Jump to content


My logic finally snapped in half.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
10 replies to this topic

LaterTimeLord #1 Posted 15 July 2014 - 09:46 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

I [edited] hate these [edited] HD models, they're simple eye candy stuff... I WANT MY OLD TANK MODELS BACK!

 

Yeah, here it is. I'll be trying to force my client to use old tank models from different outdated versions.

 

BECAUSE...

 

I,

AM,

DONE,

WITH,

HD!

[edited]!

 

 



K_A #2 Posted 15 July 2014 - 04:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13643 battles
  • 4,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
If it's an issue of fps dropping, in 9.2 the only tank that will be rendered in HD will be your own tank (if it has an HD model made), all the rest of the allied and enemy tanks will have the old textures on them. 

LaterTimeLord #3 Posted 15 July 2014 - 06:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17512 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012
quoted post removed

My PC has 4GB RAM; AMD Phenom II 960T Quad-Core CPU, with 2.8GHz per processor; and ATI Radeon 5970 GPU with 800MHz core clock... Does that sound like a [edited] old toaster to you? If so, don't comment.


View PostK_A, on 15 July 2014 - 06:22 PM, said:

If it's an issue of fps dropping, in 9.2 the only tank that will be rendered in HD will be your own tank (if it has an HD model made), all the rest of the allied and enemy tanks will have the old textures on them. 

No... It's because of the mental levels of ugliness of the new HD models.


quoted post removed 

 

 

 

But why did you feel like you had to reply like this?


Edited by RogDodgeUK, 20 July 2014 - 04:53 PM.
Moderated by RogDodgeUK


mrwanwan #4 Posted 15 July 2014 - 06:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18781 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    07-05-2011

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 15 July 2014 - 06:

But why did you feel like you had to reply like this?

Because as far as I'm aware 8-bit games do not have HD models.

 



Ulfhedinn_ #5 Posted 15 July 2014 - 07:03 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48246 battles
  • 7,041
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
Well, in WOWP's they've changed the patch updates, so that now you get a choice of uploading and having the game SD or HD. Maybe they will do the same in WOT's so you can have your fugly square wheeled tanks again? Meanwhile, don't you have a TARDIS you could use to nip back to 8.9ish?

Judqment8 #6 Posted 15 July 2014 - 07:07 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 22108 battles
  • 3,984
  • Member since:
    09-21-2011

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 15 July 2014 - 08:41 PM, said:

 

My PC has 4GB RAM; AMD Phenom II 960T Quad-Core CPU, with 2.8GHz per processor; and ATI Radeon 5970 GPU with 800MHz core clock... Does that sound like a [edited] old toaster to you? If so, don't comment.


 

Then what are you whining? Don't like new HD models? well boohoo... Besides in one of the future patches you will be able to select between SD and HD textures.

 

Quit your whining.



Ohaithar #7 Posted 15 July 2014 - 08:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 407 battles
  • 1,918
  • Member since:
    01-15-2014

View PostJudqment8, on 15 July 2014 - 05:52 PM, said:

Why even play games if they look like turd on screen?

 

Quake 3 is saddened by your statement. You made it feel bad when its only graphics-related feature was the addition of rounded edges.



1ncompetenc3 #8 Posted 15 July 2014 - 09:12 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36945 battles
  • 11,492
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 15 July 2014 - 07:41 PM, said:

 

My PC has 4GB RAM; AMD Phenom II 960T Quad-Core CPU, with 2.8GHz per processor; and ATI Radeon 5970 GPU with 800MHz core clock... Does that sound like a [edited] old toaster to you? If so, don't comment.

 

I am going to comment precisely because that sounds like a toaster to me. :child:

But rejoice, because WG went full [edited] and decided only your own tank has to be in HD in 9.2. :facepalm:


Edited by RogDodgeUK, 20 July 2014 - 04:55 PM.
Moderated due to inappropriate content. RogDodgeUK


Killer_Shadow #9 Posted 16 July 2014 - 10:30 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25276 battles
  • 1,651
  • [ALIE] ALIE
  • Member since:
    04-30-2012

View PostVonnis, on 15 July 2014 - 09:12 PM, said:

 

...

But rejoice, because WG went full  [edited] and decided only your own tank has to be in HD in 9.2. :facepalm:

 

Well said.

 

Besides the issues about so called "improved" graphics, the major problems of the players are unbalanced MM (neverending story), weird RNG, stupid nerfs/buffs (over and over again) etc. and WG is still insisting on improvement of graphics, even though they don't understand what "improvement" really means.


Edited by RogDodgeUK, 20 July 2014 - 04:56 PM.
Moderated due to inappropriate content. RogDodgeUK


LUNSSI #10 Posted 16 July 2014 - 10:39 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 2,370
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

What I am about to say is not PC nor is it quite fair or even totally true. I shall generalize and stick to my guns in the doing of it!

 

Most of the players playing on toasters are the bots, potatoes and free loaders that ruin the potential for teamwork in this game.

 

WG wants to cater for them and thier massive contributions to development then so be it who am I to argue with soviet block mentality.


Edited by Stoke_Me_A_Clipper, 16 July 2014 - 10:40 AM.


_PapaSmurf_ #11 Posted 17 July 2014 - 11:40 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 347 battles
  • 487
  • Member since:
    07-31-2013

View PostLaterTimeLord, on 15 July 2014 - 06:41 PM, said:

 

My PC has 4GB RAM; AMD Phenom II 960T Quad-Core CPU, with 2.8GHz per processor; and ATI Radeon 5970 GPU with 800MHz core clock... Does that sound like a [edited] old toaster to you?

 

Not at all!!
The toaster in my kitchen is more powerful.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users