,079
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011

View PostSoppie, on 18 April 2014 - 08:51 PM, said:

i cant believe ppl are crying about the t54 gold ammo, while the wz120 has 340 pen and more dmg!

 

+ No gun depression , bad gun overall with poor accuarcy and aimtime, its called the derp gun of mediums for a reason. 

 

 



Variente #59 Posted 23 April 2014 - 12:08 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12975 battles
  • 32
  • Member since:
    05-08-2013
you cant say wz is more OP just because it has 10 more pen.... consider the fact that the wz's hull is weaker, but t54 only needs a gold nerf maybe an armour nerf to that of a wz 120, but it is easy to take out a t54 if the person driving it doesnt know how to play it, it was very amusing taking out a full hp t54 on an is 3 because he went on a brawl and could only shoot my turret while i had his sides.

SupremeNoob #60 Posted 25 April 2014 - 07:28 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 41513 battles
  • 816
  • Member since:
    07-23-2012

Mostly agenda driven crap in this thread.

The T54 I drive is always Tier 9 and 10 matches.

It always faces doom cannons that can one shot it.... I cant even recall

a game when I was top tier. Yes Ive had them but they are so

few and far between.

 

I can kill a T54 with my KV5 - and for the record the effort to kill a Type 59,

still the most OP med in the game takes as much effort as it does a T54.

Both are very difficult to kill, but I can do it. But theres absolutely nothing OP

about the T54 when its facing Tier 9 and 10...

 

 

 

 

 







Also tagged with T-54, nerf, 9.0, medium, Soviet, U.S.S.R

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users