Jump to content


Object 140

Object 140 140 T-54 T-55

  • Please log in to reply
150 replies to this topic

Shuko #21 Posted 29 July 2014 - 09:37 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 21983 battles
  • 483
  • [CARRY] CARRY
  • Member since:
    12-07-2010

View PostMarita, on 26 July 2014 - 05:16 PM, said:

How much average dmg is considered unicum level in this tonk guys?

 

I don't know about any "official" numbers, but 3k ave is a good start in any t10 med.



Defario #22 Posted 07 August 2014 - 08:50 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 11968 battles
  • 145
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013

View PostShuko, on 29 July 2014 - 10:37 PM, said:

 

I don't know about any "official" numbers, but 3k ave is a good start in any t10 med.


i have 2600 and i am at 2800 wn8 right now (yeah i know bad )

btw today i had this battle

http://wotreplays.co...ario-object_140



aronitupack #23 Posted 08 August 2014 - 07:34 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24634 battles
  • 7
  • [RATIO] RATIO
  • Member since:
    04-08-2013
My Obj 140 suffers Ammo Rack hits in 75% battles,even with Wet Ammo Rack and Safe Storage Perk.I had to sacrifice other equipment to use Wet Ammo Rack,but continues happening.In numbers,stock ammo rack hases 210 hit points,and with wet ammo rack + safe storeage perk is about 355,but isn´t near to be enough.Is really frustrating to play it some times,specially when use the repair kit to restore ammo rack and get ammo racked other more time in the same battle.Please,check it,maybe Wet Ammo Storage isn´t working with this tank.Thanks.

putos_opat_v_akci #24 Posted 08 August 2014 - 08:24 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26926 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PRASE] PRASE
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012

aronitupack: maybe you have an broken model, give the mechanic some vodka and he can fix the ammorack with hammer

ok, stop joking, I have the perk on loader and I dont get ammoracked so far (maybe I get, but dont remember it). Yeah, the ammorack is broken every 6th game, but is not that kind of a problem.

object is not a T-54, you have to play a bit less yolo, you have to use all the gun depression that you have and try to not get shot in the front/under the turret

 

what piss me a bit are the stupid fuel tanks behind the upper front plate....it makes the tank kinda flamable (I hope that is a word in english) 



GTRaPToR #25 Posted 10 August 2014 - 01:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22944 battles
  • 2,401
  • [BG_WP] BG_WP
  • Member since:
    03-03-2012
Actually I'm pretty sure 140 has had a silent module nerf. It gets ammo racked in every second game. When it came, it didn't have that problem.

GRS_Storm #26 Posted 15 August 2014 - 11:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24644 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    11-23-2012

This is my best game,still its lose :( You can see here high DPM,agility and armor.

http://wotreplays.eu/site/1084641#steppes-stormquake-object_140



TheMarketGardener #27 Posted 23 August 2014 - 12:25 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18820 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011
Real debate on wich to choose *(first)*, Obj 140 or T-62A... :sceptic:

Mediums_X_are_OP #28 Posted 23 August 2014 - 04:10 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51027 battles
  • 2,712
  • [TUN] TUN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012
An OP vehicle made for cowards, opportunists and statspadders wich shot filthy from the back the tanks engaged in battle.

TheMarketGardener #29 Posted 23 August 2014 - 09:54 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18820 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011

View PostWG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, on 23 August 2014 - 06:10 PM, said:

An OP vehicle made for cowards, opportunists and statspadders wich shot filthy from the back the tanks engaged in battle.

 

Mind to mention what exacty is OP about this tank?



Mediums_X_are_OP #30 Posted 24 August 2014 - 12:38 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51027 battles
  • 2,712
  • [TUN] TUN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012

Just take a look at this: http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/eu

 



TheMarketGardener #31 Posted 24 August 2014 - 12:21 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18820 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011

View PostWG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, on 24 August 2014 - 02:38 AM, said:

Just take a look at this: http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/eu

 

 

Its fourth, also according to this the bat-chat and stb-1 are more op.

On a side note, Maus second? Too OP plz nerf...



putos_opat_v_akci #32 Posted 24 August 2014 - 12:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26926 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PRASE] PRASE
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012

View Postjimliras313, on 23 August 2014 - 01:25 PM, said:

Real debate on wich to choose *(first)*, Obj 140 or T-62A... :sceptic:

well.....t62 has a epic turret, object is faster (long ranges) and has a better gun depression

for me as a player who dont play CW, I went for object, just for the speed and gun depression, in random games with random tomatoes (hi cohen7448) who dont know about the roof top overmach, the turret is good enough, it can still bounce of front and turret cheecks and the UFP is better then the T62As (in most time it doesnt matter)

 

btw, I still have a T54 and now I am 30k away from T62A.....so you get both in some time

 

EDIT: and just ignore trolls, they dont know what they are talking about


Edited by putos_opat_v_akci, 24 August 2014 - 12:37 PM.


TheMarketGardener #33 Posted 24 August 2014 - 01:37 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18820 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011

View Postputos_opat_v_akci, on 24 August 2014 - 02:36 PM, said:

well.....t62 has a epic turret, object is faster (long ranges) and has a better gun depression

for me as a player who dont play CW, I went for object, just for the speed and gun depression, in random games with random tomatoes (hi cohen7448) who dont know about the roof top overmach, the turret is good enough, it can still bounce of front and turret cheecks and the UFP is better then the T62As (in most time it doesnt matter)

 

btw, I still have a T54 and now I am 30k away from T62A.....so you get both in some time

 

EDIT: and just ignore trolls, they dont know what they are talking about

 

Considering I play my Patton alot, I'm starting to lean more towards the 140, just 'cause gun dep... But I also like my WZ-120 with shite deppresion... Oh my... But yeah, Obj. for me...

 

As for teh trollz, I don't mind, they offer the opportunity to retaliate (Maus OP... huehuehue  :trollface:)



Mediums_X_are_OP #34 Posted 24 August 2014 - 03:14 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51027 battles
  • 2,712
  • [TUN] TUN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012

View Postjimliras313, on 24 August 2014 - 01:21 PM, said:

 

Its fourth, also according to this the bat-chat and stb-1 are more op.

On a side note, Maus second? Too OP plz nerf...

 

Just read carefuly the numbers, WR l mean, and not the order are placed.


Edited by WG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, 24 August 2014 - 04:55 PM.


TheMarketGardener #35 Posted 24 August 2014 - 08:28 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18820 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011

View PostWG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, on 24 August 2014 - 05:14 PM, said:

 

Just read carefuly the numbers, WR l mean, and not the order are placed.

 

Ok now im geting confused... What are you trying to say? Read the win rates but not in the order they are? If that's the case then most of the T10 MT's are OP according to your standards. BTW, most of the time WR alone doesn't deem a tank OP or not, you should know this stuff...



Mediums_X_are_OP #36 Posted 25 August 2014 - 03:12 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51027 battles
  • 2,712
  • [TUN] TUN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012
If a vehicle is able to influence the WR of a team at such exend, it means is to powerfull, the more it turns the tie in it´s favour, in the team favor as a matter of fact, wich consists of 15 tanks, the stronger that vehicle is. If you insist l´ll explain to you the whole bunch those mediums are bringing and are capable of, thanks to the "briliant" WG design. But l think the results are well known to everybody, often those tinny tanks are inflicting the most damage in the enemy team by exploiting the maps and all the goodies those posess.

Edited by WG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, 25 August 2014 - 03:17 AM.


putos_opat_v_akci #37 Posted 25 August 2014 - 05:28 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26926 battles
  • 1,408
  • [PRASE] PRASE
  • Member since:
    04-29-2012

View PostWG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, on 25 August 2014 - 04:12 AM, said:

....

go away

what exatly is OP on object? the lowest alfa damage on tier 10? one of the lowest hp pool on tier 10? 30mm of turret roof armor? 6 degrees of gun depression (lol, almost like the song), 400m view range? ammorack and fuel tanks in the front?

the object is as good as its driver....as an any tank in the game 



Mediums_X_are_OP #38 Posted 25 August 2014 - 09:08 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51027 battles
  • 2,712
  • [TUN] TUN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012
You just exposed the weaker points of this particular medium, the strong points however still remain in the dark.

TheMarketGardener #39 Posted 25 August 2014 - 01:56 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18820 battles
  • 2,962
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    01-22-2011

View PostWG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, on 25 August 2014 - 05:12 AM, said:

If a vehicle is able to influence the WR of a team at such exend, it means is to powerfull, the more it turns the tie in it´s favour, in the team favor as a matter of fact, wich consists of 15 tanks, the stronger that vehicle is. If you insist l´ll explain to you the whole bunch those mediums are bringing and are capable of, thanks to the "briliant" WG design. But l think the results are well known to everybody, often those tinny tanks are inflicting the most damage in the enemy team by exploiting the maps and all the goodies those posess.

 

Ok then let's nerf all meds so they average 50% WR and rework all maps so players can't exploit positions to their advantage (wich is impossible)...

Seriously though since when was battlefield mobility and exploiting advantageous positions a bad thing? Winning is the objective of WoT, Isn't it? Anyone with a brain will try to turn the fight in their favor. There is no such thing as "fair fights" in WoT. If you try to have a fair fight every time then you're a fool and you deserve to loose.

 

Go back under your bridge, you're polluting a great thread with your nonsense.



Mediums_X_are_OP #40 Posted 25 August 2014 - 02:04 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51027 battles
  • 2,712
  • [TUN] TUN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012

View Postjimliras313, on 25 August 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

 

Ok then let's nerf all meds so they average 50% WR and rework all maps so players can't exploit positions to their advantage (wich is impossible)...

Seriously though since when was battlefield mobility and exploiting advantageous positions a bad thing? Winning is the objective of WoT, Isn't it? Anyone with a brain will try to turn the fight in their favor. There is no such thing as "fair fights" in WoT. If you try to have a fair fight every time then you're a fool and you deserve to loose.

 

Go back under your bridge, you're polluting a great thread with your nonsense.

 

The statistics are proving that this meds are OP and if you won´t recognise it, you´re just an opportunist wich tryes to keep his advantages.

 

Do you have any bridge to go under..? That must´ve be something you do, that´s why you´re supposing another could share the same destiny. Cause l ain´t got any bridge, l live in a house.

 

Meds: Strong gun, high speed/mobility, best camo, even better turret armour than the heavys, low profile, exploiting the high vantage points, shoting from the back while the heavys and some TDs doesn´t have the technical capabilities to return fire by circleing etc, isn´t to much of goodies..? I´m affraid for you aren´t, you´d be glad to even gain a few more extra if there are any left...


Edited by WG_pls_fixMM_and_OPs_thx, 25 August 2014 - 02:16 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users