Jump to content


Consideration for thousands of players!


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
5 replies to this topic

MadeOfSteel21 #1 Posted 01 April 2014 - 07:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5399 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    03-13-2013

I've heard that the WoT crew will make the game run easier for a lot of players (40 %) that have PCs under the minimum system requirements, but that isn't happening!

 

I've watched the video "Developer's Diary" which was saying something about those players.

 

So, all in all there is around 80,000,000 registered players, and if there is 32,000,000 (40 %) that have PCs under the base minimum system requirements, than i don't know how will those 32,000,000 players continue to play WoT if their game is running around 20 fps, on low settings!

 

I just want to know what will happen with that future theme. The guys from WoT crew told us that they will do something about it, but nothing was told on Developer's Diary.

 

Even I am running that game around 15 fps god dammit !!

They didn't consider that out there in the world are people who don't want to give a lot of money to build a new PC, or don't even want to give money on new PC!

 

And now, after all of those months of struggleing with bare 15-20 fps, they have to add in the game an HD Redesigned Tanks and Maps! OMG where is this world going to!

 

So, how they think that I'm going to enjoy this freakin' awesome game!!!

Well, I wouldn't mind if they send me a nice Alienware Desktop PC :) Than all of my tortures would be gone, and I would finally be reliefed, Hah, sweet imagination.

 

So, guys I hope you reply to me, so that we can make some nice conversation about this topic and maybe the gentlemen from WoT crew will at the end send me a nice Alienware! xD



Kalkalash #2 Posted 01 April 2014 - 07:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 23673 battles
  • 500
  • Member since:
    07-09-2010
It's not the devs' fault that people refuse to upgrade their machines. Time goes on, computers get old, they get upgraded. That's how it goes. If Wargaming wants World of Tanks to stay competitive, they'll have to upgrade the graphical side from time to time. 

Monster014 #3 Posted 01 April 2014 - 09:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6234 battles
  • 213
  • [LVPPD] LVPPD
  • Member since:
    01-12-2014

I'm runing test server (Whit HD Models) on 20 fps. i am geting only 15 fps on live.... 

 

But i am using 3% textures and some other tweaks to get my FPS up... and im geting anythink from 19-35 fps...

 

Gonna upgrade my PC in 6 month only :sad:



Andreas2202 #4 Posted 02 April 2014 - 01:12 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 459 battles
  • 2,091
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011
My record was 19fps, keeps going around 4-15fps :trollface:

GemmaLou #5 Posted 02 April 2014 - 01:38 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 8113 battles
  • 5,113
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

i'm playing on a laptop mum bought for me a couple of years ago to do school stuff on so it's not like super powerful or anything and i get ~35 fps mostly, it used to be loads worse, like 20 :o i can play with anything over 15 tho.

but you can turn off the hd stuff anyways.



MadeOfSteel21 #6 Posted 02 April 2014 - 01:48 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5399 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    03-13-2013

View PostKalkalash, on 01 April 2014 - 08:58 PM, said:

It's not the devs' fault that people refuse to upgrade their machines. Time goes on, computers get old, they get upgraded. That's how it goes. If Wargaming wants World of Tanks to stay competitive, they'll have to upgrade the graphical side from time to time. 

 

I understand all of that. But couldn't they just make more graphic options for those low-end PC players. An example, instead of 800x600 of minimum res, why don't they put the minimum to at least 640x480.

So the area of options would be greater, and everyone could enjoy.

Yes, they can continue upgrading graphics, but they could at the same time continue downgrading it, so that people with low-end PCs could choose 640x480 and people with high-end PCs could choose 1920x1080.

Everyone would be satisfied!






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users