Jump to content


because you want proof

to many loses

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
73 replies to this topic

CaptainPanos #1 Posted 06 May 2014 - 12:02 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11619 battles
  • 83
  • [HACC] HACC
  • Member since:
    08-14-2013

some in my previous post, ask for evidence for consecutive defeats in battles. I hope these photos are acceptable.
It is only in random battles, with all tier, playing alone, in one day. (2 shots cos reset the xvm)

after 64 battles, the scor is 18 wins / 46 loses. = 39.13% (and it was a good day)

If you think that they should be, and that a player can turn the battle, then you do well WarGaming.
And please do not write craps.
I can play as good as you. Be confident.

note, i read all your posts, but i dont answer to anyone cos the answers of the most is spam and out of the point.

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_260.jpg   552.18K
  • Attached File   shot_267.jpg   530.08K


divinity_123 #2 Posted 06 May 2014 - 12:06 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10485 battles
  • 1,088
  • Member since:
    05-15-2013

You have 46 win rate yourself. 39% is not THAT much different from the norm.

Maybe you should find ways to improve yourself first before complaining about MM.



macman90 #3 Posted 06 May 2014 - 12:41 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25139 battles
  • 278
  • Member since:
    11-23-2012
Better ISP + better PC = more win rate

Siimcy_ #4 Posted 06 May 2014 - 12:47 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 67 battles
  • 1,014
  • Member since:
    11-04-2013
Play in platoons as 3 organised players can do more than 1.

Woody1999 #5 Posted 06 May 2014 - 12:47 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14730 battles
  • 6,482
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011
^ I'm pretty sure it has a little to do with skill as well.

Woody1999 #6 Posted 06 May 2014 - 12:48 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14730 battles
  • 6,482
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011
Argh! I wish I could quote people on this stupid mobile.

-

Woody



Tidal_Force #7 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:03 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16192 battles
  • 6,839
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View PostSiimcy_, on 06 May 2014 - 12:47 AM, said:

Play in platoons as 3 organised players can do more than 1.


Don't say that. You are making tomatos like OP (7k battles, 46 wr, including friggin 545 @ 45,14% on Hellcat :amazed: see for yourself: http://www.noobmeter...anos/513105663/) think that you don't need skill when playing platoon. And I guess you know what will be the impact of 3 well organised and tightly coordinated tomato campers/suiciders on match dynamic.

 

Edit: removed accidental red colour copied from noobmeter, I recalled that mods may be overzealous about colours


Edited by Tidal_Force, 06 May 2014 - 01:15 AM.


Siimcy_ #8 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:10 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 67 battles
  • 1,014
  • Member since:
    11-04-2013
Ofc you need some common sense or else its useless. People who can't even manage %50 should finally accept their mistakes or else things wont get better.

Th3M8dH8tt3r #9 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:15 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7091 battles
  • 385
  • [PXR] PXR
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013

One person can't make up for 10 crapplayers. 5 people can't. I don't know what people are thinking when they're saying carry a team. I have never seen a unicum turn a game around and win it. I've done it once and that's because I was up against inexperienced players. 

 

There's something severely broken with match making. How is it I'm one of the top 3 or 5 rated people 95% of the time with a WN8 of 770??? My WR used to be 52% and rising but since been stuck with 10 less than 600, even 500, WN8 players nearly every game, how am I meant to win? 

 

The only way I can increase my rating WN8 is if I forget about the rest of the team and try to deal 2,000 damage. It's easy and I'll have a great WN8 but WR still won't change. So, I'll be a skilled player based on WN8 but can't change WR. 

 

Anyone who says MM isn't broken is blind as far as I'm concerned. 

 

I've platooned with two guys with WN8 of over 1500 and we lost 21 out of 22 battles and we tried everything to turn it around. I've won 11 out of 40 in a day and been top 3 player on my team for perhaps 35 of those games. It's not me or other players, it's the MM and being stuck with inexperienced players, super casual players. 



GemmaLou #10 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:15 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 8127 battles
  • 5,113
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013
you did 133 damage in the marder 38 and wonder why you lose a lot.... wow just wow

BattleMetalChris #11 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:16 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 9222 battles
  • 7,685
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
You are not shooting enough stuff. Shoot more stuff. If you shoot more stuff you will win more.

divinity_123 #12 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:21 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10485 battles
  • 1,088
  • Member since:
    05-15-2013

View PostTh3M8dH8tt3r, on 06 May 2014 - 02:15 AM, said:

One person can't make up for 10 crapplayers. 5 people can't. I don't know what people are thinking when they're saying carry a team. I have never seen a unicum turn a game around and win it. I've done it once and that's because I was up against inexperienced players. 

 

There's something severely broken with match making. How is it I'm one of the top 3 or 5 rated people 95% of the time with a WN8 of 770??? My WR used to be 52% and rising but since been stuck with 10 less than 600, even 500, WN8 players nearly every game, how am I meant to win? 

 

The only way I can increase my rating WN8 is if I forget about the rest of the team and try to deal 2,000 damage. It's easy and I'll have a great WN8 but WR still won't change. So, I'll be a skilled player based on WN8 but can't change WR. 

 

Anyone who says MM isn't broken is blind as far as I'm concerned. 

 

I've platooned with two guys with WN8 of over 1500 and we lost 21 out of 22 battles and we tried everything to turn it around. I've won 11 out of 40 in a day and been top 3 player on my team for perhaps 35 of those games. It's not me or other players, it's the MM and being stuck with inexperienced players, super casual players. 

That is the exact problem with the game, not MM largely. (although we have to question why you are always on the side of more causal players)



MatchyHK #13 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:22 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16896 battles
  • 339
  • Member since:
    10-28-2013
OP trying to play Marder 38T like a heavy tank?

Tidal_Force #14 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:23 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16192 battles
  • 6,839
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View PostSiimcy_, on 06 May 2014 - 01:10 AM, said:

Ofc you need some common sense or else its useless. People who can't even manage %50 should finally accept their mistakes or else things wont get better.


Don't be ridiculous, it's obviously not his fault, it's yours! You are guilty of not carrying him hard enough. Or perhaps mine, for not following him into an obvious killzone.



Th3M8dH8tt3r #15 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:24 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7091 battles
  • 385
  • [PXR] PXR
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013

View Postdivinity_123, on 06 May 2014 - 01:21 AM, said:

That is the exact problem with the game, not MM largely. (although we have to question why you are always on the side of more causal players)

 

I don't get what you're saying. My point was there's something up with MM which you've said is the exact problem but it's not MM largely??? And what are you questioning about casual players? That I'm siding with them or on their team? I'm not a casual player and I am assuming the people who are rubbish and blatantly not experienced in the game are due to being casual players. 

 

Can you clarify your points please.



Siimcy_ #16 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 67 battles
  • 1,014
  • Member since:
    11-04-2013

View PostTh3M8dH8tt3r, on 06 May 2014 - 02:15 AM, said:

One person can't make up for 10 crapplayers. 5 people can't. I don't know what people are thinking when they're saying carry a team. I have never seen a unicum turn a game around and win it. I've done it once and that's because I was up against inexperienced players. 

 

There's something severely broken with match making. How is it I'm one of the top 3 or 5 rated people 95% of the time with a WN8 of 770??? My WR used to be 52% and rising but since been stuck with 10 less than 600, even 500, WN8 players nearly every game, how am I meant to win? 

 

The only way I can increase my rating WN8 is if I forget about the rest of the team and try to deal 2,000 damage. It's easy and I'll have a great WN8 but WR still won't change. So, I'll be a skilled player based on WN8 but can't change WR. 

 

Anyone who says MM isn't broken is blind as far as I'm concerned. 

 

I've platooned with two guys with WN8 of over 1500 and we lost 21 out of 22 battles and we tried everything to turn it around. I've won 11 out of 40 in a day and been top 3 player on my team for perhaps 35 of those games. It's not me or other players, it's the MM and being stuck with inexperienced players, super casual players. 

 

 

TBH 700wn is really bad. Start shooting things, stop going YOLO.



Gloris #17 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:25 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19748 battles
  • 1,691
  • Member since:
    08-14-2011

Op you have Bot niveau stats while sealclubbing on T2 (second screenshot)

Take a wild guess why you lose more games then you win

 

Free tip: It's not WG rigging the games so that you lose.



_ramrus_ #18 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:28 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23831 battles
  • 212
  • Member since:
    12-27-2011

View PostCaptainPanos, on 06 May 2014 - 12:02 AM, said:

I can play as good as you. Be confident.

I play with my monitor turned off. Hardly achievement to play as good as me.

 

View PostSiimcy_, on 06 May 2014 - 12:47 AM, said:

Play in platoons as 3 organised players can do more than 1.

Tomato platoons actually perform the opposite of the uni platoons.

They completely sink the flank they are on.

 

But, emagine how hard must life be for player of his caliber. He is performing the best? of his abilities and yet he is not rewarded for his games. Should WG micromanage the MM to ensure this guy can beat me ? ( Like removing all my ammo while battle is loading )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



divinity_123 #19 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:29 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10485 battles
  • 1,088
  • Member since:
    05-15-2013

View PostTh3M8dH8tt3r, on 06 May 2014 - 02:24 AM, said:

 

I don't get what you're saying. My point was there's something up with MM which you've said is the exact problem but it's not MM largely??? And what are you questioning about casual players? That I'm siding with them or on their team? I'm not a casual player and I am assuming the people who are rubbish and blatantly not experienced in the game are due to being casual players. 

 

Can you clarify your points please.

The problem is that there are too many "causal players" that basically determines that game from minute 1.

When you are the team get more of them, you will have a higher probability of losing.

In a game like this, shouldn't we compare about which team has better skill, rather than worse in the first place?



divinity_123 #20 Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:30 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10485 battles
  • 1,088
  • Member since:
    05-15-2013

View Post_ramrus_, on 06 May 2014 - 02:28 AM, said:

Tomato platoons actually perform the opposite of the uni platoons.

They completely sink the flank they are on.

So much painful truth.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users