Jump to content


WoT graphics compared to other games


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
3 replies to this topic

Metalsme #1 Posted 02 June 2014 - 03:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7678 battles
  • 21
  • [T-D-M] T-D-M
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

Alrighty, with all those big titles coming out, i want to get my hands on some them, but seeing as my PC can only just run WoT at max settings at without overheating, i came here to ask, How graphically heavy is WoT compared to some of the newer big fps games? (eg Titanfall, Watch doges, Wolfernstein)



szczerbo1507 #2 Posted 02 June 2014 - 04:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 26647 battles
  • 1,682
  • [P_R_T] P_R_T
  • Member since:
    07-20-2010
Graphically heavy? For sure not more than these games. The problem is with the engine, which is using CPU's and hard drivers instead of GPU's and RAM. WoT is using only one CPU core and it's not loading data direct to RAM, but mostly from HDD (notice the lags when receiving first hit, spot etc.).

Metalsme #3 Posted 02 June 2014 - 04:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7678 battles
  • 21
  • [T-D-M] T-D-M
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

well i guess i could say it like this instead: Can i run the newest games on max with this:

 

16 Gigs ram

AMD 7950 OCed

i5 3570K OCed to 4.7 ghz

ASUS P8Z77-V LX


Edited by Metalsme, 02 June 2014 - 04:16 PM.


Laponac #4 Posted 04 June 2014 - 11:07 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Community Contributor
  • 35664 battles
  • 1,518
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostMetalsme, on 02 June 2014 - 05:16 PM, said:

well i guess i could say it like this instead: Can i run the newest games on max with this:

 

16 Gigs ram

AMD 7950 OCed

i5 3570K OCed to 4.7 ghz

ASUS P8Z77-V LX

 

Did you come here to brag or something? 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users