Jump to content


T-54 needs hull nerfing.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
197 replies to this topic

Dragos_CS #161 Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:40 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

Oh you scrubs. I said gold is there to used.

USE =\= SPAM , get it? Also, E50M is a designated sniper. It has 0.3 acc. You keep the distance, play to your strenghts, not to your weaknesses.

And, tbh, when talking about the game, unis are vastly superior. Even with all the gold spam and OP tank play and all the camping in the world will not get you purple overalls, probably not even recents, and your winrate would be crap, not in the 60% area.

Fun fact: did you know WN8 punishes OP tank play?



Dragos_CS #162 Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:45 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Post7049, on 05 August 2014 - 01:58 PM, said:

 

It is a well known fact the the T54 is the best tier 9 medium in the game. When used with gold ammo it is by far the best tier 9 medium, maybe even better then some tier 10 medium tanks. But I have only 63 battles in it with 40% win. But most of those were 100% stock.

 

I use both E-50 and E-50M as front line assault tanks. No sniping/camping what so ever.

 

No gold, no free XP used, no platoons.

 

My E-50M stats 43% win

Maximum Experience per Battle 1,716
Hit Ratio 82.05%

 

Kill/Death Ratio 0.82
Damage Caused/Received 0.74
Average Number of Vehicles Destroyed per Battle 0.64
Average Damage Caused per Battle 1,321

 

E-50 46% win

Maximum Experience per Battle 2,098
Hit Ratio

82.77%

Kill/Death Ratio 1.06
Damage Caused/Received 0.87
Average Number of Vehicles Destroyed per Battle 0.76
Average Damage Caused per Battle 1,298

 

 

 

Nah if you yolorush in a sniper tank, what the f you want?

Anything less than your HP is quite pathetic, you are useless in the team.



7049 #163 Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 155 battles
  • 1,495
  • Member since:
    12-11-2012

View PostDragos_CS, on 05 August 2014 - 04:40 PM, said:

Oh you scrubs. I said gold is there to used.

USE =\= SPAM , get it? Also, E50M is a designated sniper. It has 0.3 acc. You keep the distance, play to your strengths, not to your weaknesses.

And, tbh, when talking about the game, unis are vastly superior. Even with all the gold spam and OP tank play and all the camping in the world will not get you purple overalls, probably not even recents, and your winrate would be crap, not in the 60% area.

Fun fact: did you know WN8 punishes OP tank play?

 

You sound like I should want to be a cum. I have no aspirations towards that. My WN8 is only going down. I have about 23k battles. My overal WN8 is about 1150, my last 1000 battles WN8 is about 900. That drop is mainly due to scouting in German high tier mediums(E-50 and E-50M) or scouting with light tanks and doing zero damage.

 

I never denied that WN8 punishes OP tanks, not enough but it does not the less. I do not have a single tank  with better then yellow stats. I have 43% win in my E-50M, trying to get it below 40%.

 

View PostDragos_CS, on 05 August 2014 - 04:45 PM, said:

Nah if you yolorush in a sniper tank, what the f you want?

Anything less than your HP is quite pathetic, you are useless in the team.

 

 

Should I care about the team? They are fail campers anyway. if you think medium tanks should snipe you fail, if you want to snipe, play TDs.

 

Sniping = right hand cling and drooling over keyboard.

 


Edited by 7049, 05 August 2014 - 04:50 PM.


hgjwz #164 Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13313 battles
  • 2,263
  • Member since:
    02-10-2013

View Post7049, on 05 August 2014 - 05:28 PM, said:

 

Lorry 40t, BC25, panther I and II, E-50 and E-50M might like to have a word with you. So much fun driving uphill in a Panther II and see a heavy tank going faster uphill then your medium.

 

 

Thank you I guess.

 

The heck there is absolutely nothing wrong with BC and not even lorraine, heck i might only agree with the E series tanks. Even those tanks are mobile enough considering the gun / armor combination.

 

Also i find your logic about sniping mediums somehow hilarious considering all of them (t9-10) have perfectly viable guns for sniping.


Edited by hgjwz, 05 August 2014 - 04:59 PM.


Dragos_CS #165 Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Post7049, on 05 August 2014 - 05:47 PM, said:

 

You sound like I should want to be a cum. I have no aspirations towards that. My WN8 is only going down. I have about 23k battles. My overal WN8 is about 1150, my last 1000 battles WN8 is about 900. That drop is mainly due to scouting in German high tier mediums(E-50 and E-50M) or scouting with light tanks and doing zero damage.

 

I never denied that WN8 punishes OP tanks, not enough but it does not the less. I do not have a single tank  with better then yellow stats. I have 43% win in my E-50M, trying to get it below 40%.

 

 

Should I care about the team? They are fail campers anyway. if you think medium tanks should snipe you fail, if you want to snipe, play TDs.

 

Sniping = right hand cling and drooling over keyboard.

Fine. I didnt know that sucking at something can be considered fun. Go yolorush in your tanks. I will give you some XP from spotting damage if i see you.



cherry2blost #166 Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 946
  • [BAD-A] BAD-A
  • Member since:
    12-19-2010

View PostDragos_CS, on 05 August 2014 - 03:40 PM, said:

Oh you scrubs. I said gold is there to used.

USE =\= SPAM , get it? Also, E50M is a designated sniper. It has 0.3 acc. You keep the distance, play to your strenghts, not to your weaknesses.

And, tbh, when talking about the game, unis are vastly superior. Even with all the gold spam and OP tank play and all the camping in the world will not get you purple overalls, probably not even recents, and your winrate would be crap, not in the 60% area.

Fun fact: did you know WN8 punishes OP tank play?

 

Wow 4800 games in 3 years.... just...wow



Dragos_CS #167 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:03 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Postcherry2blost, on 05 August 2014 - 05:57 PM, said:

 

Wow 4800 games in 3 years.... just...wow

Made the account in 2011. Played couple of battles, didnt like it, came back in summer 2013 and played untill september, took a 4-month break, then came back and played untill now. Thankfully my eyes have opened after the 4 month break amd realised that being a loser like you and 7049 is not fum so i improved my gameplay.

And now, how is my battle count relevant? Im not a reroll, i started like a tomato, 800wn8 at 800 battles. Ckeck my Noobmeter graphs.



cherry2blost #168 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 19301 battles
  • 946
  • [BAD-A] BAD-A
  • Member since:
    12-19-2010

Just your stats look interesting.... as no time at all has been spent on crappy tanks...straight through Russians to the T54....USA to T29 T32..... doesn't look like a 2nd account... honest mate

 

 

Reverse reroll maybe.......

 

See now account was created on day one of open release.... means either you were in the BETA. ... or have a second account.... with stats you probably don't like as much....


Edited by cherry2blost, 05 August 2014 - 05:12 PM.


Dragos_CS #169 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:16 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

So i had another account before 2011. Stronk logic.

I was just a quick learner. Also, my goal was TX from the very beggining. I think i sucked [edited]untill M103.

I came to the forums from 1k battles and people told me i do fine and to push to T10. It came out fine.

 

P.S. i platooned with 2 uni's at around 3k battles and it helpeed


Edited by Dragos_CS, 05 August 2014 - 05:17 PM.


hgjwz #170 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:17 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13313 battles
  • 2,263
  • Member since:
    02-10-2013

View Postcherry2blost, on 05 August 2014 - 06:09 PM, said:

Just your stats look interesting.... as no time at all has been spent on crappy tanks...straight through Russians to the T54....USA to T29 T32..... doesn't look like a 2nd account... honest mate

 

 

Reverse reroll maybe.......

 

See now account was created on day one of open release.... means either you were in the BETA. ... or have a second account.... with stats you probably don't like as much....

 

Yes everyone has to be reroll now, what next ?



Dragos_CS #171 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Postcherry2blost, on 05 August 2014 - 06:09 PM, said:

Just your stats look interesting.... as no time at all has been spent on crappy tanks...straight through Russians to the T54....USA to T29 T32..... doesn't look like a 2nd account... honest mate

 

 

Reverse reroll maybe.......

 

See now account was created on day one of open release.... means either you were in the BETA. ... or have a second account.... with stats you probably don't like as much....

Dude, i saw an advertisment on a web page, created an account and was disappointed with the graphics and crap, when i had BF3 to play. I started playing again after i saw that TV ad campaign and saw the improvement in graphics, gameplay and so.

Check my fricking graphs. Do you see that full potato moment untill i reached 1,4k battles?

 

I dont even know when the game was released.


Edited by Dragos_CS, 05 August 2014 - 05:31 PM.


Search_Warrant #172 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 28596 battles
  • 6,435
  • [FLOOF] FLOOF
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
Seems this has turned into a STATS WARS!

hgjwz #173 Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:34 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13313 battles
  • 2,263
  • Member since:
    02-10-2013

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 05 August 2014 - 06:33 PM, said:

Seems this has turned into a STATS WARS!

 

Ye T-54 argument was over 3 pages ago didn't you see ?

 



7049 #174 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 155 battles
  • 1,495
  • Member since:
    12-11-2012

View Posthgjwz, on 05 August 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:

 

The heck there is absolutely nothing wrong with BC and not even lorraine, heck i might only agree with the E series tanks. Even those tanks are mobile enough considering the gun / armor combination.

 

Also i find your logic about sniping mediums somehow hilarious considering all of them (t9-10) have perfectly viable guns for sniping.

 

Just because you can does not mean you have to.

 

View PostDragos_CS, on 05 August 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:

Fine. I didnt know that sucking at something can be considered fun. Go yolorush in your tanks. I will give you some XP from spotting damage if i see you.

 

Thank you I appreciate the gesture. Just because I am not obsessing over stats does not mean that I do not enjoy the game. I never read patch notes, go to the wiki or learn weak spots. But still I enjoy the game.

 

View PostDragos_CS, on 05 August 2014 - 05:03 PM, said:

Made the account in 2011. Played couple of battles, didnt like it, came back in summer 2013 and played untill september, took a 4-month break, then came back and played untill now. Thankfully my eyes have opened after the 4 month break amd realised that being a loser like you and 7049 is not fum so i improved my gameplay.

And now, how is my battle count relevant? Im not a reroll, i started like a tomato, 800wn8 at 800 battles. Ckeck my Noobmeter graphs.

 

How mature of you, callings people names. Is that how you win an argument? I still have 800WN8, so what?



hgjwz #175 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:12 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 13313 battles
  • 2,263
  • Member since:
    02-10-2013

View Post7049, on 05 August 2014 - 07:09 PM, said:

 

Just because you can does not mean you have to.

 

 

Its not my problem if you are playing meds wrong, you could try learn to play them in right way or start using heavies / heavily armored td:s to yolo with.



Alteisen #176 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 16739 battles
  • 1,292
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010

View Posthgjwz, on 05 August 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:

 

Its not my problem if you are playing meds wrong, you could try learn to play them in right way or start using heavies / heavily armored td:s to yolo with.

He'll just complain that everyone shoots cheats at him or random wildcum meds slaughter his tanks while permatracked. 



7049 #177 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 155 battles
  • 1,495
  • Member since:
    12-11-2012
I also play heavy tanks and some TDs. But even when I play TDs like the AC48 I will be at the front line or beyond. I do better in heavy tanks since they are so God awful slow. Takes longer to die. Did I complain that I die early in the battle?

Dragos_CS #178 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:38 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22832 battles
  • 2,081
  • [LGEND] LGEND
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Post7049, on 05 August 2014 - 07:09 PM, said:

 

Just because you can does not mean you have to.

 

 

Thank you I appreciate the gesture. Just because I am not obsessing over stats does not mean that I do not enjoy the game. I never read patch notes, go to the wiki or learn weak spots. But still I enjoy the game.

 

 

How mature of you, callings people names. Is that how you win an argument? I still have 800WN8, so what?

Not knowing patch notes or weakspots = sucking hard at the game (btw did you bounce on VK45B lower plate recently?) . I cant comprehend enjoying something you are bad at. And yes, i was a potato at 800wn8, but at least i had the guts to recognize that i suck and improve, unlike you.

Why are you a loser? Because you are a noob and dont want to improve. I wont call a willing person a loser. Why is cherry2blost a loser? Because he thinks anyone with better stats is a statpadder or a re-roll.



7049 #179 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 155 battles
  • 1,495
  • Member since:
    12-11-2012
I know I can do better. If I concentrate green stats should be reachable.  But for some odd reason I just don't seem to be able to gather the will, too many things in-game just annoy me. Rattle my cage for some reason.

Search_Warrant #180 Posted 05 August 2014 - 06:52 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 28596 battles
  • 6,435
  • [FLOOF] FLOOF
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
i killed a tiger 2 from angled side and shot a conqueror threw the turret face 2 times and kill them both. heavy tanks! then suddently T-54..1 whole tier lower shows up and suddenly he gets granted immunity to my gun? **** you WG. since when should mediums be given better armor layouts and 190+pen immunity hulls and turrets than HEAVY TANKS! balance at its finest.

Edited by Search_Warrant, 05 August 2014 - 06:52 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users