Jump to content


IQ in relation to WOT skill.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
92 replies to this topic

2Tee2 #81 Posted 27 July 2014 - 09:45 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 26153 battles
  • 3,518
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

View PostAnuSuaraj, on 25 July 2014 - 05:21 PM, said:

10 kg of potatoes

 

lets go technical. whats teh total energy?



Woody1999 #82 Posted 28 July 2014 - 02:11 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 17117 battles
  • 6,487
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011

View Post2Tee2, on 27 July 2014 - 09:45 AM, said:

 

lets go technical. whats teh total energy?

 

E = mc2

 

E = 1x104 * (3x108)2 = 10,000 * 300,000,000

 

E = 9e + 20J

 

Woody


Edited by Woody1999, 28 July 2014 - 02:26 AM.


_Amko_ #83 Posted 28 July 2014 - 02:25 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33718 battles
  • 302
  • Member since:
    12-02-2013

View PostStoke_Me_A_Clipper, on 22 July 2014 - 06:20 PM, said:

Hello fellow taters. I ask a simple question. I hope many will take part.

 

IQ shows your ability to learn so with this in mind I wish to know Does IQ have any relevance to player ability in WOT.

 

So please below post your IQ score( I would prefer those who have undergone proper IQ testing to put thier scores down however If you have never done this please visit 4 online IQ test sights then take an average of your 4 scores to get an approximation I will factor in a 20% RNG*** for these scores.)

 

Next to your IQ score can you also post your win rate and your PR rating.

 

This data is not  perfect it should bre treated as half serious. I will log data if and when there is enough of it. Im hoping for at least 60 replies. I will display it on  a graph for you all to see.

 

Keep the thread civil please no tater bashing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hahahha this post is example that human stupidity dont have limits and that some brains are not capabile to understand what is iq...why the f iq have anything with game...like in real life some1 is better in fisihing,some1 is good in driving skateboard,playing some instruments etc....u doomed people are taking this game to much serious


Edited by _Amko_, 28 July 2014 - 02:25 AM.


MudMonkey #84 Posted 28 July 2014 - 02:47 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3909 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

Do you realy think that people with a low IQ and/or with bad stats would post their data here? I havent read all the post here, but I doubt that there are any. And have you ever done a real statistical survey? Do you know how much data samples you need to get a result that would be sientifically solid? Somehow I doubt you know what you are doing here. (Yes I know what I am talking of.) Have you ever thought of those with less money than you that cant affort a good gaming computer, that are sick or disabled (just think about MS, authism and people with only one arm or none at all) or just dont care about stats and just want to vent stress? If you say now that these are minor cases, proof it.

 

So, what is the goal of this poll? To tell others with less good stats that they are not only "fails" in the game but also in RL? Because you are claiming that there is a connection. Do you want to put yourself above those people by claiming (claiming because, hey, its the internet) that you are more intelligent and successful in RL?

That you are a ... better person because your stats are proof that you are more intelligent and therefore more successful?

I find this thought not only very(!) wrong but also disturbing. Dont walk this way, man. Close this Post.

I understand that you are annoyed by bad gameplay which f**ks up your game. But it is like gold ammo. Deal with it.

 

 



LUNSSI #85 Posted 28 July 2014 - 07:24 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 2,370
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

View PostMudMonkey, on 28 July 2014 - 02:47 AM, said:

Do you realy think that people with a low IQ and/or with bad stats would post their data here? I havent read all the post here, but I doubt that there are any. And have you ever done a real statistical survey? Do you know how much data samples you need to get a result that would be sientifically solid? Somehow I doubt you know what you are doing here. (Yes I know what I am talking of.) Have you ever thought of those with less money than you that cant affort a good gaming computer, that are sick or disabled (just think about MS, authism and people with only one arm or none at all) or just dont care about stats and just want to vent stress? If you say now that these are minor cases, proof it.

 

So, what is the goal of this poll? To tell others with less good stats that they are not only "fails" in the game but also in RL? Because you are claiming that there is a connection. Do you want to put yourself above those people by claiming (claiming because, hey, its the internet) that you are more intelligent and successful in RL?

That you are a ... better person because your stats are proof that you are more intelligent and therefore more successful?

I find this thought not only very(!) wrong but also disturbing. Dont walk this way, man. Close this Post.

I understand that you are annoyed by bad gameplay which f**ks up your game. But it is like gold ammo. Deal with it.

 

 

 

Read before you post.



MudMonkey #86 Posted 28 July 2014 - 10:06 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3909 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

View PostStoke_Me_A_Clipper, on 28 July 2014 - 08:24 PM, said:

 

Read before you post.


Obviously you dont read. I did but I dont read all the posts here. But to shut you up, I did it now. Now you can go back and answer my questions.


Edited by MudMonkey, 28 July 2014 - 10:09 PM.


LUNSSI #87 Posted 28 July 2014 - 10:37 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 2,370
  • Member since:
    06-13-2013

View PostMudMonkey, on 28 July 2014 - 10:06 PM, said:


Obviously you dont read. I did but I dont read all the posts here. But to shut you up, I did it now. Now you can go back and answer my questions.


No thank you.



MudMonkey #88 Posted 29 July 2014 - 12:35 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3909 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    03-11-2014

View PostStoke_Me_A_Clipper, on 28 July 2014 - 11:37 PM, said:


No thank you.


Well, and with this you just disqualified yourself and this whole "I make a statistical survey about people that fail" number.

Kinda funny that you fail at it.



Outlawz0111 #89 Posted 07 August 2014 - 03:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4351 battles
  • 749
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
IQ has nothing to do with how good you are on a video game. 90% of the smurfs in this game are gold spammers.

Major_cjs #90 Posted 07 August 2014 - 04:27 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 3836 battles
  • 3,375
  • Member since:
    10-27-2013

View PostOutlawz0111, on 07 August 2014 - 03:50 PM, said:

IQ has nothing to do with how good you are on a video game. 90% of the smurfs in this game are gold spammers.

True geniuses dings the top tiers? Prem is in the game and are there for everyone, use it wisely and ding less.

If you are good enough then you can even spam it and still make a profit, just saying...


Edited by Major_cjs, 07 August 2014 - 04:31 PM.


belkov #91 Posted 08 August 2014 - 01:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 29507 battles
  • 227
  • Member since:
    11-28-2010

You are asking for IQ's on an internet forum and expect true and honest answers across the board? Dunning Kruger anyone? :bajan:

 

Funny how almost everybody is 120+ all of a sudden...the WoT player-base must be comprised of the most intelligent people the world has ever seen.......but I will bite....IQ 140+, stats http://www.noobmeter.com/player/eu/belkov/500190569/



_intoxicated_ #92 Posted 08 August 2014 - 02:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21531 battles
  • 560
  • Member since:
    03-06-2011

Don't forget about

 

 

*hic*



Neilloss46 #93 Posted 12 August 2014 - 07:19 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13414 battles
  • 1,096
  • [MIND] MIND
  • Member since:
    09-20-2012
At op's request this topic will now be closed.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users