Jump to content


IQ in relation to WOT skill.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
92 replies to this topic

K_A #21 Posted 23 July 2014 - 09:21 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13712 battles
  • 4,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
IQ 128, last 1000 battles WN8 1880 win% 55. It was closer to 2000 and 57% but stats have dropped bc I had to spend 6 months in the army, only playing the odd session every other weekend. Inactivity really takes it's toll on your performance.

bean57 #22 Posted 23 July 2014 - 09:31 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18721 battles
  • 2,951
  • Member since:
    12-19-2012

@OP - why haven't you posted yours?  Surely that would have been the intelligent way to set the ball rolling

 

Regarding using online tests I suggest you read this article.  You need to read it all, it's not very long

 

http://www.theguardi...-are-they-valid

 



LUNSSI #23 Posted 23 July 2014 - 10:23 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 2,370
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

View PostJohn_Preston, on 23 July 2014 - 06:58 PM, said:

That's actually quite impressive.

 

 

Arnold: if you want to do this "half serious" then at least try use coherent data. Different test can give different results of course, but the main problem is the different scales. 120 on one scale can be 160 on another one. How about giving us 2-3 tests(links to websites) and then we can post a result that you can actually use.

Right now this little survey is not even half serious.

 

wat.jpg

 

I did ask in the OP to do 4 online tests obviously from seperate sources. Perhaps the most important part of this test is the ability to recognise the number 4.. HA HA HA HA:trollface:. forgive me.. on a more serious note perhaps I should have linked 4 websites to keep the data controlled however I was not aware the data would differ so much from site to site. My test was taken in the lab where my creator made me.:child:

View Postbean57, on 23 July 2014 - 09:31 PM, said:

@OP - why haven't you posted yours?  Surely that would have been the intelligent way to set the ball rolling

 

Regarding using online tests I suggest you read this article.  You need to read it all, it's not very long

 

http://www.theguardi...-are-they-valid

 

I have a tiny Pen1s.



LUNSSI #24 Posted 23 July 2014 - 10:36 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 2,370
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013
Anyway gents please do 4 tests take the average... post the score. Tis test cannot be 100% accurate the only way to do that is for each of you to go and take a test in a controlled environment and whos going to do that ? thanks for taking part those who have done so allready!

Iddra #25 Posted 23 July 2014 - 11:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26916 battles
  • 513
  • Member since:
    12-10-2011

101 IQ

http://i.imgur.com/HjQKQ7C.png

Stats: http://www.noobmeter...Xx__/501904170/

Also i used iqtest.com

 


Edited by __xXMASTERXx__, 23 July 2014 - 11:24 PM.


LUNSSI #26 Posted 24 July 2014 - 04:04 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 2,370
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

View Post__xXMASTERXx__, on 23 July 2014 - 11:12 PM, said:

 

Thanks for posting. Does that mean you just did 1 test on 1 website?

 

 



2Tee2 #27 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:35 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014
so, guys, how do you think, which one is more of an achievement, having an "iq" of 60- or 140+ ? 

_Antipathy #28 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:47 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View Post2Tee2, on 24 July 2014 - 05:35 PM, said:

so, guys, how do you think, which one is more of an achievement, having an "iq" of 60- or 140+ ? 

 

60 of course.



2Tee2 #29 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:48 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

View PostVonnis, on 22 July 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:

I fully support what I suspect to be an elaborate plot to troll people. :popcorn:

 

wish it were



2Tee2 #30 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:52 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

View Post_Antipathy, on 24 July 2014 - 06:47 PM, said:

 

60 of course.

 

thanx, gotta admit i wasnt expecting you to be the one restoring my faith in natural selection :D



John_Preston #31 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17436 battles
  • 6,373
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

View Post2Tee2, on 24 July 2014 - 06:35 PM, said:

so, guys, how do you think, which one is more of an achievement, having an "iq" of 60- or 140+ ? 

Neither. I think it's more like a thing you born with than something that you can achieve.



_Antipathy #32 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View Post2Tee2, on 24 July 2014 - 05:52 PM, said:

 

thanx, gotta admit i wasnt expecting you to be the one restoring my faith in natural selection :D

 

Try ~4 different tests and then make the average or choose the highest (problem?).



Laatikkomafia #33 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:03 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23265 battles
  • 5,091
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010
IQ: 43
IQ while drunk: 143

Stats below:

2Tee2 #34 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:04 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

k, lets establish some baseline here

 

do we all know what "normal"/Gaussian distribution is?

 

what *precisely* the generally available "iq" tests measure?

 

when did it all start? :popcorn:

 

PS

hint, how would you make a culturally independent test regarding the number 7?



2Tee2 #35 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:10 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

View PostJohn_Preston, on 24 July 2014 - 06:53 PM, said:

Neither. I think it's more like a thing you born with than something that you can achieve.

 

thats one of my issues ...just a single one ;(



_Antipathy #36 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View Post2Tee2, on 24 July 2014 - 06:10 PM, said:

 

thats one of my issues ...just a single one ;(

 

Actually it depends on how you're educated...



2Tee2 #37 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:23 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

View Post_Antipathy, on 24 July 2014 - 07:15 PM, said:

 

Actually it depends on how you're educated...

 

deterministically vs deterministicablelelelly/crapmy english sucks/? :D



_Antipathy #38 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:26 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View Post2Tee2, on 24 July 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

 

deterministically vs deterministicablelelelly/crapmy english sucks/? :D

 

Your English skills don't matter.



2Tee2 #39 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:27 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26737 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014
how about "grouyp intelligence" Arnold? 

_Antipathy #40 Posted 24 July 2014 - 06:29 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 651 battles
  • 6,921
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

View Post2Tee2, on 24 July 2014 - 06:27 PM, said:

how about "grouyp intelligence" Arnold? 


 Group what?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users