Jump to content


New Feature - Clan Rating


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
18 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 24 July 2014 - 04:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 25,696
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
The Game Design team has created a new feature for measuring the battle effectivity of clans.

Full news text


Ew_ #2 Posted 24 July 2014 - 04:38 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 36922 battles
  • 3,392
  • [E-50M] E-50M
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011
FAME top1 yeah!

MadNick #3 Posted 24 July 2014 - 04:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29715 battles
  • 514
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011
inb4 nerf fame

Ew_ #4 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:04 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 36922 battles
  • 3,392
  • [E-50M] E-50M
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011
The statpadder clans can hate as much as they want and tailor a formula that puts themselves on top, there is only one true Top1 clan tho, even WG recognizes that :)

Edited by Ew_, 24 July 2014 - 06:49 PM.


guest273 #5 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:06 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 35394 battles
  • 2,261
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012
Kazna 3rd on 3/5 categories...Unbeatable bronze...GJ kazna.

Xensation #6 Posted 24 July 2014 - 05:08 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Clan Commander
  • 15736 battles
  • 7,712
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
No JELLY on top? Flawed rating

NikLemos #7 Posted 24 July 2014 - 07:35 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 52747 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    07-17-2011

Nice feature. :)   Bad rating , but good idea..

 


Edited by NikLemos, 24 July 2014 - 07:43 PM.


JimMorr #8 Posted 24 July 2014 - 08:12 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21469 battles
  • 85
  • [S_O_W] S_O_W
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

Did you not have time to add a proper search engine? It shouldn't pass unit tests not to mention publishing it in public:

- no search by clan's TAG

- after finding clan's name error message appears, about fields' max lenght being exeeded

 

sorry

working for SQA affects my brain 



Xensation #9 Posted 24 July 2014 - 09:50 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Clan Commander
  • 15736 battles
  • 7,712
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

View PostJimMorr, on 24 July 2014 - 08:12 PM, said:

Did you not have time to add a proper search engine? It shouldn't pass unit tests not to mention publishing it in public:

- no search by clan's TAG

- after finding clan's name error message appears, about fields' max lenght being exeeded

 

sorry

working for SQA affects my brain 



HerrWilhelm #10 Posted 25 July 2014 - 12:59 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19456 battles
  • 458
  • [RHPA] RHPA
  • Member since:
    02-02-2012
+1 for the idea although my clan will never reach a decent rating...

BattleMetalChris #11 Posted 25 July 2014 - 02:00 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 9222 battles
  • 7,685
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-18-2011
It uses WG personal rating, so is immediately rendered utterly useless.

Woody1999 #12 Posted 25 July 2014 - 02:57 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14769 battles
  • 6,482
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011

Bloody T-D-U are higher than us. I demand civil Dingers war!

 

Aoody



hadding #13 Posted 25 July 2014 - 08:30 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 60701 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011
Looks like Clans rating equals clan members rating average more or less.

NefertumCz #14 Posted 25 July 2014 - 08:53 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25324 battles
  • 308
  • Member since:
    09-17-2011

View PostBattleMetalChris, on 25 July 2014 - 03:00 AM, said:

It uses WG personal rating, so is immediately rendered utterly useless.


So WJDE would be 1st using some other kind of measurement?



mack00 #15 Posted 25 July 2014 - 09:21 AM

    Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 595 battles
  • 252
  • [SUB-0] SUB-0
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View PostJimMorr, on 24 July 2014 - 09:12 PM, said:

Did you not have time to add a proper search engine? It shouldn't pass unit tests not to mention publishing it in public:

- no search by clan's TAG

- after finding clan's name error message appears, about fields' max lenght being exeeded

 

sorry

working for SQA affects my brain 

 

you can search by tag, you just have to enter the tag then wait a while for full clan name appear below and then click on full name and then click search -> very easy UI indeed ;)



VeryRisky #16 Posted 25 July 2014 - 11:30 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 17207 battles
  • 8,529
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

View PostNefertumCz, on 25 July 2014 - 08:53 AM, said:


So WJDE would be 1st using some other kind of measurement?

 

No.   We're all noobs.



TurnedToDusk #17 Posted 25 July 2014 - 10:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6594 battles
  • 25
  • [JUICE] JUICE
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011
Huray! More reasons to give eachother crap!

Dihi #18 Posted 26 July 2014 - 12:30 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37259 battles
  • 390
  • Member since:
    03-06-2011
So, just a question: isn't the "Global map rating" a totally flawed concept if it doesn't take into account delaying attacks and ceding of provinces to allied clans?

guest273 #19 Posted 27 July 2014 - 06:47 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 35394 battles
  • 2,261
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012

View PostWoody1999, on 25 July 2014 - 02:57 AM, said:

Aoody

Let me do the function of auto correct - did you mean "Woody"?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users