Jump to content


Worst T10 player you've seen?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
39 replies to this topic

Mr_Sukebe #1 Posted 14 May 2014 - 08:50 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32368 battles
  • 2,623
  • [ZOLO] ZOLO
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

Just wondering if anyone can undercut the IS7 driver I had on our team last night with a 39% WR.

Have to say that I've no idea how someone can have such a negative impact upon his teams, not unless he regularly shoots teammates.

 

You guys?



DruggedUpTurtle #2 Posted 14 May 2014 - 08:53 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4076 battles
  • 87
  • [F_O_H] F_O_H
  • Member since:
    12-22-2013

In a game on my Borsig - IS-4 with 35% winrate. 

 

Worst I've seen so far.



Drue #3 Posted 14 May 2014 - 08:53 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14910 battles
  • 103
  • Member since:
    08-09-2011
I ones saw a tier 10 driver killing himself. thats a bad player

Xensation #4 Posted 14 May 2014 - 08:53 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Clan Commander
  • 15736 battles
  • 7,712
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
I once saw a guy with 38% wins overall (20k+ battles) and 36% wins on his IS-7 with thousands of games. He platooned with only slightly better clan mates of his (all still worse than bots).

Edited by Xensation, 14 May 2014 - 08:54 AM.


Salvothegamer #5 Posted 14 May 2014 - 08:54 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23270 battles
  • 696
  • [2SH] 2SH
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011

Well i belive if you play your T10 really crap and do 0 damage in all your games or tank no damage in your IS7 you can get such bad stats in T10 just because the opposition is so much better then in low tiers.

You must not be a team killer, you are just making your team play with 14 tanks against 15 which sounds not hard but makes a big difference in this high tiers.


Edited by Salvothegamer, 14 May 2014 - 08:55 AM.


anonym_kL7qtn3e52MB #6 Posted 14 May 2014 - 09:15 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 6,815
  • Member since:
    07-10-2018

Did you tell your mom you met a bad player..?

 

 

 

(Oh lol, I forgot, people have no sense of humor, hence the negative reps...)


Edited by Costarring, 14 May 2014 - 09:38 AM.


tajj7 #7 Posted 14 May 2014 - 09:47 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25793 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostSalvothegamer, on 14 May 2014 - 08:54 AM, said:

Well i belive if you play your T10 really crap and do 0 damage in all your games or tank no damage in your IS7 you can get such bad stats in T10 just because the opposition is so much better then in low tiers.

You must not be a team killer, you are just making your team play with 14 tanks against 15 which sounds not hard but makes a big difference in this high tiers.

 

 

I'd also presume that you most tier 10 games are not full of tier 10s? there are probably between 3-5 tier 10s a side? so in reality you could be depriving your team of 25 -33% of your teams main tank strength and you could argue that a tier 10 tank is worth at least two maybe even three tier 8 tanks.

 

Thus not really just one player down but say 2.5 players down. 



shaermon #8 Posted 14 May 2014 - 09:50 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 38850 battles
  • 1,072
  • [PR-22] PR-22
  • Member since:
    01-05-2011

Someone told me I stink and should uninstall the game while driving my Batchat 25t.

 

So I guess myself?



TankkiPoju #9 Posted 14 May 2014 - 09:56 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21002 battles
  • 6,426
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

 

Guys...

 

why do you think there are bots in the game, grinding slowly towards tier 10 tanks?



ilhilh #10 Posted 14 May 2014 - 10:04 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27232 battles
  • 2,001
  • [FIFO] FIFO
  • Member since:
    04-06-2012

I saw a 41% E-50M the other day and that was the lowest I had seen in a long time - you get loads of 44-46% tier Xs but it is rare to see them that bad.

 

As for the IS-4 DruggedUpTurtle, did you check which gun he had on it.  It was only a few months ago that I last saw an IS-4 with the D-25T on it and some people still try and tell me it is acceptable.  It has been the best part of 2 years since the 2nd soviet heavy line was added and ever since then it is impossible to get to the IS-4 without researching the meaty M62-T2 at tier IX.  So, anyone without the top gun has either had the IS-4 from when it was tier IX... and not managed to grind out 59.3k exp or they have bought the IS-4 and not mounted the top gun. Either of which is ridiculous.  175 pen in a tier X game turns the IS-4 into a block of XP for the enemy team.



ChroTal #11 Posted 14 May 2014 - 10:35 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 19190 battles
  • 1,795
  • Member since:
    10-05-2010

The thing I really dont understand is how someone can have sub 40% winrates on any tank after hundrets of battles.

 

It's not like the absence of a single player would hurt the team THAT much... I believe in order to have such a bad winrate you need to actively SABOTAGE the game, by blocking teammates, shooting them etc.

 

Even afk bots have a higher winrate man...

 

Edit: So unless he has a botfarm of 3 pcs and is botting in platoon, doing nothing with 3 top tiers, I doubt it is possible to be that bad.


Edited by ChroTal, 14 May 2014 - 10:36 AM.


Flyntlock #12 Posted 14 May 2014 - 10:37 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 24305 battles
  • 834
  • Member since:
    07-30-2010
Always being told i am a terrible tier ten player,...so i guess i am the worst tier ten player i know.....but then again i play for fun.

Brent_Rambo #13 Posted 14 May 2014 - 10:48 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3171 battles
  • 112
  • [JELLY] JELLY
  • Member since:
    11-16-2013
I have screen shot of true terrible e-100 driver. He had 38% WR with 8k battles, tomato stats ofcourse.

xxlguru #14 Posted 14 May 2014 - 10:53 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 42685 battles
  • 3,742
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011

Well I play a lot of tier X games. (Maybe that is a main reason why am I so frustrated with this game  :trollface:)

 

So OFC I see lot of useless people. Seen 2K games people completelly red in Tier X tanks. Seen a man with 00 eff with tier X tank.

 

Then again I see people who should be good and should be good in tanks that I have seen them in, but then they do not bring essential things into a battle.

 

Like day before yesterday, I hit T-62-A with 15 CM shell from E100 gun and initially take like 780 HP off and he bruns till he was on like 500 hp. I mean how the hell? Green player with nice amount of games. Good performance in his tank and did not turn off the fire? No fire esinguisher? OFC he was angry and talked smack and HEAT shell gold noob thing and so on. But who was a noob? Me for using proper tool to disable his scoutting or him letting him self to burn to a crisp? I needed to ding on his turret like 5 times and let him do 3k scoutting damage? Nah I rather disable him and render theirs arty less dangerous.

 

So I guess everyone has his "Great" moments. I bet in some of the games if you have seen me you could have said worse player in the world.

 

Question is only who does it all the time. Stats show that red people do it more often.

 

So suck less. This is meant to me as well OFC.



Adwaenyth #15 Posted 14 May 2014 - 10:54 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 19513 battles
  • 2,781
  • [F_D] F_D
  • Member since:
    05-19-2011
About 3k battles played, about 300 average xp, 36% overall WR and sits in an IS7. Perfect example why NOT to rush a tank line when you start WoT. 3k * 300 sums it up to roughly 900k XP which is barely enough to grind through the entire tree to get the IS7.

xxlguru #16 Posted 14 May 2014 - 11:00 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 42685 battles
  • 3,742
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011

BTW I have seen a Unicum in 121. Great player. On start I see he has red stats on 121. Asked him about it and he states he can nto find him self into that tank. He goes off and plays as he should. Goodd positioning and expected leel of aggression. Bu that tank is not good for him so he dies. We have lost.

 

Does that make him worse player? He looked to some as suiciding noob. Not to me. If he was in his normal medium he would be able to do things he knows he can do. I am sure he "overshoots it" because he does automatically what he knows that must work and it does nto due to slugishnes of 121, lack of gun depression, lack of laser like accuracy etc. etc. It must be highly frustrating not being able to do what you can do.

 

So everyone can look bad at times. I am not worries that much about it. I mean shaermon do not worry about it :smile:

 

I bet person saying that was worse player then you anyway.


Edited by xxlguru, 14 May 2014 - 11:00 AM.


Moulie #17 Posted 14 May 2014 - 11:04 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10747 battles
  • 1,067
  • [W__F] W__F
  • Member since:
    04-07-2013
I don't play higher than Tier 6 tanks at the moment, until if get a bit better, so my worst seen players are tier 8. But when you see your tier 8 heavies with either 2k games and 43% or 20k games and low 40% you do wonder what fun they get out of huge game and why they keep on playing. Last week I was in my Jackson and our Tiger 1 player had 2k games, 43% global wr and 35% on the Tiger. He averaged less damage in 300 games in a tier 8 than I had in my tier 5 tanks. What sort of enjoyment is that player getting from only winning 1 in 3 matches in his Tiger?

BrokenWing #18 Posted 14 May 2014 - 11:29 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 25785 battles
  • 5,014
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-16-2011

My mathematical head can't quite understand how someone can get below a 45% win ratio without trying really hard to sabotage every game they played.

 

I mean it takes me all my effort and what modicum of skill I have to try and push towards a 55% win ratio, surely it takes a similar effort (negatively) to get a 45% win ratio?

 

But 38%? 39%? Jesus you must be just dying early with little or no damage every match, especially when top tier.

 

How or why do these people keep playing? Maybe they are satisfied with getting 1 or 2 penetrations a game and that's the limit of their fun factor?

 

"Yay! I shot something!"

 

"Next battle..."

 

"Yay! I shot something!"

 

"Next battle,,,"



Adwaenyth #19 Posted 14 May 2014 - 12:01 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 19513 battles
  • 2,781
  • [F_D] F_D
  • Member since:
    05-19-2011

View PostBrokenWing, on 14 May 2014 - 12:29 PM, said:

My mathematical head can't quite understand how someone can get below a 45% win ratio without trying really hard to sabotage every game they played.

 

I mean it takes me all my effort and what modicum of skill I have to try and push towards a 55% win ratio, surely it takes a similar effort (negatively) to get a 45% win ratio?

 

Don't forget the mean value is somewhere around 49% so that actually makes it as hard to achieve 55% as it is for 43%...

 

So since I'm around 60% the mirror result would be 38%... And we have people like Xensation with ~70% WR... guess what that would mean for the negative record... :tongue:



Flyntlock #20 Posted 14 May 2014 - 12:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 24305 battles
  • 834
  • Member since:
    07-30-2010

View PostBrokenWing, on 14 May 2014 - 10:29 AM, said:

My mathematical head can't quite understand how someone can get below a 45% win ratio without trying really hard to sabotage every game they played.

 

I mean it takes me all my effort and what modicum of skill I have to try and push towards a 55% win ratio, surely it takes a similar effort (negatively) to get a 45% win ratio?

 

But 38%? 39%? Jesus you must be just dying early with little or no damage every match, especially when top tier.

 

How or why do these people keep playing? Maybe they are satisfied with getting 1 or 2 penetrations a game and that's the limit of their fun factor?

 

"Yay! I shot something!"

 

"Next battle..."

 

"Yay! I shot something!"

 

"Next battle,,,"

 

 

What can i say . I am just a terrible player.


Edited by Flyntlock, 14 May 2014 - 12:10 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users