Jump to content


T-34-3

T-34-3

  • Please log in to reply
589 replies to this topic

Alidore #41 Posted 13 June 2014 - 02:54 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10654 battles
  • 226
  • Member since:
    10-13-2013

TBH I like this tank. It has completely opposite values to my British mediums. Play it in different places.

I think I saw QB in a live stream raging at this tank, but, he took it exactly the places he took his usual Comet/Centurion. This tank doesn't go there. Drive this to places where you don't need gun depression, don't snipe, don't brawl, just mug em.:izmena:

And it's a good looking tank :smile:

 

I posted a replay in here of The Mugger on another thread, that's what it does best. It even scouts! Patrol duty:bush:



Eila_Juutilainen #42 Posted 13 June 2014 - 09:49 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21116 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

View PostAlidore, on 13 June 2014 - 03:54 AM, said:

 

I think I saw QB in a live stream raging at this tank, but, he took it exactly the places he took his usual Comet/Centurion. This tank doesn't go there.

 

I have the same issue with Jingles. When he was doing his STA-1 review, he came across a T-34-3 on the top of the hill in Prohkorovka (...did I spell that right?) and he said "here's your review of the T-34-3", after which he proceeded to wreck the utterly-disadvantaged tank, purely because the driver was an idiot who placed his tank in the worst position he could have been.



Heinkle #43 Posted 13 June 2014 - 11:15 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 15114 battles
  • 2,523
  • Member since:
    06-30-2011

View PostAlidore, on 13 June 2014 - 02:54 AM, said:

Drive this to places where you don't need gun depression

 

Where everyone can easily kill you.



Search_Warrant #44 Posted 15 June 2014 - 09:18 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27235 battles
  • 6,326
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostHeinkle, on 13 June 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

 

Where everyone can easily kill you.

there are dips in the ground that can hide hull while still being able to use that turret/gun.



Dragan_T #45 Posted 17 June 2014 - 03:46 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 46560 battles
  • 6
  • [MFURY] MFURY
  • Member since:
    08-30-2011

some of mine impressions are here

 

http://forum.worldof...56#entry8348856



Valvalecia #46 Posted 18 June 2014 - 01:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11685 battles
  • 1,404
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
It took me 1,4k xp to get ace on thing thing, (4k dmg,2k spot), just wow....

edit: Replay, if you're interested, link

Edited by Breitenfeld1631, 18 June 2014 - 02:24 PM.


Dragan_T #47 Posted 18 June 2014 - 02:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 46560 battles
  • 6
  • [MFURY] MFURY
  • Member since:
    08-30-2011

View PostBreitenfeld1631, on 18 June 2014 - 02:41 PM, said:

It took me 1,4k xp to get ace on thing thing, (4k dmg,2k spot), just wow....

edit: Replay, if you're interested, http://wotreplays.com/site/942761


Yes, I write about it. Was so surprised that I need more then 4k to get Ace. You have link in post just above yours. So tank can be really dangerous

 

Btw, good game man


Edited by Serbian_Soldier, 18 June 2014 - 02:46 PM.


xidex #48 Posted 18 June 2014 - 10:26 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31890 battles
  • 80
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

View PostSerbian_Soldier, on 18 June 2014 - 02:19 PM, said:


Yes, I write about it. Was so surprised that I need more then 4k to get Ace. You have link in post just above yours. So tank can be really dangerous

 

Btw, good game man

AFAIK badges are given by 7 days period of games played with that vehicle. So it may just be a good week. I had aces even with 1k or so.



Valvalecia #49 Posted 19 June 2014 - 12:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11685 battles
  • 1,404
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
As I've played more I've noticed that the ammo rack is just horrible on this thing. There's been multiple matches where I've gotten a damaged ammo rack twice and you won't do crap after that with your 24s reload time so you almost might as well suicide. 

Edited by Breitenfeld1631, 19 June 2014 - 12:41 PM.


Eila_Juutilainen #50 Posted 19 June 2014 - 12:44 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21116 battles
  • 3,883
  • [102ND] 102ND
  • Member since:
    11-04-2012

View Postxidex, on 18 June 2014 - 11:26 PM, said:

AFAIK badges are given by 7 days period of games played with that vehicle. So it may just be a good week. I had aces even with 1k or so.

 

Depending on the performance in the last 7 days is correct, yes. And it's also possible he just overshot the criteria by a mile :glasses:


Edited by Eila_Juutilainen, 19 June 2014 - 12:44 PM.


GuzganuRozaliu #51 Posted 20 June 2014 - 01:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32895 battles
  • 1,546
  • Member since:
    07-17-2013

My best game so far in the T-34-3 ( not the first Ace Tanker though ) : http://replays.quickybaby.com/result.php?id=18579

You really have to work hard to get a good result in it.

I still don't regret buying it, but I think 11k gold for no gun depression and no DpM is too much....

 

PS: the game was actually boring half of the time, but it's very unlikely to get dynamic games + good results with that DpM :amazed: 


Edited by GuzganuRozaliu, 20 June 2014 - 01:09 PM.


eatmyheat #52 Posted 22 June 2014 - 04:15 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 197 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    06-20-2014

buffing gun depression would be wrong cuz its chinese as it is but

accuracy 0,46 -> 0,42

aiming time 3,4 -> 3,2

rate of fire 4.17 -> 4.55 (like on 112) or* little buff on hidden ground resistance stats (they are same like on the Type59, but T-34-3 has lower weight.)

would be fair to this tank

and then a very small cammo value buff on T-34-2 (enough, facing T10 tanks is actually something good for the 34-2)

and everyone is happy... at least i would be :)

 

 

*buffing both would result in facehugging platoons


Edited by eatmyheat, 22 June 2014 - 08:08 PM.


xidex #53 Posted 22 June 2014 - 07:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31890 battles
  • 80
  • Member since:
    02-18-2012

View Posteatmyheat, on 22 June 2014 - 04:15 PM, said:

aiming time 3,6 -> 3,4

aiming time is already 3,4. I dont know if there is anything except arty with 3,6 :D



eatmyheat #54 Posted 22 June 2014 - 08:09 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 197 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    06-20-2014

View Postxidex, on 22 June 2014 - 08:29 PM, said:

aiming time is already 3,4. I dont know if there is anything except arty with 3,6 :D

yeah thanks corrected :)



Mr_Yoshitome #55 Posted 17 July 2014 - 04:20 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 22486 battles
  • 62
  • Member since:
    03-01-2011

I tried this tank on test and liked, bought on live, but now I HATE this tank with a passion. Garbage gun, awful awful awful aim time and gun dispersion on move, tank is utterly crippled by lack of gun depression, it's just agony to play. For god's sake, don't buy it if you're thinking of it. I'm not a bad player by any means, but even when I try to play the tank in a way that allows for it's weaknesses, it's just agony. The OP's description of the accuracy is pretty true. What's weird is that this tank sprays shells any which way to the point where you might as well NOT aim, but IS6 / other russian tanks sigma accuracy seems much better despite having identical 'paper' gun accuracy stats.

 

I saw on FTR that it was getting a buff, and thought 'Ah well, maybe I should try it again' - played one game and raged so hard at it I very nearly just sold it for the credits, I am never going to play it again.



Valvalecia #56 Posted 17 July 2014 - 10:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11685 battles
  • 1,404
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
I just looked up the expected damage for this tank and found out that T-34-3 has it higher than Type 59 and on the same levels with other tanks of same tier.

Just what the [edited]....

btw only way to run this tank is with rammer,vstab,gld BIA and food and pray that you won't burn up.

GuzganuRozaliu #57 Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:08 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32895 battles
  • 1,546
  • Member since:
    07-17-2013

the gun is troll as [edited]

1. one time I carefully aim at the back of an IS-6 from 100 meters ( after I tried half a dozen shots at his full side from 150 meters with no pen )

I take the shot...

Aaaand I kill the ally IS who was facehugging the IS-6 :angry:

RnG decided that the tiny bit of ally LFP that was sticking out beneath was way more important than the IS-6 bum that was covering almost all my reticle...

 

2. but other time I pen a hull down Obj 430 II

with AP

from 200 meters !

on the move at 30 kph !!

twice !!! :veryhappy:


Edited by GuzganuRozaliu, 18 July 2014 - 07:11 AM.


Search_Warrant #58 Posted 18 July 2014 - 10:06 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27235 battles
  • 6,326
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

Main reason i quit china meds. i gave up on T34-1 because every hit damaged a main mod...1 shot fires 1 shot ammo hit and 1 shot something..SOMETHING broke. A-44 might have had frequent engine damage but i never set on fire as much as my T-34-1.

 

T-34-3 looks like the same kind of layout as previouse china mediums. not a good thing. tho if the price was right id be willing to give it a go. i do like peekaboom tanks.



Valvalecia #59 Posted 19 July 2014 - 12:24 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11685 battles
  • 1,404
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 19 July 2014 - 12:06 AM, said:

Main reason i quit china meds. i gave up on T34-1 because every hit damaged a main mod...1 shot fires 1 shot ammo hit and 1 shot something..SOMETHING broke. A-44 might have had frequent engine damage but i never set on fire as much as my T-34-1.

 

T-34-3 looks like the same kind of layout as previouse china mediums. not a good thing. tho if the price was right id be willing to give it a go. i do like peekaboom tanks.



Module/Crew damage is a major problem with this tank and one of the main reasons I hate it. You'll get frequent ammo rack & gunner/loader damage with this PoS.



Valvalecia #60 Posted 20 July 2014 - 12:10 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11685 battles
  • 1,404
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Spoiler


just gotta love this tenk <3







Also tagged with T-34-3

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users