Jump to content


Object 907

Object 907 907 Guide

  • Please log in to reply
78 replies to this topic

NiemandXL #61 Posted 08 May 2017 - 08:26 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37955 battles
  • 2,934
  • Member since:
    01-30-2013
The last patch brought another indirect buff for the 907. Being able to re-use the repair kit means the ammo rack that can be damaged from the front is way less of a problem now.

Titaniumas #62 Posted 13 May 2017 - 01:54 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 36516 battles
  • 147
  • [PTS] PTS
  • Member since:
    12-18-2011

I dont get it.

 

How is this tank balanced ?

 

One of the best armor in all mediums in the game.

One of the most accurate guns in the game.

One of the fastest firign guns on the game.

One of the lowest tanks in the game and by this mean one of the tanks with better depression in the game.

One of the strongest turrets in the game.

One of the most mobile tanks in the game.

One of the best penetrating guns in all mediums in the game.

All the best clans using them as main medium tank in strongholds, skirmishes and clan wars.

 

2 conescutive matches I meet one in the enemy team 2 consecutive times they are top damages top bouncer and the second one also top assisted. 

 

I dont get it.

 

Why ?

 

What is the point ?

 

What are they trying to tell us ?

 


Edited by Titaniumas, 13 May 2017 - 01:54 AM.


Ricky_Rolls #63 Posted 19 May 2017 - 03:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 68043 battles
  • 1,377
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010

View PostTitaniumas, on 13 May 2017 - 01:54 AM, said:

I dont get it.

 

How is this tank balanced ?

 

One of the best armor in all mediums in the game.

LOL wtf? U can pen the side with a D25T.

One of the most accurate guns in the game.

0.36 and 0.12 while moving is accurate to you?

One of the fastest firign guns on the game.

Who cares if u can't hit crap?

One of the lowest tanks in the game and by this mean one of the tanks with better depression in the game.

-5° of gun depression, wich is barely decent.

One of the strongest turrets in the game.

Overmatched by any 120mm+ gun in the game, such OP, much wow.

One of the most mobile tanks in the game.

Tell that to the tvp or the batchat.

One of the best penetrating guns in all mediums in the game.

Patton, centturion AX, leo 1, and E50m all have better pen.

All the best clans using them as main medium tank in strongholds, skirmishes and clan wars.

 

2 conescutive matches I meet one in the enemy team 2 consecutive times they are top damages top bouncer and the second one also top assisted. 

 

I dont get it.

Me neither.

 

Why ?

 

What is the point ?

Wanna talk about a broken tank? T1105 when it came in HD, that was a truly broken piece because any retard could carry in it, not the case with the 907.

 

What are they trying to tell us ?

 

 

LMFAO. Do you even understand something about this game?

 

To get back on tracks with the original subject, i came back after a long break and i sincerely can't seem to understand why everyone is getting crazy about this tank.

I played it before (when it was a SD model) and i swore to myself to never play this tank again after i 3 Moe'd it because it was nothing but a "decent" 430.

I played some games with it and i didn't notice anything regarding a so-called armor buff. U can't sidecrap for crapbecause any tank would overmatch ur tracks (same for the turret), the accuracy on the move doesn't come close to the 140, -5° gun depression is pretty much useless in almost all cases (at least u have a real turret with the 62A).

The only thing i noticed was the ammorack on the front (the only russian that has this btw) which doesn't get hurt as much as before.

 

To me it still remains a good 430 and a bad 62A/140.

 


Edited by Ricky_Rolls, 19 May 2017 - 03:18 PM.


Swoopie #64 Posted 19 May 2017 - 04:00 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 28635 battles
  • 2,554
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-15-2011

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 19 May 2017 - 04:15 PM, said:

 

LMFAO. Do you even understand something about this game?

 

To get back on tracks with the original subject, i came back after a long break and i sincerely can't seem to understand why everyone is getting crazy about this tank.

I played it before (when it was a SD model) and i swore to myself to never play this tank again after i 3 Moe'd it because it was nothing but a "decent" 430.

I played some games with it and i didn't notice anything regarding a so-called armor buff. U can't sidecrap for crapbecause any tank would overmatch ur tracks (same for the turret), the accuracy on the move doesn't come close to the 140, -5° gun depression is pretty much useless in almost all cases (at least u have a real turret with the 62A).

The only thing i noticed was the ammorack on the front (the only russian that has this btw) which doesn't get hurt as much as before.

 

To me it still remains a good 430 and a bad 62A/140.

 

 

Well for "some" reason every top clan uses it now over the other russian meds. Sure it has better DPM, which makes a good case for taking it over the others russian meds in competitive play, but this wasn't the case before the armor buffs (140 was used as the top russian med before that). Currently the armor is ridiculous, imo they overbuffed it. A good starting point now would be atleast to take off the track pieces from the LFP (So it doesn't randomly jump between 240-270 effective slightly angled on a otherwise flat surface).

 

You can ask your old clan commander daki about the armor and the complete bs bounces it gets sometimes. Or just watch his stream when he plays advances/SH's against these things, he makes remarks about 907's armor often enough.

 

Personally I'd prefer if WG straight up removed this (Atleast from competitive modes). Atleast shooting 140's was somewhat consistent, RNG deciding to make your shot go slightly wide from center didn't completely screw up a well aimed shot, like it would in 907's case.

 

Like it or not, the 907 buffs made the other russian meds completely irrelevant in competitive play.


Edited by Swoopie, 19 May 2017 - 04:03 PM.


Titaniumas #65 Posted 04 June 2017 - 02:10 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 36516 battles
  • 147
  • [PTS] PTS
  • Member since:
    12-18-2011

Dont worry, Swoopie, Ricky here is simply trolling, he has 3k average damage in teh 430, 3500 in the T62 and 140 and 4100 in the 907. He also has better ACCURACY in the 907 than in any other russian med. But then again we know it, the 907 is currently the old E5.

 

There is a reason if I didnt answer him, I'm not in the mood for trolling and countertrolling since meeting these immortal 907s continuosly is pissing me off a lot. And I dont even talk about skirmishes or SH, where u can see entire TEAMS made of only 907. 


Edited by Titaniumas, 04 June 2017 - 02:11 AM.


Eokokok #66 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:12 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18612 battles
  • 6,161
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012
Well, they are not immortal. Ubalanced and OP, yes, but still not on the T-22 prenerf level. That being said, it should be nerfed.

FluffyRedFox #67 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:33 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 24139 battles
  • 8,922
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View PostEokokok, on 05 June 2017 - 02:12 PM, said:

That being said, it should be nerfed.

Whilst they won't nerf premiums, is there any instance before of a reward tank being nerfed?



trispect #68 Posted 06 June 2017 - 03:40 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33282 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    01-16-2011

View Postfishbob101, on 05 June 2017 - 09:33 PM, said:

Whilst they won't nerf premiums, is there any instance before of a reward tank being nerfed?

 

T-22

_Crusad3r_ #69 Posted 06 June 2017 - 03:45 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31242 battles
  • 1,620
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

View Posttrispect, on 06 June 2017 - 02:40 PM, said:

 

T-22

 

Thats an exception imo - people rigged to get that and I don't mean merons with sub-50% winrate - even 60%'ers and other similar stat players I am friends with admitted to rigging those missions....

 

I think the only buff the 907 needed was the improved ammo rack but for me I haven't noticed much difference in the armour but then again I rarely play it as I have a love/hate relationship with the gun handling :P I am also trying to grind some of the lower tiers like Chi-Ri and 110 to get other T10's  for CW :P



Titaniumas #70 Posted 08 June 2017 - 07:30 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 36516 battles
  • 147
  • [PTS] PTS
  • Member since:
    12-18-2011

View PostEokokok, on 05 June 2017 - 03:12 PM, said:

Well, they are not immortal. Ubalanced and OP, yes, but still not on the T-22 prenerf level. That being said, it should be nerfed.

 

The only thing I can think of that comes close to the T22 pre nerf level is the original T54 when it was first introduced with 120mm of frontal armor, gold shells only for gold and WG had to to a page where they explained how to pen it.



Dammonar #71 Posted 27 July 2017 - 02:13 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 53299 battles
  • 568
  • Member since:
    02-22-2011
farmed ranked easy mode with it. Still I cannot get more than 3.3k averege dam,age per battle with it and it will be impossible to three mark.. pleb me

Ewimangel_DaGOD #72 Posted 31 July 2017 - 05:34 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30865 battles
  • 1,075
  • [TRVST] TRVST
  • Member since:
    09-23-2012

nerf it again to make 3 marking easier. i dont want to deal 5k dmg every battle to get close



HunterXHunter8 #73 Posted 18 August 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33733 battles
  • 959
  • Member since:
    04-27-2013

View PostFAME_skill4ltu, on 31 July 2017 - 05:34 AM, said:

nerf it again to make 3 marking easier. i dont want to deal 5k dmg every battle to get close

 

since u got a lot of moes

 

i was gonna ask how come some tanks have very high requirements for 3 marks??

eg: wz-111 5a for example needs 5.4k damage every game for 3 marks, even the 2 marks are in 4k range 



moerken #74 Posted 04 January 2018 - 09:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21771 battles
  • 21
  • [-ACS-] -ACS-
  • Member since:
    09-15-2011
Time they [edited]nerf this stupidly russian bias OP tank.

Snaques #75 Posted 10 January 2018 - 02:04 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28250 battles
  • 444
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2017

I feel like 907 gets the OP rep mainly because 907 players are generally much better than say the average 140 player.

 

So I'm not having difficulty destroying one if the 907 player is average, the problem is that more often than not  he's not. :harp:


Edited by Snaques, 10 January 2018 - 02:05 PM.


Snaques #76 Posted 09 February 2018 - 11:55 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28250 battles
  • 444
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2017

Can someone easily explain what are the events where you can get the 907 and how often they appear?

 

I mean, I know it is a CW reward tank.  


Edited by Snaques, 09 February 2018 - 11:56 AM.


makso1 #77 Posted 16 February 2018 - 09:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2192 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
hes good i like it

Koenus666 #78 Posted 10 March 2018 - 12:05 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29714 battles
  • 147
  • [1KM] 1KM
  • Member since:
    12-25-2012
WEAK UP WG TOO OP ARMOR for a med tank change it NOW

Danzeratar #79 Posted 07 March 2019 - 07:54 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13145 battles
  • 98
  • Member since:
    07-14-2012
Tog II has more armor for its tier than this tank





Also tagged with Object 907, 907, Guide

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users